|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Mar 2001, 17:53 (Ref:70497) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 567
|
Great news. Maybe he's "seen the light," although he claims it's not a political statement on either series. In any case, it rounds out the field for the longer endurance races with a quality team with proven world class driver
http://www.theracesite.com/index.cfm...m_article=1585 |
||
|
18 Mar 2001, 22:52 (Ref:72569) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 567
|
Well, mixed results I guess. Seeing it was a brand new car with little(no?) testing, it was a decent result(23rd OA, 6th in class), and they lasted 7+ hrs. Then again, in fastest race lap, they were 4 secs off the pace of the fastest audi. But there does seem to be potential, but Dyson must run every round of alms if he hopes to compete in selected events. We saw it with caddy. You can't exspect to develop a car by only cherry picking, you have to commit to a full season like audi did in 99. And if Dyson did commit to a full season, I think next year they could be competing for podiums. Let's not forget they were the 99 alms champs, if they put their effort behind the car into developing it, it could surpirse a few people. They could even still race grand-am at the same time(unless of any scheduling conflicts, of which i am not aware), just commit to both alms and garra
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should ALMS go for less races...? | GT-Eins | North American Racing | 33 | 4 Aug 2004 23:28 |
Dyson to contest Mosport, MO ALMS rounds | Heeltoe6 | North American Racing | 9 | 22 Aug 2001 11:23 |
ALMS should be divided into seperate races..... | Geva racing | North American Racing | 6 | 15 Sep 2000 13:39 |
ALMS races on infield road coures | Jared | North American Racing | 8 | 12 Sep 2000 23:26 |