![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lola B09/00 2009 spec .
http://www.endurance-info.com/2009_L...aLMP2_2009.jpg
I found this pic on Endurance-Info . Its the new Lola B09 . I thought it might be an idea to have a dedicated thread as the discussion would get lost in the LMS thread . The wing doesnt look as bad as I first thought , but it is still horrible . Could this version be the KSM car with the single intake on the left rear ? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm pretty sure it's generic for a turbo 4cyl car, so it could just as easily be any Mazda car - Dyson or RML for instance.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
![]() ![]() |
Dyson doesn't have the new wing...
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
![]() ![]() ![]() |
But you and I know they'll have the rest.
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
![]() |
Dyson doesn't need the new wing as they're in P2 in the ALMS.
On a side note, remember when the GTPs first started? They all had wings shorter than the width of the car. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's exactly why they'll have the rest. One '09 spec Lola and one '08 that has been mentioned many times as awaiting its ''09 updates. The aerodynamic benefits of the rest of the rear bodywork surely mean it will be included. Not sure I'm wild about the looks of it, but if it's faster...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Plus Dyson's 2nd chassis, the new non BK car, if in 09 spec will still be eligible for an auto-invite to Le Mans in 10'. Mazda and Dyson have said they would like to go. I think we will see both in 09' spec for Sebring. Also as cmk pointed out, it has been stated that the ex-BK chassis is awaiting 09 updates.
![]() L.P. ![]() Last edited by HORNDAWG; 3 Feb 2009 at 02:06. |
||
![]() |
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,115
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,666
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why the difference in the air inlets for this versus the over the windscreen intakes I've seen on other Lolas? Is there a P2 rule for the single intake, or is that a turbo requirement?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
![]() |
Turbo inlets are closer to the turbos...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
![]() |
Quote:
I think the Lola is so far the best looking narrow wing LMP. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
L.P. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent ![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Last edited by Canada ALMS fan; 3 Feb 2009 at 05:04. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmm, let me try again. I do not think there will be an update in aero for the old style wing! All effort will be put forth on the new rules spec wing and the aero adjustment to optimize it. Once again it will only be for a single P-2 chassis (ex-BK) unless Dyson bought an 08 spec chassis, which I doubt.
L.P. ![]() |
||
![]() |
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent ![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
![]() |
Wonder why Racing Box got B08/80 chassis then.. Cheaper?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
L.P. ![]() Last edited by HORNDAWG; 3 Feb 2009 at 14:49. |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,589
![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
__________________
Le Mans Christian Bakkerud, Team Kolles Formula Renault 2.0 NEC Mikkel Mac DTC Martin Marrill, M-Sport ![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I wouldnt say there was much price differance between a B08 & a B09 .
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
![]() ![]() ![]() |
As seen in these larger pictures posted by deggis in the LMS thread ,
http://www.endurance-info.com/2009_L...LolaRML_01.jpg http://www.endurance-info.com/2009_L...LolaRML_02.jpg http://www.endurance-info.com/2009_L...LolaRML_03.jpg It seem that the larger rear fender opening is completely screened already. I am guessing that it will recieve an eyebrow tail light assembly, ala the ARX-01's, to maximize pressure relief under the wing to maximize the downforce created by the smaller wing (?). According to Art. 8.3.2 b1 & b2 pg 13 the tail lights must be as wide as the rear track and as high up on the car as possible. L.P. ![]() |
||
![]() |
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent ![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
![]() |
Looks like theres a second, smaller intake below the main turbo intake on the RML car. That's a new development for 09 I think.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ACO Spec Vs. FIA GT Spec | jhansen | Sportscar & GT Racing | 14 | 14 Apr 2005 19:31 |
ETCC Spec gain 25kgs/Weight increase for ETCC-spec cars [merged] | touringcarnut | Touring Car Racing | 7 | 28 Apr 2004 13:35 |
BTCC Spec/ETCC Spec Cars at Media Day | Cosworth_RS | Touring Car Racing | 2 | 17 Mar 2004 22:06 |
Seat spec | coxmattycox | Touring Car Racing | 1 | 18 Nov 2003 18:04 |
Spec bodies | Crash Test | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 7 | 29 Apr 2000 15:42 |