View Single Post
Old 19 Aug 2008, 16:06 (Ref:2271622)   #37
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAG
Course it's low risk, GM and Ford engines are ten a penny, it's simply a matter of making the best available.

Rallyings relevant as they've had strict homologation regs for decades, yet there's still freedom to build your own engines.

How often do teams/manufactuers make engine changes, engines aren't sealed once homologated, there's some freedom for development. Konrad built their own Saleen engines, this was rumoured to be one of the reasons behind their reliability issues.
First off, I think you should compare apples to apples, ie; GM, Acura, Aston Martin, Audi, Ferrari, Porsche, Peugeot. How many of these do you see letting loose of control of their product? None! It is not low risk to these entities.

As to your tuner reference, once again, how many of these do you see being tuned by outside sources? Zero, if they wish to retain any relationship with the Mfg!

L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Quote