|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
19 Jan 2012, 18:13 (Ref:3014204) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 226
|
2012 a tough year for Marshals?
Interesting articles on Page 77 of this weeks Autosport.
Seems to be common theme that organisers are trying to cram more track activity into the racing day. From the racers point of view this means races may be sacrificed if the timetable falls behind. From our point of view this means more intense days with minimal, if any, breaks. Organisers will pressure marshals to clear up incidents faster than ever. We stand a greater chance of falling foul of bad weather and being in position on duty for longer spells increase the chances of suffering from 'Marshals Leg'. As a flaggie I find that on cold days a sudden burst of yellow can strain the muscles. Rather like running without some sort of warm up. Rather surprisingly, Adrian Fawdington of Castle Combe is quoted '..marshals will run through without a lunch break' Wouldn't expect this from a respected fellow unless they were desperate. Last year HSCC scheduled 40min lunch breaks but the majority of days resulted in next to no lunch breaks as the time was used to absorb lateness from the morning. I took this up with Graeme White, HSCC Race Director, along with a few others. We were accused of being 'occasional whingers' and 'most marshals seemed not to mind'. I beg to differ with Graeme and I know there have been a few comments on this forum about the lack of down time. Personally I suffer from fatigue especially when, as commonly happens, I flag alone. I know by late afternoon I'm flagging in the other sense! Where there are sufficient Marshals to organise a stand down this will be less of a problem but how often does this happen? Maybe we should be happy with a few more races with half a dozen cars to fill the day! So do we face the inevitable or start making noises before more folk decide it simply isn't worth it and hang up their probans? David Morgan |
|
__________________
Flaggie - constantly trying to get it right but often failing. Try it some time. |
19 Jan 2012, 19:57 (Ref:3014242) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
|
2012 a tough year for marshals
Regarding lunch breaks for marshals. What must be remembered is, although we are volunteers, we have the same rights as if we were paid. It all boils down to a 'duty of care'. If an incident occurs towards the end of the day, because a marshal has been on duty for an excessive amount of hours, it would undoubtedly be difficult to find an answer in any enquiry.
I am sure that an experienced Clerk of the Course would accept that it is vital for the safe running of a meeting, to ensures that the marshals are able to do their work to the best of their ability. Unfortunately, the MSA are not very helpful on this subject, there is nothing in the 'Blue book' to address this other than E 11.1, which doesnt really apply. There have been a number of e-mails between myself and the MSA regarding this, but obviously they are unwilling to put any ruling on paper. Ultimately, i suppose, it is up to a 'strong' Chief Marshal to order his marshals to stand down if the worst comes to the worst. Hopefully, that will never happen. |
|
|
19 Jan 2012, 21:28 (Ref:3014279) | #3 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 94
|
Read the article in Autosport with a sense of dread. The lunch break is effectively lost earnings for the organising club and it seems simple to cut down on this. I guess as cash becomes tighter for more and more of us when we read a timetable with a 30 minute lunch break (which is effectively 20 to allow for getting on to post 10 mins before start of afternoon) the dread will result in marshals voting with their feet and sending the tickets back. Sometimes losing most of lunch is accepted due to circumstances (Mazdas at OP with 26 tyre wall rebuilds last year spring to mind) but if it happens week in week out.
Whilst the comments about rotation and marshals standing down could occur at bigger meetings for many meetings this could be very difficult to arrange, particularly where marshal numbers may be low. Would be interesting to hear whether this issue has been raised with the BMMC at any stage in respect of planning for 2012. It may also be an issue for all of us to ensure any concerns are raised with the BMMC Circuit reps. |
||
|
20 Jan 2012, 20:02 (Ref:3014692) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
Yes it has on may occasions. The BMMC and the Circuits are not resposible of the timetables, these are set by the clubs. The BMMC have passed on thier members concerns to the clubs that have schedulled short lunches, but are powerless to force a change. |
|||
__________________
Allan (Fazza) Farrimond |
20 Jan 2012, 22:16 (Ref:3014753) | #5 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 94
|
Thanks Fazza
|
||
|
19 Jan 2012, 22:29 (Ref:3014304) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,045
|
I see very little difference with marshalling long days in the 70's as today, it is your choice if you do it or not, so what is the problem, after all you still have the best seat in the house for free, please don't whinge..............enjoy it
Bladders............. Last edited by M Greenslade; 19 Jan 2012 at 22:34. |
||
__________________
Life is for living, it is later than you think….. |
19 Jan 2012, 23:06 (Ref:3014322) | #7 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,447
|
Been there before. The problem was a lot decided not to do it any more and others didn't start. And then it's 'who'd have thought it, not enough marshals' with the corresponding additional delays because not enough people to clear up and deal with incidents, etc, etc.
Quote:
The same economic downturn that's going to affect the number of drivers is probably going to affect the number of marshals. So how about fewer, less niche races with more cars in them to make it both more profitable and more interesting? I for one will be very careful about where I'm committing my time this year, and fail to consider my welfare and fail to entertain me, I'll be going elsewhere. |
|||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
20 Jan 2012, 05:51 (Ref:3014402) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 653
|
Quote:
At any rate, volunteering at events is not free by any stretch of the imagination. Some guys commute a few miles while others like myself choose to go for thousands of miles. (Australia/Malaysia/Singapore) Its a great opportunity to do something that I haven't done before. That being said, I have yet to find a marshal that was thrilled with the way events are run... whether in Singapore or now in New Zealand everyone has a word or two to say how things could be better. And so far in NZ I've witnessed shortages of marshals on a number of occasions. So I guess depending where you are on the food chain, you can make plenty of noise about how things are done. Personally, I'm just happy to have an opportunity to do this. As someone said above: I get the best seat in the house |
|||
|
20 Jan 2012, 11:14 (Ref:3014485) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 421
|
I personally am not bothered about getting a lunch break,The five ten or even fifteen mins break we get in between races is enough fro me.
I enjoy being occupied all the time I'm there. I know that does not suit everyone. Mick |
||
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, This is why some people appear bright, until they speak. Salad is what real food eats. |
20 Jan 2012, 11:51 (Ref:3014508) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 391
|
Fine if you do get a break between races, which is not always the case, with some clubs abandoning the course car between races, and if you are near a decent toilet when nature calls!
|
||
|
20 Jan 2012, 12:11 (Ref:3014520) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,124
|
Quote:
I'm really not bothered about looking round paddocks at lunchtimes! A racing car is not a racing car when it's not racing |
|||
__________________
27 Years In Orange |
20 Jan 2012, 00:43 (Ref:3014348) | #12 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 359
|
The first time I did some marshalling in the early 90s was at a meeting where there were not enough marshals to run it, so they had to drag in a bunch of us hangers-on from the paddock to make up the numbers. And that was a 750MC meeting where the marshals are always treated rather well. I'm not sure we'll get to that again soon but any suggestion that marshals should regularly expect to be on post in all weathers for 10 hours or so without any breaks will certainly go a fair way to making it happen.
OTOH the few clubbie meetings I did last year were mostly so inundated with marshals that this year I've been specifically looking for meetings where I might actually be a bit more useful. But I guess having almost too many volunteers is not a particularly common problem. Or is it ? Steve |
||
|
20 Jan 2012, 11:57 (Ref:3014514) | #13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,155
|
I was typing something earlier about there being a spread of people being involved, and Mick has very succinctly demonstrated it.
Some people want or need a break (or more than one), especially during a long day. Some people don't. However this isn't simply about marshals "on the bank", is it? What about the timekeepers, radio/telephony folks, specialists in pits/assembly/paddock, rescue units, recovery units, scrutineers, stewards...? I think David has raised a very interesting point, and it isn't one that has an obvious answer really. If there are enough of us to go round ("us" meaning *all* the officials of a meeting) then we can rotate, stand down, have a break. If there aren't, then we can't. Clarification is needed as to whether: 1. We should (and this is where "I want to" and "I don't want to" come in) 2. We can (i.e. are there enough people to make it possible) 3. We have a "right" to ...which ultimately leads to the conclusion that if you know you're not going to get a break, and you're the type of person who wants or needs one, you won't volunteer for a certain club/meeting/circuit. Aaaaand we end up right back in the position Woolley mentioned above. Speaking from a purely personal point of view, if I end up feeling like somebody/club is taking the pee, I'll stop going. It hasn't happened yet (well... maybe it has, actually, but not in these terms!), but there again I'm a mere whippersnapper in marshalling experience. |
|
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
20 Jan 2012, 12:01 (Ref:3014515) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,697
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Comments made are personal and don't reflect any club or Motorsport UK policy. "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein |
20 Jan 2012, 13:26 (Ref:3014550) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,447
|
Simple fact is that if the clubs would concentrate on filling up their grids better instead of running an ever increasing number of races with poor grids, this wouldn't be a problem. If you need 300 cars to break even, it's a simple matter of economics that you can do that with either a few well-supported races or with a lot of under-supported ones.
Unfortunately, they seem to want to go the other way with lots of niche races, and because we cost the same however long we're their (generally nothing anyway) the easy solution is to take advantage of us instead of dealing with the actual problem. Racing in this country is badly fragmented and run too much for vested interests to the detriment of the sport as a whole. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
20 Jan 2012, 14:53 (Ref:3014578) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 905
|
Woolley, I just have to agree wholeheartedly with the line....
"the easy solution is to take advantage of us instead of dealing with the actual problem" Small grids for long races (the BARC Chevron series is a good example) is my main bugbear. I don't mind late finishes on a SATURDAY but on Sundays where I have a fair drive home and work the next day is a no no. Why do clubs seem fit to introduce brand new series when they are running established series with barely enough cars to call it a race? I said I would do less meetings this year but in having started planning I find I have put down about the same number! These will HAVE to be whittled down as with the ever spiralling fuel costs I can no longer afford to marshal every weekend. There also seems a lot less clubbie meetings. 750MC have said they have cut back on meetings and at my local track Mallory there are no BRSCC meetings (Oct 7th is HRDC) this year, no Masters meeting , no VSCC meeting, no HSCC meeting, only one 750 meeting and BARC, the circuits "resident" club, have only two meetings if you don't count the Plum Pudding which is shared with bikes and only has only a couple of races! Could this be because Mallory has an early curfew........?????? Could the loss of the 750 meeting at Oulton Park be due in part to the prohibition of Sunday racing? I think the time where the usual trait of a marshal to grin and bare whatever the organizers decide to throw at them is sadly coming to an end. |
||
__________________
Been there, done that, got the avatar (Just a night out with The Lads!) “Beer is not the answer........Beer is the question .........The answer is yes.” |
20 Jan 2012, 16:00 (Ref:3014605) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,697
|
You have to remember that Mallory is primarily a bike circuit, all ways was and all ways will be. Every weekend of the season there is something on, just that the majority are 2 wheels rather than 4.
There are 2 two day car meetings again this year - CTRC on July 28/29 & CSCC on August 26/27 + the VSCC are coming on Sunday June 24th |
||
__________________
Comments made are personal and don't reflect any club or Motorsport UK policy. "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein |
20 Jan 2012, 16:35 (Ref:3014616) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 157
|
as greem quoted,
"However this isn't simply about marshals "on the bank", is it? What about the timekeepers, radio/telephony folks, specialists in pits/assembly/paddock, rescue units, recovery units, scrutineers, stewards...?" Sometimes these jobs/roles on a race meeting start before circuit action starts and after the last race of the day, and rememeber, it may be a free ticket! but a dangerous one if caught in line of fire of flying cars! (sorry, out of control cars), parts or tools! |
||
|
20 Jan 2012, 22:55 (Ref:3014770) | #19 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
But back to the quote above, one thing I never was interested in marshalling for was a free race ticket. I started to be involved in the sport I love and to contribute. I marshall to be on hand. And, as in the quote, we are there to help everyone else keep safe and by doing so put ourselves out there too. I'm there for the exact opposite of a day 'watching' motorsport. After buying a race suit, new boots, a box for my stuff, gloves and petrol I certainly haven't found it to be 'free' either! Thats before buying winter gear and all the other bits everyone seems to accrue. I suspect anyone getting involved for a free jolly at the races wouldn't last very long, with the investment in kit and the long days being constantly preppared for getting stuck in. So I would be very cross if any club/body ever suggested a marshal's voice on lunch breaks etc wasn't valid as he was having a free day out. Very angry indeed! |
|||
|
20 Jan 2012, 16:41 (Ref:3014620) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,155
|
As umpteen people before me have said in different places, "bring solutions, not problems".
We obviously have the latter. Now instead of bleating, how do *we* fix it? |
|
__________________
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes. When they realise you have, you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes. |
20 Jan 2012, 20:28 (Ref:3014699) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 863
|
One of the reasons I do so much marshalling in North America (apart from personal reasons) is that all the big meetings run a "time certain" timetable. If practice is red flagged the clock does not stop. If repair/clean up is required the clock does not stop.
It certainly means that most occasions we get a lunch break and finish on time. Also all meetings there publish the timetable well in advance. If it is an endurance race, yes it might well run into dark, but at least you are aware of that when you sign up. |
||
__________________
Play Safe, Bob The Race Gypsy |
21 Jan 2012, 00:26 (Ref:3014789) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,435
|
I think that is the key factor. In my view, the clubs that can provide indications as to meeting start and finish times and indeed lunch times (there are a few examples of this; for instance the CSCC) are particularly welcome. I have no particular problem in turning up for a meeting knowing that there will be lunch break and/or a late finish provided that such information is known in advance of volunteering and I've had the opportunity to weigh up such occurances with the quality of the racing on offer.
|
||
|
21 Jan 2012, 06:25 (Ref:3014836) | #23 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 157
|
Originally Posted by ChrisPage
But back to the quote above, one thing I never was interested in marshalling for was a free race ticket. The word "Free", does not describe that the day could start out as early as 5am! on a sunday, travel to a circuit, arrive 2 hrs (sometimes) before any track action, be on a promise of a lunch break, if your on a quiet posting, enjoy some close racing, then after its all finished, find your car, for the journey home, (sometimes cold and damp after the rain we stood in all day or hurting from the sunburn!), only to have a quick rest before back to work on monday morning. dont get me wrong, there is pros and cons about marshalling. but no amount of money can buy the friends that you meet along the way, the banter between friends and drivers (when in a good mood) you get at any circuit work hrs has stopped me from attending any meetings, but given the chance i would be back like a shot. working or not. |
||
|
21 Jan 2012, 10:57 (Ref:3014899) | #24 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 391
|
The last major exodus of marshals from our sport was in the late 1990’s, the reasons then much the same as now, i.e. lack of decent on-circuit facilities, timetabling, etc and at that time, petrol hitting £4 a gallon for the first time. (Wouldn’t we settle for that price now?!) There was another minor exodus in 2008 as the present financial crisis began to bite, camouflaged to a large extent by the ongoing success of various recruitment campaigns run by BMMC, supported by the MSA, BTCC and the circuit owners.
In October 2011, as we opened the renewal season for 2012, there were ominous signs that the financial crisis was now hitting everyone and there was an instant flutter of direct debit cancellations, plus statements on Ten-Tenths that many marshals would be cutting back or quitting altogether in 2012. We reported this to the Association of British Motor Racing Clubs. There was a sympathetic response, perhaps a little muted from the organising clubs who were already struggling to make money, but largely sympathetic nonetheless. The matter was further discussed within BMMC and a variety of reports and suggestions forwarded to the MSA. A summary of this situation is now on our web site www.marshals.co.uk for your information. (Great cartoon by Jim Bamber!) There is not a comment facility on our web site but I am happy to receive comments via the current thread on Ten-Tenths or by email to Nat.Treasurer@marshals.co.uk In trying to assess opinion, I suppose we must recognise that between the two extremes of those marshals who would marshal for ever for no reward, other than a job well done amidst a gang of good mates, and those who are now saying they simply cannot afford to continue, there is the great majority of marshals who do appreciate a little help from the clubs. Historically it is from this silent majority that most marshals simply drift away and although we can keep the numbers up by continued recruiting, this recruiting and the constant training of new marshals is not without cost to the sport as a whole. Our aim must be to retain a few more of those we already have; hence our suggestions to make the marshal feel a little more appreciated than is sometimes the case. George Copeland Marshals' & Officials' Rep on ABMRC Nat Treasurer BMMC Last edited by Stephen Green; 22 Jan 2012 at 08:40. |
||
|
21 Jan 2012, 11:33 (Ref:3014919) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,463
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Marshals trackdays 2012 | Mark Smith | Marshals Forum | 107 | 11 Feb 2012 17:43 |
toca make it tough on start and finish for marshals | motorsportmarshal61 | Marshals Forum | 65 | 1 Jul 2004 21:08 |
Brawn thinks that JPM is in for a tough year. | Mr V | Formula One | 39 | 30 Dec 2003 10:28 |
Tough year ahead for Jenson | Chris Strange | Formula One | 12 | 6 Nov 2000 12:28 |