|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Jul 2006, 23:58 (Ref:1659572) | #1 | ||||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 46,835
|
Cost Cutting….. And Factory Support…..
Interesting to read in MN this week, a joint interview with Simon McNamara (Holden) and Ray Price (Ford) on their views of the sustainability of the V8 Supercar category.
To quote Mr Ray Price: Quote:
To quote Mr McNamara: Quote:
It seems that the team rationalisations have yet to truly hit their straps….. |
||||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… |
19 Jul 2006, 00:55 (Ref:1659592) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
I just think they want a bigger slice of the pie.
|
|
|
19 Jul 2006, 01:09 (Ref:1659598) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 186
|
Have more races, get more TV time, get more people in to the races. would help.
|
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 01:26 (Ref:1659608) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 02:03 (Ref:1659622) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 314
|
You could have picked that this was coming.
They need to go back to "production car" racing. |
||
__________________
Bring racing back to Australian RACE TRACKS, leave the streets to all other motorists |
19 Jul 2006, 02:09 (Ref:1659625) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
Yes I agree totally I mean what does it cost to build a competitive race car (V8 Supercar) nowadays Surely the cost of an XR8 or SS with a few mods would be way cheaper for everyone...and with enough advertising and publicity be every bit as popular as the NASCAR wanna be's |
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 02:37 (Ref:1659635) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 844
|
perhaps, much to Tony's distaste, the amount of money sponsors are injecting into teams is the true indicator of the market value of the series.
Not the gate-takings or tv advertising revenue which we hear about almost daily. when it gets right down to the nuts and bolts of it - no cars - no series, so no gates or tv either, so the absolutley essential life-line of money is in sponsorship. Why are our teams not getting enough? I'm sure they'd be asking for it - but receiving it is a whole different animal. For the manufacturers to come out and say they are still propping teams up to the point some wouldn't be there if they didn't get that help, then that says to me that the corporations of Australia don't think it's giving the return in the same proportion that VESA would have us beleive it should be..... |
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 03:01 (Ref:1659643) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
It sounds like the writing is probably on the wall.
The traditional six/eight Aussie sedan market is on the decline, and increasing petrol prices are about to make the whole situation worse. The series will be limp without the huge financial inputs from Ford & Holden. |
|
|
19 Jul 2006, 03:18 (Ref:1659647) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Increasing fuel prices are not going to stop people from aspiring to own a V8 and that certainly doesn't mean they want to see 4 pots racing just because fuel has gone up. We went down that road in the late 80's/early 90's and the fans didn't like it. Also I think this is more of a Ford/Holden marketing exercise rather than a Falcon/Commodore one, much like Nascar.
In terms of sponsorship, I'm sure many companies would love to be involved, but i can bet not many can toss several million in the ring year after year, in other words the asking price is too high. The solution may be what Tasman is doing, in rotating the primary sponsors around. I won't be surprised to see TC continue to shop foreign markets like China to broaden opportunities. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
19 Jul 2006, 03:42 (Ref:1659655) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"...full of sound and fury, yet signifying nothing...." |
19 Jul 2006, 04:04 (Ref:1659665) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,539
|
what an optimist ...
Quote:
What slice of the pie do the manufacturers get now Oaksy ??? |
|||
__________________
more torque than a climate change conference |
19 Jul 2006, 04:15 (Ref:1659668) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 04:34 (Ref:1659674) | #13 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why not go down the NASCAR route? It would cost less money to build a car from scratch & hang the panels on the outside, then it would developing a road car into a race car (i.e.,turning a "Pigs ear into silk purse"). I personally think that they need to stop messing with stupid things like CPS, reverse grids & contrived points systems. How about real races that require real pit stops? I also think that the series may need an overhaul on exposure & promotion. The move to c7 may account for this |
||||
|
19 Jul 2006, 04:39 (Ref:1659675) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,033
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
. . . »-(¯`v´¯)-»........................The retro report........................©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~ Disclaimer; the above is pure speculation and only posted for entertainment purposes!!! |
19 Jul 2006, 04:59 (Ref:1659677) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
Around the time the V8 Supercar series started, the six/eight Aussie sedan market represented one in three vehicles sold in Australia; it now represents less than one in seven. |
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 05:00 (Ref:1659678) | #16 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
What is it now, a 120 litre tank. Half it and for the shorter races (still keep the big tank for bathurst,sandown etc) and use a 60 litre tank. The cost of a new tank would be hardly anything and it would stop everyone pulling into the pits on lap 5. They would have to use stratergy when to pit so they could still make the end with fuel remaining. |
|||
|
19 Jul 2006, 05:02 (Ref:1659679) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,539
|
the postive spin ....
Quote:
Obviously dear Oaky, the manufacturers are speaking for themselves, BUT.... and it is a big but, if the cash flow is positive you would want more, if it is negative you will be looking to minimise it. It is undoubtedly a negative cash flow exacerbated by very soft new car sales. How are the fairies at bottom of the garden today !! |
|||
__________________
more torque than a climate change conference |
19 Jul 2006, 05:53 (Ref:1659695) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,033
|
|||
__________________
. . . »-(¯`v´¯)-»........................The retro report........................©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~ Disclaimer; the above is pure speculation and only posted for entertainment purposes!!! |
19 Jul 2006, 06:18 (Ref:1659701) | #19 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 06:20 (Ref:1659702) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 07:25 (Ref:1659726) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,269
|
let's stop for a second -
We have a category that has XR8's and SS's. We have a Category that has GTS's and GT's. We have a category of utes that have SS's and XR8's. What is needed is someone to have the balls to 100% get behind these categories, OR we need a production based series that allows some serious mods (ala GP C.) So, let's look at it. Take an SS/XR8. Dump a hot engine into it, strip all the weight out of it, put a holinger into it an tune it. Slap some big wheels onto it and some other go fast bits. I reckon you would get some fast cars (yes, not as quick as the V8s currently) that would be a little delicate and fun to watch. It also forces the manufacturers to release an "SS Group "X"" or an "XR8 Group "X"" that has the go hard bits but smaller tyres and less mods - but most importantly the fast body kit. It annoys me that people keep referencing to the fact tat we need production racing - We have it! if you want it, get behind it! |
||
|
19 Jul 2006, 09:06 (Ref:1659807) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,382
|
It would be fair to say that the marketing budgets of both Manufacturers have taken a hit as the main marketing focus switches from large cars to small cars.
I honestly don't think there are too many teams out there that would survive without any support from the manufacturer at all. Which team do you guys on the forum think would attract the most non-manufacturer income ? |
|
__________________
... without motorsport, what is sport? |
19 Jul 2006, 09:41 (Ref:1659824) | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
WPS i reckon
|
|
|
19 Jul 2006, 09:43 (Ref:1659827) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
can we get the same safety factor oout of a production car? i just think that nothing will ruin the series quicker than a few fatalities
|
|
|
19 Jul 2006, 10:40 (Ref:1659869) | #25 | |||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 46,835
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B.A.R Factory Tour | Stephen Green | Marshals Forum | 11 | 2 Jun 2005 09:27 |
Factory Support | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 7 | 15 Apr 2004 04:56 |
Factory 996 GT2 | simon c | Sportscar & GT Racing | 15 | 16 Feb 2004 14:55 |
Ice Factory | rlinter | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 2 Jun 2003 12:18 |
V8 Factory teams | Crash Test | Touring Car Racing | 5 | 30 Mar 2000 07:39 |