Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 Jun 2014, 05:37 (Ref:3419049)   #276
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,651
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I don't believe in coincidences! Then again maybe DJR rolling out the red carpet trying to make something happen.

If it does happen could Tim Cyndric come out to run it?

I know some people don't like the "pommy" invaders but lets face it both 888 and HRT are a class act. The Prodrive thing didn't really work out but Penske in the series facing up to the best of the current teams makes me salivate...

With the history Penkse bringing Shell back is absolutely not impossible and I can't see too many drivers turning that opportunity down given the opportunity.

From Dick's perspective, if he can get out with some compensation, a consultant/figurehead role with super strong and capable owners, and Shell on the side of the car, surely you couldn't wish for more than that?

Last edited by Mixer; 12 Jun 2014 at 05:51.
Mixer is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Jun 2014, 14:19 (Ref:3419235)   #277
one five five
Veteran
 
one five five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,297
one five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridone five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mixer View Post
If it does happen could Tim Cyndric come out to run it?
Cindric is far too high up the Penske chain (second in charge and will ultimatly take the whole thing over) to be sent faraway down here.

I'd expect a "Tim Edwards" type to run the team, while Cindric had a "David Richards" type of role.
one five five is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Jun 2014, 14:34 (Ref:3419246)   #278
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,651
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
I'd expect a "Tim Edwards" type to run the team, while Cindric had a "David Richards" type of role.
I would guess that any Penske fans would be hoping for a bit less bluster and a few more results... No doubting Mr Edwards pedigree but 8 years for any real measurable success with a Bathurst win and perhaps the best shot yet at the title this year is a long wait and a testament to his loyalty.
Mixer is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2014, 05:13 (Ref:3419734)   #279
eduardo1
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 1,200
eduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grideduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grideduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mixer View Post
I would guess that any Penske fans would be hoping for a bit less bluster and a few more results... No doubting Mr Edwards pedigree but 8 years for any real measurable success with a Bathurst win and perhaps the best shot yet at the title this year is a long wait and a testament to his loyalty.
Kind of hard to determine if they've been a success or failure.

They're inarguably the second-best team across the past five years but as far as winning the big two (Title or B1000) only picked up a single trophy.

Their direct equivalent is HRT, which they've comprehensively outperformed - but HRT has an extra Bathurst title to their name.

Their ability to shoot themselves in the foot is legend, but do they actually make more mistakes, or do FPR's get more prominence because they occur in more competitive positions than their non-T8 rivals?
eduardo1 is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2014, 12:44 (Ref:3419897)   #280
one five five
Veteran
 
one five five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,297
one five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridone five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mixer View Post
I would guess that any Penske fans would be hoping for a bit less bluster and a few more results... No doubting Mr Edwards pedigree but 8 years for any real measurable success with a Bathurst win and perhaps the best shot yet at the title this year is a long wait and a testament to his loyalty.
My use of 'Tim Edwards' was just using as an example the pre-2013 FPR setup, where it was owned from afar under David Richards (in this case Penske/Cindric) with a local running the day-to-day.
one five five is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jun 2014, 04:48 (Ref:3421451)   #281
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,651
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
My use of 'Tim Edwards' was just using as an example the pre-2013 FPR setup, where it was owned from afar under David Richards (in this case Penske/Cindric) with a local running the day-to-day.
He's exactly the kind of person Penske could and should attract. You couldn't ask for a better background or experience to run a v8 team.
Mixer is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2014, 04:50 (Ref:3422881)   #282
Sandgroper
Veteran
 
Sandgroper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Australia
Perth WA (south of the river)
Posts: 2,612
Sandgroper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
This guy could be in the mix "supposedly"

http://www.speedcafe.com/2014/06/17/...g-race-brands/

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Classic
Sandgroper is offline  
__________________
GO Hard or GO Home
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2014, 23:02 (Ref:3424739)   #283
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Ford's future?:

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/motorspo...620-zsgt4.html
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 01:06 (Ref:3424765)   #284
Airhead
Veteran
 
Airhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 3,366
Airhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAirhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Doesn't really shed any light though does it. Down to a measly six cars, who would have thought it...
Airhead is offline  
__________________
I am grateful that I am not as judgemental as all those censorious, self-righteous people around me.
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 02:45 (Ref:3424788)   #285
mikuni
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 717
mikuni should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmikuni should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The most interesting part of that article is that it implies they know what they are doing, but they say they can't release a statement until nearer the end of the season. If it was good news, I can't see why they wouldn't just say it now.

The only thing I can think of, bearing in mind that they are currently laying staff off, is that they want to get all the firing out of the way before they announce that they are going to continue with motor racing.

Or is it more simply that they don't know what model they will be running and are waiting for further word from headquarters on this?
mikuni is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 04:45 (Ref:3424804)   #286
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikuni View Post
The most interesting part of that article is that it implies they know what they are doing, but they say they can't release a statement until nearer the end of the season. If it was good news, I can't see why they wouldn't just say it now.

The only thing I can think of, bearing in mind that they are currently laying staff off, is that they want to get all the firing out of the way before they announce that they are going to continue with motor racing.

Or is it more simply that they don't know what model they will be running and are waiting for further word from headquarters on this?
It will be a waste of money running a car based on a Mondeo IMO.........looking at their proposed model line-up after 2016 it's Mustang or nothing.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 07:39 (Ref:3424833)   #287
GTRMagic
Race Official
1% Club
 
GTRMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Australia
Sell me this pen....
Posts: 46,865
GTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameGTRMagic will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airhead View Post
Doesn't really shed any light though does it. Down to a measly six cars, who would have thought it...
Only takes one to win.. Which is happening..
GTRMagic is offline  
__________________
Go woke, Go broke…
Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour..
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 08:39 (Ref:3424859)   #288
mikuni
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 717
mikuni should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmikuni should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesport View Post
It will be a waste of money running a car based on a Mondeo IMO.........looking at their proposed model line-up after 2016 it's Mustang or nothing.
A rule change would be required for this, and I imagine the other manufacturers won't bend over and comply unless there is something in it for them.

It does matter what Fords long term plan is. If the aim to bring in a larger sports sedan to replace the Falcon, then they may see fit to continue with that model. It's only body panels, so if the last Falcon is similar dimensionally it wouldn't matter a great deal rehomolgating in a further 2 years.
mikuni is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 08:58 (Ref:3424861)   #289
fomoco
Veteran
 
fomoco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Australia
Bris Vages southside
Posts: 2,193
fomoco should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridfomoco should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesport View Post
It will be a waste of money running a car based on a Mondeo IMO.........looking at their proposed model line-up after 2016 it's Mustang or nothing.
It will be interesting, to see which way they go, in the US of A, the Stang is for Gt racing , in Europe Ford are pushing the noddy box and Mondeo, for Australia, yes it would be nice to see the stang, and then Holden will bring in the Camaro, Chrysler could come back with the Challenger,
I think ford Aust will go with the Mondeo, as it aims at family, where as the stang suits "dinks", try and fit and get a couple of babies and the portable cot, etc etc , no an ideal car for that role .
fomoco is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 09:08 (Ref:3424865)   #290
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Better for the category to allow 2-doors cars than to risk losing a manufacturer.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 09:21 (Ref:3424872)   #291
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,651
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesport View Post
Better for the category to allow 2-doors cars than to risk losing a manufacturer.
I don't see Ford thinking this way... There is not enough money in Mustang sales for a racing program IMO and Ford will want to sell cars, not just spend millions for a halo marketing program.

If they continue I would think it will be something they think they can sell.

Unfortunately the Mondeo seems to exist between segments, I am not sure that it is the car.
Mixer is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 10:43 (Ref:3424895)   #292
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mixer View Post
I don't see Ford thinking this way... There is not enough money in Mustang sales for a racing program IMO and Ford will want to sell cars, not just spend millions for a halo marketing program.

If they continue I would think it will be something they think they can sell.

Unfortunately the Mondeo seems to exist between segments, I am not sure that it is the car.
I think they need a car with a performance image that will help them sell more Fords, and I don't see anything else in their range that can do that.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 11:36 (Ref:3424905)   #293
one five five
Veteran
 
one five five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,297
one five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridone five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesport View Post
I think they need a car with a performance image that will help them sell more Fords, and I don't see anything else in their range that can do that.
Performance model like a Volvo S60 or a Nissan Altima?

Volvo have shown that racing a vehicle based on a normal FWD family car does translate into sales. Ford are better racing their mass market car, not an upper range model.

As i've said before, Ford staying or leaving will not depend on whether they can run a Mustang or not.
one five five is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2014, 11:50 (Ref:3424907)   #294
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
Performance model like a Volvo S60 or a Nissan Altima?

Volvo have shown that racing a vehicle based on a normal FWD family car does translate into sales. Ford are better racing their mass market car, not an upper range model.

As i've said before, Ford staying or leaving will not depend on whether they can run a Mustang or not.
What worked for Volvo doesn't necessarily mean it will work for Ford or holden.........when the Ford company have been involved in racing in Aust they have always had a performance variant of the model they have been racing, eg Falcon GT, XR8 etc.........and I think that's what the Aust motoring public expect from them.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 00:18 (Ref:3425128)   #295
ForumNick
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Australia
Posts: 950
ForumNick should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
.....Volvo have shown that racing a vehicle based on a normal FWD family car does translate into sales....
A Polestar S60 (ie. the model the V8SC is actually based on) @ $120k+ could hardly be called a 'normal FWD family car'?
ForumNick is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 01:06 (Ref:3425146)   #296
peckstar
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Cayman Islands
Posts: 16,040
peckstar has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Childress wants V8 Supercars deal

Penske not the only NASCAR team in the hunt

Quote:
Childress and Richard Gilmore, COO at Earnhardt Childress Racing Engines, then confirmed they have been looking to buy a team or at least establish a technical partnership with an Australian V8 Supercar team.
peckstar is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 06:11 (Ref:3425213)   #297
one five five
Veteran
 
one five five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,297
one five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridone five five should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesport View Post
What worked for Volvo doesn't necessarily mean it will work for Ford or holden.........when the Ford company have been involved in racing in Aust they have always had a performance variant of the model they have been racing, eg Falcon GT, XR8 etc.........and I think that's what the Aust motoring public expect from them.
When Moffat & Geoghegan were racing Mustang's Ford were only interested in Falcon's.

When Johnson and Seton were racing Sierra's Ford were more interested in backing six-cylinder Group E production cars.

Ford have a history of putting their mass market car on the race track, not a niche vehicle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForumNick
A Polestar S60 (ie. the model the V8SC is actually based on) @ $120k+ could hardly be called a 'normal FWD family car'? .
Joe-Blow on the hill just see's a Volvo S60 running around, just like he see's a Holden Commodore or a Ford Falcon

Please explain how the V8SC vehicle is based on the Polestar S60 more than it is based on a normal Volvo S60??
one five five is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 06:20 (Ref:3425214)   #298
eduardo1
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 1,200
eduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grideduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grideduardo1 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by peckstar View Post
Childress wants V8 Supercars deal

Penske not the only NASCAR team in the hunt
Really interesting that the only direct quotes are around having access to some of the technology that is currently in V8 Supercars. If NASCAR are incorporating those into their series, it makes sense for RCR to get a link up with a V8 team to save them the cost of developing that themselves.

But there is nothing as far as quotes about them wanting to purchase a team. That is all speculation and supposition and what they suggested was flat out denied by Webb anyway.

I can't believe that if RCR were interested in joining V8s that Warburton wouldn't know about it. If there was genuine intent they would absolutely be talking to V8SA and getting the info they needed.
eduardo1 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 08:17 (Ref:3425253)   #299
Airhead
Veteran
 
Airhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location:
Coffs Harbour, Australia
Posts: 3,366
Airhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAirhead should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
When Moffat & Geoghegan were racing Mustang's Ford were only interested in Falcon's.

When Johnson and Seton were racing Sierra's Ford were more interested in backing six-cylinder Group E production cars.

Ford have a history of putting their mass market car on the race track, not a niche vehicle.



Joe-Blow on the hill just see's a Volvo S60 running around, just like he see's a Holden Commodore or a Ford Falcon

Please explain how the V8SC vehicle is based on the Polestar S60 more than it is based on a normal Volvo S60??
My thoughts exactly, Ford Australia have a habit of withdrawing from Motorsport and leaving the main competitors and their fans high and dry.
Airhead is offline  
__________________
I am grateful that I am not as judgemental as all those censorious, self-righteous people around me.
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2014, 09:29 (Ref:3425290)   #300
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,572
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
Ford have a history of putting their mass market car on the race track, not a niche vehicle.
And the mass market car always had a performance variant (Falcon GT, XR8 etc).........Mondeo (or whatever) won't have that........we don't want another Nissan Altima clone.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2014 GP3 season silly season Formulahistory National & International Single Seaters 53 15 May 2014 05:07
2011 British F3 off Season/Silly season news etc (merge) NaBUru38 National & International Single Seaters 335 6 Apr 2011 21:39
F3 Euroseries off season/silly season 2009 N.A-D.R National & International Single Seaters 225 25 Jun 2009 23:11
Silly Season QuickSilver Formula One 18 19 Jun 2005 20:46
Silly Season PBrock Australasian Touring Cars. 3 3 Dec 2000 20:42


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.