|
Ganda123 wrote:
>I can think of plenty of reasons for him >being and not being one. Here's a few:
>
I will start the war then!! =) This can be the greatest debate of all time. Any lawyers around here? =) Matt Neal has absolutely NO right to call himself an independent since his car is too new! There's no rule against it, but if the other teams are running 2++ year old cars, how can Matt race his 1 year car.
OTOH, Paul Morris (ASTC) and Abt (STW) took their respective championships in much older cars.
>and he gets old cars,
>
If you consider a ONE year old car "old" then you must be very rich!! A one year old car is "new" enough for me!
>I must point out that I like Matt and he >deserved his success last year.
>
He deserves success as a driver, but NOT as an "independent" competitor.
|