View Single Post
Old 25 Jan 2001, 09:08 (Ref:60247)   #4
TimD
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
TimD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
United Kingdom
Derbyshire Peak District, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,797
TimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Don't worry, Pete - I'm not running it down. It intrigues me, though, that there were a great number of cars whose design teams obviously didn't find their true potential when they were built.

Perhaps, like Chapman, they were pushing the envelope a bit with the stamina of their cars. Who was it who said that a Lotus should cross the line in first place, and then fall apart - anything more and it was excessively strong for the job.

Well, Bruce Halford and others have been running competitive Lotus 16s for more than two decades, so I guess that's one aspect of Chapman philosophy that's been consigned to the out tray.

And I was wondering if much of the improvement in some cars' form is simply down to someone having the opportunity for a bit of calm reflection - a luxury no-one could afford in the hubbub of a competition season.

By the way, I must correct my own deliberate mistake. Gerry Marshall's single-seater Aston was of course the DBR4. The DBR1 was quite successful enough out of the box, as the 1959 World Sportscar Championship will testify. But when they put the same engine in a monoposto DBR4?

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...
TimD is offline  
Quote