|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Jul 2010, 10:16 (Ref:2722512) | #501 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Occasionally they used 3 drivers in the past: Capello/McNish/Pirro in 2008 and Biela/Pirro/Werner in 2006. However, I think you are right that Audi will stick to the 4 drivers.
Bernard and Dumas have a regular job as Porsche factory driver and Lotterer and Treluyer have their drives in Japan. Fassler and Luhr are pretty much unemployed for the rest of the year, except for some races in the R8 GT3. Will Luhr get another shot at a R15 seat this year? |
|
|
6 Jul 2010, 15:42 (Ref:2722642) | #502 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
The Race in Zhuhai China will be sstunning. As you can see Peugeot has sent a subtle message to Audi that they will win the last battle of this sportscar era before the new regulations. I don't doubt it.
The peugeot linup is Car1-Simon Pagenaud---------Sebastian Bourdais Car 2- Franck Montagny-----------Stephane Sarrazin Without a doubt the four fastest drivers that Peugeot has ever had. It is also the last race for the Peugeot 908. We will see the fastest peugeot 908 ever. Also look at that. The peugeot 908 is really going out with a bang. You might just say that Peugeot is having a going away party. The french peugeot 908 being driven by all french drivers in the last race for the 908. I think peugeot will go all out to embarrass audi after lemans. And theirs nothing audi can do about it. olivier Quesnel will say one thing to his drivers that weekend "Go!" |
|
|
6 Jul 2010, 19:23 (Ref:2722741) | #503 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 406
|
you mean like Le Mans?
Not sure I would make those predictions just yet. |
|
|
6 Jul 2010, 20:30 (Ref:2722772) | #504 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
With rumors of the hybrid 911 coming over for Petit, I wonder if Bernhard and Dumas may be assigned that ride.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2010, 22:31 (Ref:2722820) | #505 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
I don't think that Audi could give a rats arse about any potential embarrassment that Peugeot could possibly dish out. Audi have already won the big one, and in an extremely convincing way. Victories in any other events this year in LMS/LMIC will only be icing on the cake.
|
||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
6 Jul 2010, 22:44 (Ref:2722824) | #506 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
Of Course it's not Le Mans, but it's something!, otherwise Audi and especially Peugeot wouldn't race it! (as there is no gain, development wise, in racing the 908, which takes resources which could be used on 90X) But Peugeot dominating Audi!?, i don't think so! The R15+ is better at "normal" tracks, just see SPA. Also, Peugeot do NOT want to have a similar failure again (the Con Rods), so they will either go with slightly de-tuned engines, or not push as hard as they have been able to do earlier. The ILMC will be very interesting to follow, as it will be a close battle between Audi and Peugeot. I just hope that they can manage to do a quick deal so some one will broadcast all the races! |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
6 Jul 2010, 23:25 (Ref:2722831) | #507 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
6 Jul 2010, 23:34 (Ref:2722834) | #508 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
Last edited by Audi Racer; 6 Jul 2010 at 23:42. |
||
|
6 Jul 2010, 23:41 (Ref:2722835) | #509 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Jul 2010, 00:08 (Ref:2722839) | #510 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
7 Jul 2010, 01:46 (Ref:2722850) | #511 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Problem is, outside of Le Mans, Audi probably has the better car-they proved it in '09 at Sebring and PLM. The modified R15 dominated at Paul Ricard, even before Oreca's air jack problems, as the Audi had built up a 10 second lead, and from there the Pug struggled to match the Audi on a consistant basis.
And at Spa, Audi had little difficulty in the dry keeping up with the 908s, and if they ran a high downforce setup, they'd probably would've been faster. Peugeot, with slowed deveopment and probably having to re-think their engine package for the LMIC races(though those are shorter than Le Mans) are gonna have their hands full with Audi, since they can't just worry about Allan and Dindo alone-Le Mans proved that Audi can put any of their LM drivers into the second LMIC car and they'd have an equal chance as McNish and Capello. |
||
|
7 Jul 2010, 07:47 (Ref:2722906) | #512 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Audi and Peugeot hope that the ILMC will become something important which is why they have been pushing for its inception.
However right now ask either team or the board from either manufacturer which they would rather win and which matters most and I guarantee that they will all 100% say Le Mans. Hopefully ILMC will become something in the future but to imply it carries the same weight now is frankly ludicrous - the clue is in the name! |
||
|
7 Jul 2010, 13:08 (Ref:2723033) | #513 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
I don't share your optimism that Audi will easily be faster than Peugeot. The Peugeot has a serious engine advantage (if the conrods stay in one piece), so therefor they can run with more downforce than Audi. In the Porsche curves (sector 3) Peugeot was more than 1 sec faster than Audi. Peugeot will go flat out to win the cup and prove that they have the speed and reliability to beat Audi. |
||
|
7 Jul 2010, 13:57 (Ref:2723047) | #514 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,451
|
Good onya Peugeot! Who is in?
|
|
|
7 Jul 2010, 18:58 (Ref:2723168) | #515 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
I'm with chernaudi here and think that Audi has the slightly better car. If anything, the cars are more equally matched now than ever, but I give the advantage as a whole(team,etc) to Audi
|
||
|
8 Jul 2010, 00:54 (Ref:2723324) | #516 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Quote:
Also, the revised R15, by your own admission, was faster than the Oreca 908(which was in the same spec the factory cars would've been) at Paul Ricard and were just as fast in the race at Spa in spite of now running the optimal areo package. Chassis wise, the R15 is better for the ALMS/LMS type tracks, where the ability to change direction rapidly, weight distribution and cornering speed are just as if not more important than straightline speed, which the Audis lacked at LM even with the revised bodyword to equal the Pugs' downforce in the Porsche curves. Also, a 1-2 second gap at Le Mans is reduced to almost nothing at a shorter track, and the R15 dynamically was built for the shorter tracks. You can't exactly build a Le Mans special out of what has become an engored, diesel engined Porsche RS Spyder or Acura ARX-01(chassis dynamics speaking), both of which needed special bodywork to work at LM. Audi probably does have the better car for the LMIC races, as the Pug's power advantage means less at shorter racetracks where handling and agility becomes of equal or more importance. |
|||
|
8 Jul 2010, 06:51 (Ref:2723371) | #517 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Peugeot is not bad on slower tracks either. Remember 1000 km of Catalunya 2008 where the 908 dominated the old R10: http://www.lemans-series.com/en/s55_...=6&id_course=3 |
||||
|
9 Jul 2010, 09:24 (Ref:2723914) | #518 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
9 Jul 2010, 09:36 (Ref:2723927) | #519 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Marshall's comments don't go along with what Audi engineers said during Speed's broadcast and what I saw during the race--which is that the R15 lacks rear mechanical grip. But I guess that this is what happens when you end up with half a new car after a less than successful 2009 design.
But then again, let's look at the Acura ARX-02. That car had no reports of a lack of grip anywhere, and it uses a suspension system very similar to both versions of the Audi R15(pushrods, torsion bar springs, and a zero-keel layout). I don't know, but if Audi has front grip problems, do as Acura did, and put a 150-200lb piece of tungsten in the nose of the car! Or maybe Audi should ditch the 13.5 wheels and use 14 inch rims like Aston Martin does. Maybe this is a sign that Audi screwed up trying to design a downforce car for the ALMS and going too far. Did the Acura ARX-02(which the 2010 R15's areo seems to be largely based on and shares the zero-keel suspension layout with the R15) have any grip problems related to the areo or suspension? Or could this be that the Pug being a lead sled weight wise has actually helped them-the Panoz LMP was severely overweight compared to the R8, and it had just as good mechanical grip, though being front engined helped that. It's strange that the Audi R10 lacked front grip in certian conditons because of it's rearward weight bias and narrow front wheels and that Audi gave the R15 a near 50/50 front/rear weight distribution and wider wheels and is still having issues undercertian condtions. However, I've heard that a understeery car works better in faster corners, but that's F1, not sportscars. Could that help Audi as far as the "slow in, fast out" theory or road racing cornering techniques. And for Audi to still not have figured out the R15, they haven't been bad off compared to the 908 outside of Le Mans, but that's easy to do when the 908's near the very end of it's peformance envelope and at tracks where it's power advantage isn't as useful. |
||
|
9 Jul 2010, 10:10 (Ref:2723940) | #520 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
I don't you can draw any conclusion from the Acura. One of their problems was that the Michelin rear tyres were not adapted to be used on the front.
|
|
|
9 Jul 2010, 10:48 (Ref:2723963) | #521 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
The point still remains--does zero-keel work on an LMP car? It's a F1 derived idea like the J-damper, and we know how much that Peugeot even now to an extent struggles with it(wet or damp tracks).
Could the R15's front or rear grip be down to the Zero-keel concept? |
||
|
9 Jul 2010, 11:33 (Ref:2723981) | #522 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
The only difference that I can see is that the lower A-arm of the 908 is a bit longer. Last edited by gwyllion; 9 Jul 2010 at 11:57. |
||
|
9 Jul 2010, 11:53 (Ref:2723993) | #523 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
The R15 illustrates what zero-keel is by how the lower A-arms/wishbones are mounted to the tub compared to the 908's. The Acura ARX-02 has a similar layout: http://www.mulsannescorner.com/AcuraARX-02-1a.html
That link also has a link that's an explanation of zero-keel. I asked Mulsanne Mike about that, and he says that like on F1 cars, the advantages/disadvantages of zero-keel are both related to packaging. The big advantage is aero-the front and rear diffusers work more effiecently with the lower wishbones out of the way. The big negative is that if there's something amiss in the set up, it'll likely be made worse on a zero-keel since camber recovery is slightly inferior compared to a conventional keel set up. So is the zero-keel's advantages bunk, or is the R15 just set-up sensitive, since it seemed to have no difficulty at Paul Ricard or Spa of keeping up with, or even at times our running the 908s? Or has the R15 just been a better short track/ALMS type track car all along? |
||
|
9 Jul 2010, 12:56 (Ref:2724010) | #524 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
I found this figure describing the difference between single keel and zero keel in case of the Toyota F1 car of 2005:
The lower A-arm is mounted on the side of the nose and the suspension arms are under a steep angle upwards. That is not the case with the R15, which has its lower pickup points underneath the nose and its A-arm almost horizontal. So I would not call it "zero keel". |
|
|
9 Jul 2010, 13:48 (Ref:2724027) | #525 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Mulsanne Mike says it's zero keel, Acura/HPD said it was zero keel, so that's what I'm going by, as well as the fact that the R15's lower wishbones attach to the lower sides of the tub through what look to be flexures like on the Acura, and there is a noticable upward angle from the hub assembly to the tub pickup points, like on zero-keel F1 cars.
The only way for the R15's monocoque to have that extreme raised nose it has is with the zero keel. Also, the Toyota TF105 series isn't a very good example, since it still had a keel(the protorusion on the lower nose), it just wan't being used, while the R15, ARX-02, and most post-2006 F1 cars didn't even have a front keel. The reason for the R15 and the ARX-02 having the zero keel is to improve air flow from the front diffuser and down the sides of the cars-the R15 photo even shows a couple of small barge boards mounted under and behind the front brake ducts/shrouds. Also, at the rear, the zero keel improves rear diffuser air flow. However, as I said, it can come at a price as far as camber recovery and asscioated issues if set up improperly. Maybe the tech forum is where the zero keel question is best answered, but since it involves Audi vs Peugeot and the ILMC, I'm asking if zero keel is a bust for Audi? |
||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Le Mans Series 2010 | HORNDAWG | ACO Regulated Series | 1144 | 21 Sep 2010 14:08 |
2010 Le Mans Classic | john ruston | Historic Racing Today | 487 | 25 Aug 2010 19:35 |
[LM24 Race] Le Mans 2010 - Who's going? | Craig | 24 Heures du Mans | 416 | 10 Jun 2010 22:11 |
[LM24] Changes to facilities at Le Mans 2010 | GT6 | 24 Heures du Mans | 32 | 3 Dec 2009 20:28 |
LM Intercontinental Cup (thread closed) | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 32 | 1 Sep 2009 15:51 |