|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Jun 2016, 10:01 (Ref:3646524) | #4301 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
i think it's the other way around a bit, if i'm understanding your assertion correctly. i think audi wasn't the fastest through the speed trap, although they obviously had the highest real top speed, because the scoring line is too far down the straights for the current hybrids (especially for them this year at spa), so they were already decelerating there (just as in le mans the previous years, where most trap speeds are a whole lot lower than the real top speeds), not still accelerating and not have touched their top speed yet. they were braking extremely early before every corner this year, that's really the way they were always getting caught from behind. they were unefficient under braking, because they did it much too early compared to the toyotas behind them.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2016, 17:22 (Ref:3646611) | #4302 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
The Audi hit 329kmh fighting with the Toyota, who themselves hit 314kmh in the same instance but that's 20kmh and 2kmh off their reported top speeds respectively. So yeah, you're right. The scoring line is far down the straight. I think the Audi guys were braking much earlier but also coasting to meet the fuel-flow.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2016, 22:53 (Ref:3646703) | #4303 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,497
|
||
|
3 Jun 2016, 01:00 (Ref:3646710) | #4304 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
||
|
3 Jun 2016, 10:08 (Ref:3646789) | #4305 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
|
||
|
3 Jun 2016, 11:33 (Ref:3646808) | #4306 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 102
|
I wonder audi used the LM gear ratio at spa?.. since they reached 329 at 5th...
Its amazing but didnt help with lap time that much. |
|
|
3 Jun 2016, 16:22 (Ref:3646914) | #4307 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
i'm pretty sure they did. the same as last year. at spa though there's only one place or maybe two where they can do that so it doesn't help much with the lap time, but in le mans i think it might be a different situation. but the lap times were due to lack of grip, which is why they had to lift and coast extremely early, get caught from behind and lose a whole lot of time over the course of a full lap. hopefully they've solved that problem for le mans now, since we're not really talking details, but basic stuff, more or less. i don't think they afford to show up at le mans with the lack of grip and therefore pace that they had at spa.
|
|
|
3 Jun 2016, 17:03 (Ref:3646922) | #4308 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
coming back to toyota, maybe this is relevant for the tech-oriented members around here:
https://scontent.fotp3-1.fna.fbcdn.n...14&oe=57CD368B |
|
|
4 Jun 2016, 01:02 (Ref:3647023) | #4309 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 102
|
Ive heard that audi and porsche didnt bring michelin "hot plus" tyres (for 38 degrees or higher) in spa, which toyota used, because they did not expect such high track temperatures. I think toyota also didnt expect over 40 degree track temperatures but earlier decided to use hot plus maybe because they have confidence in managing to use these tyres in temperatures lower than 40.
Last edited by Hiro; 4 Jun 2016 at 01:07. |
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 08:19 (Ref:3647324) | #4310 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
Racecar engineering has an update on the Toyota's low drag kit. Sam Collins says they still have updates to bring before LM week.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 11:58 (Ref:3647362) | #4311 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Toyota, Are you satisfied with the status of the loser?
WEC - World Endurance Championship. Hybrid technology of Toyota was trained and improved by this race thoroughly. However, Toyota is having a hard time now. Last season was 3rd position following Porsche and Toyota. And in this season, Toyota was defeat in the first round, and in the 2nd round, it has mechanical trouble, and retired. Toyota which is an origin of a hybrid car can't be defeated by rivals any more. Toyota can't make hybrid car owners beyond 9,000,000 disappointed. Cross the wall! Grab the title! |
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 15:00 (Ref:3647408) | #4312 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
Not looking to good for Toyota right now!!!!
Porsche have a nice pace and Audi are very fast!!!! They (TOYOTA) should bring up some pace or else they will stay behind. |
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 15:28 (Ref:3647414) | #4313 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 12
|
I'm sure tire wear and reliability are toyotas focus. 1 lap pace isn't gonna win anything but pole.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 15:31 (Ref:3647418) | #4314 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 771
|
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 15:52 (Ref:3647426) | #4315 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,752
|
We will see i still think the race will be all about reliability
|
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 16:37 (Ref:3647436) | #4316 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 16:39 (Ref:3647439) | #4317 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 509
|
Toyota LMP1 Discussion
The racecar engineering article is good, seems this car is constantly being changed from an aerodynamic point of view (Trailing edge sanded and filled). This test shows nothing.. Quali will show if this car has potential, race will show us if long run pace is key.
Also new parts still to come between now and LM week. Holiday head is now on Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 18:32 (Ref:3647474) | #4318 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
Remember Spa when no one gave them a chance? The race is expected to be a lot warmer than today's test. With a new package, you don't go balls out trying to light up the timing sheets. But that morning session with Kobayashi going purple in sector two for 3 out of 5 laps in succession showed a lot of potential. Here's their press release for today.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 18:59 (Ref:3647479) | #4319 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Quote:
Test day has always been telling. In 2014 when Toyota had the best car, they finished 1-2 during the test day. Even though no one was going balls out. Last edited by Articus; 5 Jun 2016 at 19:08. |
||
|
5 Jun 2016, 19:26 (Ref:3647484) | #4320 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
It doesn't work that way when you look deeper into the timing. If you read the pr piece, they weren't doing any runs on low fuel or new tires. And the pace today is misleading in terms of weather anyway. Everyone will improve. I think that's obvious, but Toyota aren't in their finalized spec while the other two are. Sam Collins explained it on RLM.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 19:34 (Ref:3647485) | #4321 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,973
|
Yeah the times mean nothing. It isn't like everybody shaved off the same amount of time. You can't really judge it like that.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 19:47 (Ref:3647490) | #4322 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
I think it'll come down to who has the most room to improve. Audi and Porsche are with a race under their belts in these LM packages. So Toyota has some catching up to do there.
|
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 20:03 (Ref:3647499) | #4323 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Understandable that Toyota fans are being optimistic. I best the same things were said after last years test day when they were off the pace then too (albeit by a much larger amount) But the last 4-5 years are test day history tend to disagree.
I can't find any data in the last 4 editions of Le Mans where the test day didn't reveal the race week pecking order in the LMP1 class. Like i said, in that 2014 year when Toyota had the dominant race car, they topped the test day 1-2 and ran away with the race until they hit issues. It goes to show, that you've got that much extra pace when you top the test day doing race day runs. It's not like Toyota is sandbagging. How can they understand tire wear, fuel consumption, and improve setup, if the drivers aren't atleast running a mock race pace including the traffic. The test day is telling of the P1 pecking order. Last edited by Articus; 5 Jun 2016 at 20:08. |
|
|
5 Jun 2016, 21:25 (Ref:3647523) | #4324 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
Not just "Toyota fans" who are optimistic. They've improved by nearly 3 seconds from last year's test day. Porsche and Audi are nearly the same level. No one suggested they were sandbagging. But looking at the times, they are not far behind the others on lap by lap basis. Are you looking at absolute fast laps as a gauge of where these guys are? People did the same at Spa and then Toyota drove past both Audi and Porsche. We have all this positive information from times and interviews, plus the Toyota guys aren't even running the latest updates to the car.
Last year they were nowhere close. This year they're less than 2 seconds off. We know they'll improve, they all will. The question is will Toyota find more pace with more knowledge of the car and the final spec aero package. |
|
|
6 Jun 2016, 00:22 (Ref:3647558) | #4325 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
As RCE outlined, not even the aerowork for race week seems to be fully in place yet. The car is simply a big work-in-progress state right now, as was expected considering that they majorly pulled the development of the new package forward to have it ready for the season. People need to stop freaking out about practice times, after practice and qualy in Spa people were convinced that they would have an embarrassing performance. And what happened? They would have won the race in a dominant fashion if it hadn't been for the engine issues. Honestly, I'm more worried about reliability than their speed because if Spa was any indication, this race will likely not be won by the outright fastest car. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi LMP1 Discussion | gwyllion | ACO Regulated Series | 11685 | 16 Feb 2017 10:42 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
Strakka LMP1 discussion | Pontlieue | Sportscar & GT Racing | 56 | 12 Jul 2015 19:12 |
The never ending Toyota return to Le Mans (LMP1) Saga | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 6844 | 8 Jan 2014 02:19 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |