View Single Post
Old 30 Apr 2004, 14:58 (Ref:957008)   #33
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
You know, I'm surprised that these boxes are effective. I'd have thought that the point was for them to be aerodynamically neutral - otherwise, why shorten the wing at all?

Given the assumption that they don't produce d/f (ie don't generate low pressure under the box), wouldn't that reduce the effectiveness of the endplate extension? I thought the extension's purpose was to contain the low pressure immediately under the wing, but to my mind there would still be bleedoff between the low-pressure wing end and the box zone.

:confused:
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote