Quote:
Originally Posted by lms
im not talking about the improved safety, just the "cost-capped" lmp2 formula vs the holes. it seems like oak developed the car and yet they gained no advantage. same as the wings (in 2009): money goes into development to gain back the df they lost with the reduced wing. And despite these they are talking about reducing costs in lmp2
|
If Oak want to develop the car and still sell it within the cost capped price range then surely that is their commercial decision?