View Single Post
Old 8 Jun 2023, 18:30 (Ref:4160801)   #81
crmalcolm
Subscriber
Veteran
 
crmalcolm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Nepal
Exactly where I need to be.
Posts: 12,352
crmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau2 View Post
That's fine, an interesting way to skew statistics. But it's difficult to accept the idea that Ferrari were "dominant" from 1997 when they didn't win the most races in 1997, 1998 nor 1999. Those years were simply competitive with no one team being dominant. What came after was dominance from Ferrari.

There is no correlation between that list and the list you originally posted which included the likes of Brawn, which is what has made this chat confusing.

Why isn't Williams 1992-1997 on that list? They won 52 out of 98 Grand Prix. In the 98 races races Ferrari took part in "from 1997" onwards they actually won less than Williams did 1992-1997.
You would need to read the full thread to understand where / how they feature.

https://tentenths.com/forum/showthread.php?t=157672

But, in short:

Williams 92-97 https://tentenths.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4139311&postcount=42 (peaked at 27 from 48 and 103 from 301)

Their 59 from 114 was bettered by Ferrari in 2004 with a 69 from 117.
crmalcolm is offline  
Quote