Quote:
Originally Posted by Akrapovic
I personally believe the outcome was penalised rather than the actions. If George hadn't crashed and had just overslowed and held it, I don't think it'd have even been looked at tbh.
|
I know this is really labouring the point - but I think the reason it was looked at was the outcome, but the penalty itself was for the action(s) prior.
It's a vital difference I feel, and is a two part process:
The referral is because of the outcome.
The decision / penalty is because of the action.