|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Jun 2005, 03:45 (Ref:1336731) | #26 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 418
|
.....and basically hand the World Championship on a platter to Ferarri.....
|
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 05:40 (Ref:1336773) | #27 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
|
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 06:48 (Ref:1336803) | #28 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Quote:
Anyway. I would say that there will be no exclusions. I just hope that the teams don't get points deducted: that would be totally incorrect, unjustified and counter-productive. The teams and Michelin will get fined some money, and quite possibly not THAT much in the end. I thik there is a good argument against fining the teams, personally, I don't see that they had a great deal of options come the race. Here's hoping the punishment starts and finishes with a fine. |
|||
|
22 Jun 2005, 07:13 (Ref:1336816) | #29 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
Last edited by alfasud; 22 Jun 2005 at 07:20. Reason: typos again... |
|||
|
22 Jun 2005, 07:46 (Ref:1336832) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Well, the one side-effect of having DQ'd all the other runners is that Bernie will be in serious doo-doo, having contracted to supply 18 cars to every race.
Unless Ferrari gets its museum emptied and Minardi get the 2 seaters scrutineered this ain't gonna happen. (Although in the "old" regs there were provisions to allow Formula 2 cars in if entries ever dropped below a certain number - this, I don't believe, ever happened under FOCA suzerainty. Interesting to see the GP2ers as Grand Prix drivers.) Or there'd be a mad scramble for BStones. Which would be a serious handicap to the other teams. Given the state of things, the FIA will I believe tread carefully - all **** and vinegar. Remember the "draconian" punishments for anyone found with TC software on their car? And exactly how were Benetton punished in 1994? |
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
22 Jun 2005, 07:50 (Ref:1336834) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Oh, ensign, I am not sure bringing up that final paragraph's particular field of debate was a wise move....
|
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 07:59 (Ref:1336843) | #32 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
|
I don't think this will happen...The teams have already docked themselves points by not racing so I'd say a money fine for them and the same from Michelin. The sport is already in trouble and I can't see the FIA droping 7 teams for another race is would make a laughing stock of the championship. I think the worst they'll do is a suspended
points loss or two race ban till the end of the the current season. |
|
|
22 Jun 2005, 08:30 (Ref:1336874) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
Autosport-Atlas report:
BAR are under a six-month suspended penalty for illegally running fuel as ballast at this year's San Marino Grand Prix, and that sanction will almost certainly be taken into account if the teams are all found guilty next week of not having acted in the best interests of the sport. If BAR is banned again for France, then there will be less than 20 cars racing, isn't there some sort of contractual agreement between Bernie and the promoters that he has to provide 20 cars for each Grand Prix? Will we see 3rd cars in France from some of the teams? |
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 08:35 (Ref:1336875) | #34 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
No we wouldn't see 3rd cars, that only comes into play if fewer than 20 cars are entered for the championship.
I honestly don't believe we'll see any teams banned from any races. |
|
|
22 Jun 2005, 08:41 (Ref:1336880) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
I think the teams won't accept an immediate ban of Michelin. But a ban of Michelin from 2006 could be accepted. In 2004 all Michelin teams asked the FIA to introduce a control tyre.
|
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 08:43 (Ref:1336882) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
When will the WMSC decide whether the Michelin teams should be penalised?
|
||
|
22 Jun 2005, 11:43 (Ref:1337037) | #37 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
After the damage caused by the US GP to the image of F1 i dont think the FIA will impose bans which would see more 6 car GP's or ruin the World championships...(if they have some sense atleast)...
I think heavy fines will be dished out! |
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
22 Jun 2005, 12:05 (Ref:1337055) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,578
|
I notice the article on GrandPrix.com states
".... that the information will be put in front of an independent technical expert to decide whether or not Michelin's F1 tyres are dangerous." I wonder who the FIA will call upon to be the independent technical expert in this case? Goodyear? Yokohama? Dunlop? Or possibly a tyre fitter from the local KwikFit? |
||
__________________
You win some, lose some, wreck some - Dale Earnhardt |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GB Rally under threat | P R Oban | Rallying & Rallycross | 10 | 12 Nov 2003 17:51 |
Spa GP is under the threat ! | Legend | Formula One | 20 | 31 Aug 2002 16:55 |
BAT threat to quit F1 | Super Tourer | Formula One | 25 | 2 Jul 2002 19:29 |
Ford's threat | marcus | Touring Car Racing | 4 | 26 May 2000 01:08 |