View Single Post
Old 15 Aug 2020, 06:59 (Ref:3995488)   #333
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,640
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper View Post
Don't get me wrong here, I would more open regulations for all aspects of the category as I think it does very little for the racing. If their intent is to lower costs then do it properly and don't stuff around at the edges. I will make one comment on engine builders, they are all full of promises if you keep giving them money and they deliver very little in most cases. I think I would rather use a crate motor and let the teams spend money on other aspects of the car. The engine regs as they stand are dead end and little is gained for all the money spent.
People **** and moan when common components are introduced but TA2 is the proof that a cheap engine can produce great racing. 5 engine manufacturers all competing is just silly.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Mixer is offline