Quote:
|
Originally Posted by isynge
Is anyone else slightly perplexed by Motor's choice of "classic" Le Mans to revisit. 1988 was fair enough - especially to see the contemporary commentary which showed how well Jag concealed Lammers' gearbox problem - from the coverage it looked as though it was running like a train; but 1993 seemed a bit odd as a choice and why 1998 - I'd have plumped for '91 and '95 before either of these two.
|
I hadn't picked up on that, but you're right. They clearly decided to show 1988 (understandably) and then, rather than researching their subject, came up with the bright idea of simply leaving a five year gap between the races they subsequently broadcast (1988/1993/1998/2003).
