Quote:
Originally posted by BootsOntheSide
Ferrari had the problem in 2003 that, when the car wasn't fast enough in Michael's hands, it was usually even slower in Rubens', which impinged on their results (although ti clearly didn't ultimately cost them much).
|
I'd say that, for the first time, when Michael wasn't fast enough, Rubens was usually the better driver in 2003, witness Silverstone as an example, or Hungary, Michael lapped (when was the last time we saw that?) and Rubens was running up in 4th when his suspension broke.