|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Nov 2002, 12:51 (Ref:421347) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
CART's Official Explanation for Surfers
I got this from a friend named Margot Orenchuk. I think it makes good sense.
here is a response from CART after I sent them a message complaining about the Honda Indy 300, they manage to make it sound reasonably good, but I still think they should've done better... Hello, Thank you for your comments. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. We wanted to discuss the topic with CART before providing you with a response. Cars are not required to pit once the white flag is shown. The white flag is only displayed after the competitors have completed the required number of pit stops (in this case three based on the original race length of 70 laps). Thus, the white flag would not be displayed in the shortened race no matter if it was going to be 50 laps, 41 laps or 36 laps and the cars would have to satisfy the maximum pit interval rule. To satisfy the rule, the cars must cross start/finish in pit lane on or before their scheduled pit stop lap. In the case of this race, cars 39 and 11 would have been required to cross start/finish in pit lane on or before Lap 36. The goal of a race is to complete the race as quickly as possible, but not to end the race as soon as possible. In this case, every effort was made to continue the race until Lap 50 as declared before the restart of the race. To arbitrarily end the race any sooner than necessary would have been unfair. Once it was clear that the weather was not going to allow a return to green flag racing and that conditions would not allow the completion of the race, race control attempted to complete 41 laps conditions permitting. This would ensure that every competitor had to make at least the required number of pit stops (2) and thus had the same opportunity to pass or be passed while making a pit stop. Some competitors gambled that the race would end on Lap 36, others gambled that the race would go longer. No competitor was actually penalized for extending the race, although they were not rewarded for their pit strategy which is what they were hoping for. Some competitors took more than the required 2 pit stops. The race was not stopped as soon as it was technically possible to do so. With the wet track conditions and diminishing daylight, the race would not be able to run to the schedule 50 laps. The choice of Lap 41 was made to ensure that all competitors would make at least the required minimum number of pit stops. As always, the goal was conditional on it being safe to do so. As it turned out, the race was called on Lap 40 because of darkness. Sorry, Mikey. It wasn't a conspiracy to make you look bad. Sorry, Dario, it wasn't to punish you for being a stupid git. It was just a boring old adminstrative decision. |
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
4 Nov 2002, 16:31 (Ref:421520) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Tommy Kendall needs to be told to stop with all of the mentioning of "questionable officiating". How many times did he bring that up during the three days of Fontana broadcasts? Too many, in my opinion. CART needs good PR right now as much as they need anything else. Hard to build a fanbase when even the announcers are slamming the sanctioning body. If he were PT, he'd be fined.
|
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
4 Nov 2002, 18:10 (Ref:421602) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
G*d punished him by giving him laryngitis. But I agree, it was not "questionable officiating" because the decision of the officials is final. In hockey he'd get a major for "unsportsmanlike conduct".
|
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
7 Nov 2002, 10:46 (Ref:423670) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 174
|
Sorry Liz,but everyone knows that's bull****.See you at Indy.
|
||
|
7 Nov 2002, 10:52 (Ref:423675) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
Geez, another IRL idiot?
Go join rush1 in your love for the invisible sport, why don't you, and leave us with the real motor racing. |
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
7 Nov 2002, 10:54 (Ref:423679) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 174
|
After reading some of the posts on this "forum",I'd call laryngitis a welcome case of constipation.
|
||
|
7 Nov 2002, 11:46 (Ref:423707) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
The forums were divided so that people could discuss their favourite series without the other side coming in and peeing all over their Cheerios. I don't go into your forums so I don't know if anyone from CART goes regularly into the IRL forum to say "Your Series is Trash". I hope they don't.
But if you don't find the posts on this forum entertaining, you know what the answer is. Either post something positive and entertaining ABOUT CART, or go across the road. |
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
simple explanation request | climb | Announcements and Feedback | 9 | 12 Jan 2004 13:08 |
Vegas explanation | indycool | ChampCar World Series | 3 | 3 Oct 2003 21:40 |
Seatbelt failure, still seems to be a real possible explanation for the death of DE | Joe Fan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 26 | 19 Aug 2001 00:36 |
Higher wing did'nt mak F1 slower, explanation by an expert...... | steve nielsen | Formula One | 1 | 31 Mar 2001 02:56 |
Explanation on Rubens first corner bumps | racer10 | Formula One | 5 | 23 Mar 2001 09:08 |