|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Feb 2010, 18:02 (Ref:2633918) | #1 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 44
|
Why don't F1 cars have HUDs?
Quote:
BMW made one for Ralf Schumacher's helmet in 2002 but then what happened? It looks pretty basic but here's a pic: I'm hoping for something like this: |
|||
|
15 Feb 2010, 22:31 (Ref:2634047) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,254
|
would a HUD display not impare the drivers vision exactly where they need to see, i.e directly infront of them?
as it is most drivers will only glace occasionally at the information whereas the warning lights will be seen in their periferal vision |
||
__________________
never eat belly button fluff |
15 Feb 2010, 23:05 (Ref:2634067) | #3 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Flashy. But what exactly would be the point though?
|
|
|
15 Feb 2010, 23:23 (Ref:2634072) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,060
|
Didn't Herbert and Zanardi use HUD at Lotus in 1993?
|
|
__________________
All the same, isn't there a grand oul stretch in the evenings... |
16 Feb 2010, 02:15 (Ref:2634139) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Vision is limited enough in an F1 car anyway. Taking up space with graphics displaying non-vital information (and vital is probably best defined as "Where does the track go?" and "Where are the other cars?") doesn't seem like a good idea.
|
|
|
16 Feb 2010, 02:20 (Ref:2634143) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,107
|
The only useful information I can see a HUD displaying is things like oil, yellow flag zones, accident locations and so on. But they get all that information over radio or track side flags anyway, so what's the point? All a HUD is going to do is make the car/helmet a little bit heavier.
If it aint broke, don't fix it and I there are better things for the teams to spend money on. |
||
|
16 Feb 2010, 08:54 (Ref:2634238) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Trackside flags are now shown by in-cockpit lights, too.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
16 Feb 2010, 09:59 (Ref:2634266) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 183
|
The HUD would have to be in the helmet, as the cars don't have much in the way of windscreens. that puts more weight in the helmet and more stress on the drivers necks when cornering.
Distraction could also be a big issue. I believe that the Dakar Rally cars have most of the dials/waring lights in front of the co-driver for precisely this reason. |
||
|
16 Feb 2010, 10:09 (Ref:2634271) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
|
So this is why Ralfy was slow? I heard hands on the steering wheel was a much quicker way to drive.
Last edited by nea; 16 Feb 2010 at 10:10. Reason: Guff BBcode |
||
|
16 Feb 2010, 11:41 (Ref:2634308) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,136
|
I'm sure the drivers know perfectly well what corner they are driving around without having to have some more techno rubbish! :P
|
||
__________________
A touring car and sportscar forum poster. The F1 sub forum is terrible! :P |
17 Feb 2010, 17:23 (Ref:2635049) | #11 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
I watched the America's Cup races. (Downright thrilling, BTW. Spectacular boats!) The skipper of USA 17, James Spithill, was using a HUD built into a pair of sunglasses. How large or heavy could sunglasses be? He wore a laptop in a backpack to drive the HUD, but I don't think the display itself was very heavy at all. Apparently, HUD technology has come a long way while I wasn't looking. Tom |
|||
|
23 Feb 2010, 18:03 (Ref:2639217) | #12 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 44
|
so it is legal then but teams stick to the "if it's not broke, don't fix it" philosophy?
|
||
|
23 Feb 2010, 18:35 (Ref:2639241) | #13 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Feb 2010, 18:42 (Ref:2639243) | #14 | |||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
25 Feb 2010, 07:54 (Ref:2640169) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 335
|
|||
|
25 Feb 2010, 14:26 (Ref:2640369) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
25 Feb 2010, 23:07 (Ref:2640611) | #17 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
I read up more and yep, the helmet itself was Schuberth. "The system is located in the peripheral vision field of the driver's dominant eye. Thanks to the unique design of the system, the information is projected into the driver's field of vision without his having to actually look at the display. 'The eye very quickly gets used to this small spot and ignores it as if it were a tiny insect on the windscreen,' explains J'rgen Br'gl, project engineer at the BMW office in Palo Alto.'" That's pretty cool. (both quotes from http://www.gizmag.com/go/1468/) |
|||
|
26 Feb 2010, 02:08 (Ref:2640664) | #18 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
It's likely that Spithill's HUD sunglasses and Schumacher's helmet HUD have a common heritage. Quote:
When the commentator mentioned Spithill's HUD, I'd assumed that the system was the result of a large R&D effort, solely for the boat, pushing forward the state of the art. It sounds like they might have simply grabbed an existing off-the-shelf system instead. Very interesting! |
||||
|
1 Mar 2010, 10:44 (Ref:2642552) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
The America's cup is turning in to a bit of a travesty really. The only competition is how much money you can throw at it (ring any bells). The boats should really be identical (or built to spec rules). That's the only way to have any sort of relevancy in the race.
|
||
__________________
Locost #54 Boldly Leaping where no car has gone before. And then being T-boned. Damn. Survivor of the 2008 2CV 24h!! 2 engines, one accident, 76mph and rain. |
1 Mar 2010, 20:39 (Ref:2642911) | #20 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 87
|
I know that in aircraft that are so equipped, the HUD symbology is focused at infinity preventing the pilot from refocusing as s/he switches scan from inside to cockpit to out front and vice versa. My understanding is that the systems used for road going vehichles are limited in this fashion. Perhaps for F1 its just not worth it?
Obi |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GP2: Expand entry so 'F1' drivers don't intefere with young guns prospects? | hotwheels | National & International Single Seaters | 33 | 15 Oct 2006 19:37 |
F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars | Mark Stevens | Formula One | 8 | 21 May 2004 18:10 |
Don't Panic,Don't Panic,Ferrari were only 34 seconds ahead of the rest of the feild. | Armco Bender | Formula One | 40 | 8 Mar 2004 18:55 |
late 1949 F1 GPs & TATRA's F1 Cars | hyphen | Motorsport History | 21 | 12 Jan 2003 13:10 |
Why don't they turbocharge the BTCT cars? | Sodemo | Touring Car Racing | 19 | 28 Apr 2001 14:15 |