View Single Post
Old 15 Apr 2003, 15:31 (Ref:570200)   #4
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Has anyone else seen the problem with the logic behind this late car launchng, especialyl in the long term? What'll happen next March?

Will they have new cars (MP4-19 and F2004-GA) ready, meaning that the cars they've gone to great expense on this year will be used for less than 16 races, or will they launch the new car later, meaning that they have effectively shifted the design process back 2 months, and raced the first few races up against (theoretically) mroe advanced rivals. I know they will have to have engines that last a whole weekend by next year, but the chassis will theoretically still be usable. Would a 2004 Sauber be able to embarass a 2003 Ferrari with the same 2004 Ferrari engine?
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote