18 Apr 2001, 10:46 (Ref:81888)
|
#22
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 645
|
Quote:
Originally posted by badoer fan
The problem with 20for a win and 12 for second etc, is that it is a much bigger penalty if one retires, or if one finishes 7th or 8th when a rival wins. In 1999, where Hakkinen retired a lot but still won, in my system Irvine won the championship, because he often just kept it on the road for 4th or 5th, and a win made the gap much bigger
|
BF,
I like your score system, I was supporting Irvine in 1999. Maybe IRA should take over Bernies private plane and demand of the 1999 champoinship revision.
|
|
|