|
A lot of people see it as a continuation, even if there was a break. It can be considered spiritually the same. Technically not but the main point is that a similar type series has had different styles through the ages. Grabbing the OP doesn't appreciate that the overall discussion is more than just what the OP laid out.
Which I believe is what you've just said. So why have the approach of having to say someone was wrong when actually the point is similar?
I'm quite lost what points people are making sometimes as it seems more important to prove someone wrong than actually discuss.
|