Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 Feb 2005, 12:28 (Ref:1222901)   #1
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dynamometers

Silly question of the day time, but can anyone tell me what a dyno actually measures? Is it force or torque??? I would have thought being a rotating device it is torque, but I could also convince myself the opposite too, especially since the "torque" measurement is usually given in Newtons (not Nm) and described as "tractive effort".
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Feb 2005, 13:15 (Ref:1222939)   #2
Revracing
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Kent
Posts: 142
Revracing should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A simple engine Dyno will measure the "braking" torque of an engine at a given RPM, more complex systems are able to generate Brake torque curves. Power is derived from torque and RPM.
Revracing is offline  
__________________
"Racing is life, anything before or after is just waiting"

Steve McQueen
Quote
Old 11 Feb 2005, 13:41 (Ref:1222950)   #3
Dave Brand
Veteran
 
Dave Brand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
Hadfield, Derbyshire (UK)
Posts: 6,359
Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!Dave Brand is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnh875
Silly question of the day time, but can anyone tell me what a dyno actually measures? Is it force or torque???
The basic measurement will be force - the very primitive dynos I used at college in the 1960s used a spring balance on the end of an arm. The measured force mutiplied by the length of the arm gives torque, add in rev/min & you get bhp.

Quote:
I would have thought being a rotating device it is torque, but I could also convince myself the opposite too, especially since the "torque" measurement is usually given in Newtons (not Nm) and described as "tractive effort".
Tractive effort & torque are two different things. Tractive effort was commonly used for measuring the performance of steam locos where a dyno car was coupled to the loco; tractive effort is the force at the coupling.

In car terms, tractive effort can be a useful measure - it is the force seen at the tyre/road interface, & is therefore a direct measure of the force available to overcome the various resistances & to accelerate the vehicle.
Dave Brand is offline  
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person.
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2005, 04:49 (Ref:1225871)   #4
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok, that's the understanding I had of the dyno operation. So the tractive effort measurement would have to be derived from the torque measured (easy as you know the diameter of the roller). Given you are usually interested in the output of the engine the torque reading would be of more use even if you have to calculate back through the final drive & gearbox ratios to get to the engine figure (and allow for parasitic losses which is where the whole thing gets hazy just like deriving engine output from chassis dyno readings…)

Dave that’s an interesting bit of trivia. I read about testing done a government agency that used to test tractors here in Aust and give official power ratings for both drawbar hp and belt hp – back when it was common for tractors to be used to drive machinery via belts, ie long before the term “government agency” was invented!
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Feb 2005, 04:58 (Ref:1225874)   #5
dtype38
Race Official
Veteran
 
dtype38's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
East London
Posts: 2,479
dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!dtype38 has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnh875
Given you are usually interested in the output of the engine the torque reading would be of more use even if you have to calculate back through the final drive & gearbox ratios to get to the engine figure (and allow for parasitic losses which is where the whole thing gets hazy just like deriving engine output from chassis dyno readings…)
Last rolling road run I did had an electic dyno on it. The car was run up to full power then the tester lifted off and jabbed the clutch in. The dyno then measured the torque absorbed on the overrun as the power train slowed down again. The dyno computer then back calculated what the engine torque and power must have been. A reasonably accurate figure I think if the machine is well calibrated.

Last edited by dtype38; 15 Feb 2005 at 04:59.
dtype38 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Feb 2005, 14:10 (Ref:1233525)   #6
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Put simply they measure torque
From that (and knowing the revs) HP can be calculated
RWC is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.