Quote:
Originally Posted by crmalcolm
|
That's fine, an interesting way to skew statistics. But it's difficult to accept the idea that Ferrari were "dominant" from 1997 when they didn't win the most races in 1997, 1998 nor 1999. Those years were simply competitive with no one team being dominant. What came after was dominance from Ferrari.
There is no correlation between that list and the list you originally posted which included the likes of Brawn, which is what has made this chat confusing.
Why isn't Williams 1992-1997 on that list? They won 52 out of 98 Grand Prix. In the 98 races races Ferrari took part in "from 1997" onwards they actually won less than Williams did 1992-1997.