Thread: WEC Rebellion Racing
View Single Post
Old 9 May 2018, 18:04 (Ref:3821103)   #1971
EffectiveSprinkles
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 943
EffectiveSprinkles User had had their licence endorsedEffectiveSprinkles User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akrapovic View Post
Just to point out, then the 16th of April through to 2nd May, when the cars arrived at Spa, is 17 days. That's closer to 2 weeks than 3 weeks. So no, he didn't read it wrong - he was as accurate as you can be without adding decimal points to the weeks and remembering that a race does not begin on race day morning and no adjustments can be made to cars when in the back of trucks.
Please do try to read better. The latest adjustment was on that date. The original numbers were published in 2017 and later adjusted before the Prologue.

Once again, for clarity, the privateers have known since the start that they would have to run to a fuel number. The only change has been that actual number. Which in fact makes no difference whatsoever in this case. Rebellion had to run to 2.66L a lap if I recall at Spa. The problem is not the number, the problem is Rebellion has at the moment no system to accurately represent that number real time so the drivers have to make an educated guess. Say there had been no change in April and they could use say 2.8L per lap. That would have made no difference because they still would not have been able to represent that number real time either.

You misunderstand the situation. The changes made to the EoT in April are not changes to the car itself, but to its running conditions. No changes to the car itself, so your comment about them being on the trucks is invalid.

I am sounding like a broken record but it would be very nice if people would stop listening to hacks like Dagys and got the facts straight
EffectiveSprinkles is offline  
Quote