Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer
Not getting in your face but what is the thought behind that? Obviously we've seen it work in such series as AGT and Supertouring and there are definitely pros and cons but I feel that ownership by people who understand the sport would deliver better outcomes than ownership by a company such as Archer, with no real understanding of the sport, other than the balance sheet.
|
I just have an issue, and reading some of the posts following my previous one, others do as well, with a participant being a majority owner. Penske, Dane, the Kellys, whoever; there is always the risk, whether real or perceived, that they will make the rules to favour their own interests. That's why I'm against an active participant being a majority owner.