13 May 2009, 17:59 (Ref:2461853)
|
#316
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by henk4
Decision Nr 8. "Car no 25 is allowed to race but will start from the pitlane in 2nd position behind car no.23"
That''s the complete wording. Nothing about tyre changes.
The 007 Lola-Aston Martin had also not qualified, but was allowed to race.
|
I could frankly care less about the cause of the second penalty!
Quote:
|
If in fact what had been stated in the first post on this subject was correct (evidently not), then it would have been the entity who released said statement that was implying, not you for posting it! The reason being that the original penalty was superceded by the 2nd penalty___FWFR____. Therefore the, supposed, rescinding of the first penalty is moot and nothing but whitewash/fluff to make them look better! Also in further annoyance was the fact that the points did not reflect the previouos penalty being rescinded, which came part and parcel with the 10 grid positions!
|
L.P. 
|
|
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
|