Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 Mar 2010, 03:27 (Ref:2654657)   #26
Belly13
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Australia
Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 1,075
Belly13 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by alfacors View Post

Perhaps running a 1hr *sprint* race for GT cars on the Friday afternoon, and then a 3 hour enduro for GT cars on the Saturday afternoon would be an alternative? Best of both worlds?
Now that's not a bad idea at all!!!
Belly13 is offline  
__________________
GRM's #1 Supporter 2014
Bloody Volvo Drivers...
Quote
Old 18 Mar 2010, 03:50 (Ref:2654661)   #27
davelise
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 338
davelise should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Even better idea.

12hr Production car race then 12hr GT race. make it a 24 weekend.
davelise is offline  
__________________
David Mackie
Quote
Old 18 Mar 2010, 06:07 (Ref:2654683)   #28
cptkablamo
Veteran
 
cptkablamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Australia
Posts: 1,203
cptkablamo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcptkablamo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would like to see this but only if the intregrity of the GT Championship remained (i.e. competitors did not enter this event instead of the Championship). I have had discussion with those involved with the Championship in the past and an event like this could cost the better part of the entire season's budget to outfit their cars and service them afterwards.

I would also like to see the Production aspect not be watered down too much.

But a return of GT cars to the Mountain for a longer race would certainly be a good thing...great idea from Dave there...what about midnight to midday...1am to 1pm...that would be a good weekend
cptkablamo is offline  
__________________
Careful. We don't want to learn from this - Bill Watterson
I'd hate to read what the people who hate the sport have to say...
Quote
Old 23 Mar 2010, 06:21 (Ref:2658383)   #29
nafe!
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 397
nafe! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So any news on wether or not this idea is gaining traction?.
nafe! is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Mar 2010, 20:38 (Ref:2658845)   #30
paydirt
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 169
paydirt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belly13 View Post
However, I think production car entrants will decrease just as quickly. I know for a fact that when this rumour was doing the rounds at the event last month, a lot of drivers said they wouldn't be back - including Garry Holt and Jim Hunter.
Arguably, Gary Holt probably wouldn't have been back anyway, considering the BMW must be close to its use-by date......with an incredible success- rate may I add....
paydirt is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Mar 2010, 22:07 (Ref:2658910)   #31
pplater
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 1,084
pplater should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridpplater should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by paydirt View Post
Arguably, Gary Holt probably wouldn't have been back anyway, considering the BMW must be close to its use-by date......with an incredible success- rate may I add....
I reckon the BMW should buy it from him to put in a a museum or something like that. What a car.
pplater is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 00:03 (Ref:2658957)   #32
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am not a fan. Point blank.

Have we not learned the lessons of Nations Cup, the Bathurst 24 hour and Carrera Cup ? We have all been here before.....and we all appear to have very short memories...

The beauty of the Bathurst 12 hour was it's affordability, the market relevance to the vehicles that competed and that it was a geninue endurance race with a variety of racing drivers from different experience levels and disciplines.

GT3 in Australia is only sustainable as long as there are rich punters to buy and drive the cars. As soon as the richies get the sh*ts becuase they are out-spending each other or get bored, the category implodes. What will happen when Simonsen rocks back with the Ferrari and blows everyone into the weeds again ?

Carrera Cup has gone this way... so did Nations Cup before that.... Indeed most of the GT3 field are just a home for all the Carrera cup leftovers...

European and Asian entrants ? Yes that is a possibility. But it was also a possibility at the 24 hour, and for the Super Touring 1000 and numerous other events that have been touted as "world class".

All that this "possibility" produced was a handfull of semi professional outfits that couldn't even match the semi professional australian teams. It turned out to be a dissapointing anti-climax.

The timing of the event is not-conductive to half of Europe trekking there toys around the world for an event that nobody outside Australia gives a rats about. Especially right on the door step of the kick off of their domestic seasons....

And you are right in saying that there would be a lot of production car competitors that would not return unless outright honours was at stake. Many of them wouldnt spend their money to play second fiddle to probably 10 hand-me-down GT3 cars piloted by rich muppets with rung in hot shots to put the thing on pole and put the rich players on a egotistical pedestial.

Let's look at the Mustang as an example. The Zuka's spent/spending a bomb in developing a car that could challenge for outright honours now and in the future. Now that very expensive toy is an also-ran overnight. Same for the TMR Evo's, and the variety of other production cars springing up around the countryside.

The 12 hour was a great race this year. It will get there on it's own merit with it's own rule book. More and more cars are being put into the pipeline with a view to run the race, and behind it the manchamps are slowly gelling into a worthwhile escapade....with the 6 hour and Eastern creek and the new format, it is looking attractive. And not a Supercar in sight....
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 00:34 (Ref:2658969)   #33
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,568
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood-duck View Post
I am not a fan. Point blank.

Have we not learned the lessons of Nations Cup, the Bathurst 24 hour and Carrera Cup ? We have all been here before.....and we all appear to have very short memories...

The beauty of the Bathurst 12 hour was it's affordability, the market relevance to the vehicles that competed and that it was a geninue endurance race with a variety of racing drivers from different experience levels and disciplines.

GT3 in Australia is only sustainable as long as there are rich punters to buy and drive the cars. As soon as the richies get the sh*ts becuase they are out-spending each other or get bored, the category implodes. What will happen when Simonsen rocks back with the Ferrari and blows everyone into the weeds again ?

Carrera Cup has gone this way... so did Nations Cup before that.... Indeed most of the GT3 field are just a home for all the Carrera cup leftovers...

European and Asian entrants ? Yes that is a possibility. But it was also a possibility at the 24 hour, and for the Super Touring 1000 and numerous other events that have been touted as "world class".

All that this "possibility" produced was a handfull of semi professional outfits that couldn't even match the semi professional australian teams. It turned out to be a dissapointing anti-climax.

The timing of the event is not-conductive to half of Europe trekking there toys around the world for an event that nobody outside Australia gives a rats about. Especially right on the door step of the kick off of their domestic seasons....

And you are right in saying that there would be a lot of production car competitors that would not return unless outright honours was at stake. Many of them wouldnt spend their money to play second fiddle to probably 10 hand-me-down GT3 cars piloted by rich muppets with rung in hot shots to put the thing on pole and put the rich players on a egotistical pedestial.

Let's look at the Mustang as an example. The Zuka's spent/spending a bomb in developing a car that could challenge for outright honours now and in the future. Now that very expensive toy is an also-ran overnight. Same for the TMR Evo's, and the variety of other production cars springing up around the countryside.

The 12 hour was a great race this year. It will get there on it's own merit with it's own rule book. More and more cars are being put into the pipeline with a view to run the race, and behind it the manchamps are slowly gelling into a worthwhile escapade....with the 6 hour and Eastern creek and the new format, it is looking attractive. And not a Supercar in sight....
Here, here! Well said Woody.......why risk ruining a great race.......GTs to race on their own on Saturday and then we may end up with two great races.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 00:39 (Ref:2658971)   #34
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood-duck View Post
I am not a fan. Point blank.

Have we not learned the lessons of Nations Cup, the Bathurst 24 hour and Carrera Cup ? We have all been here before.....and we all appear to have very short memories...

The beauty of the Bathurst 12 hour was it's affordability, the market relevance to the vehicles that competed and that it was a geninue endurance race with a variety of racing drivers from different experience levels and disciplines.

GT3 in Australia is only sustainable as long as there are rich punters to buy and drive the cars. As soon as the richies get the sh*ts becuase they are out-spending each other or get bored, the category implodes. What will happen when Simonsen rocks back with the Ferrari and blows everyone into the weeds again ?

Carrera Cup has gone this way... so did Nations Cup before that.... Indeed most of the GT3 field are just a home for all the Carrera cup leftovers...

European and Asian entrants ? Yes that is a possibility. But it was also a possibility at the 24 hour, and for the Super Touring 1000 and numerous other events that have been touted as "world class".

All that this "possibility" produced was a handfull of semi professional outfits that couldn't even match the semi professional australian teams. It turned out to be a dissapointing anti-climax.

The timing of the event is not-conductive to half of Europe trekking there toys around the world for an event that nobody outside Australia gives a rats about. Especially right on the door step of the kick off of their domestic seasons....

And you are right in saying that there would be a lot of production car competitors that would not return unless outright honours was at stake. Many of them wouldnt spend their money to play second fiddle to probably 10 hand-me-down GT3 cars piloted by rich muppets with rung in hot shots to put the thing on pole and put the rich players on a egotistical pedestial.

Let's look at the Mustang as an example. The Zuka's spent/spending a bomb in developing a car that could challenge for outright honours now and in the future. Now that very expensive toy is an also-ran overnight. Same for the TMR Evo's, and the variety of other production cars springing up around the countryside.

The 12 hour was a great race this year. It will get there on it's own merit with it's own rule book. More and more cars are being put into the pipeline with a view to run the race, and behind it the manchamps are slowly gelling into a worthwhile escapade....with the 6 hour and Eastern creek and the new format, it is looking attractive. And not a Supercar in sight....


I totally agree.
The 12 hr has been coming along nicely with its production car base. I don't see any benefit in allowing a handful of GT3 cars in at, what will most likely be, the expense of production cars.
I know of one team who were looking at upgrading from what they have run in the last few years to something faster. Now they will most likely have to get something faster so they are not getting lapped by cars 40sec a lap faster than them, or they will not turn up at all .

Yes the current race is all about outright victory with the classes also getting a good showing on TV. But I think the GT3 cars will take away a lot of the prestige of the front runners, and also the potential for manufacturer involvement in the race.


I think the better solution would be to give the GT3 cars a 4 hour race on Saturday . It could even be started at 5pm so it ended in darkness.
mtpanorama is offline  
__________________
I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder

I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 01:13 (Ref:2658978)   #35
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If the GT3 guys reckon they can 'make the event' why not throw on their own enduro at the festival of sporting cars ? after all, they are the ultimate sports cars ;-)

72 cars is outraegous. Even with 40-something this year track space particularly in qualifying was hard to come by if you listen to the front running drivers. BY all accounts, catching the Yaris at the end of conrod produced a huge speed difference... throw another 40-50k's plus onto a GT3 car and you have a serious safety concern.

I thought the track density at Mount Panorama was 55 ?
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 01:14 (Ref:2658979)   #36
Sheep Stations
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Australia
Australia
Posts: 728
Sheep Stations should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The contradictions, double standards and left wing attitudes expressed in the last few posts are breath-taking.

So, a few of the 'production' car lads are huffy at the thought of their EVO's, elderly BMW's and WRX's not being outright contenders for the B12hr? Someone tell me how they have any relevance or deserve reverence for being representative of the Australian car-buying public in any case?

It is a motorsport event, like a circus, rock concert or any other show. Bums on seats and participants make it successful. Any other focus is superfluous.

The Sepang 12hr is class based and includes GT2 cars. When I went in 2008, a 996 RSR from USA won it after the factory BMW Z4 died in the 11th hour. But the main focus and story was on the cars who came 4th and 5th outright. 2 Honda Civics...

There were 92 starters ranging from Porsche 997 RSR's to Protons. Why would we not want something like this?

Love the rich muppet and 'leftovers' references, adds so much 'class' to the discussion.
Sheep Stations is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 01:25 (Ref:2658982)   #37
Alan52
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Australia
Glenmore Park
Posts: 1,675
Alan52 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAlan52 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The more I've thought about the cars in Australian GT running 12 hours around Bathurst the more I think it would be a complete Porsche domination as the weight factor in the Lambo's etc take some other marques out and the chance of the existing teams running Moslers,Audis etc getting 12 hour reliability is nil.If people were complaining about Mitsubishi domination this year (and remember they were beaten) they would have much more to complain about with the front of the field being a Porsche Cup race for the last 10 hours of a Bathurst GT 12 Hour.
Alan52 is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 01:28 (Ref:2658983)   #38
rich07
Veteran
 
rich07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 8,611
rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!
The Nurburgring 24hrs has been running GT2/3 and production cars together at least for the last decade, I don't hear anyone complaining about that. You have Porsches and exotic metal up the front but there's always interest in the other production based classes too so why not here?

As long as there is good exposure and recogntion of class winners as well as outright then I can't see why we can't have a race like that at Bathurst.
rich07 is offline  
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly."
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 02:28 (Ref:2658993)   #39
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheep Stations View Post
The contradictions, double standards and left wing attitudes expressed in the last few posts are breath-taking.

So, a few of the 'production' car lads are huffy at the thought of their EVO's, elderly BMW's and WRX's not being outright contenders for the B12hr? Someone tell me how they have any relevance or deserve reverence for being representative of the Australian car-buying public in any case?

It is a motorsport event, like a circus, rock concert or any other show. Bums on seats and participants make it successful. Any other focus is superfluous.

The Sepang 12hr is class based and includes GT2 cars. When I went in 2008, a 996 RSR from USA won it after the factory BMW Z4 died in the 11th hour. But the main focus and story was on the cars who came 4th and 5th outright. 2 Honda Civics...

There were 92 starters ranging from Porsche 997 RSR's to Protons. Why would we not want something like this?

Love the rich muppet and 'leftovers' references, adds so much 'class' to the discussion.
Touch a nerve did we ?

Look - It has been PROVEN before, several times, that this sort of racing just does not appeal to the greater motor sporting community. GT3 had it's go - the 24hr. It didnt work. Porsche and sports car punters had the chance again, to show that they could be SUSTAINABLE. Nations cup. Sorry, didnt work either. Oh, and then someone thought Carrera cup would be a hit. emmmm.... sorry, didnt carry any real enthusiasm with the public either.

If this type of racing was so red hot, these catergories would still be around. They aren't. Ask youself why that is..

Why do people think that just because you have a handful of uber expensive GT3 cars that it a better show that will put "bums on seats"? When history tells us otherwise. Why destroy what has the makings of a great event for the masses to soothe the egos of the few ?

Production car racing, on the other hand, formed the backbone of the sport in this country. The 12 hour has been always for production cars, and the reference to 'elderly' cars and there relevance? Well, I hate to burst anyone's bubble -but... they are a damn sight more relevant than some downmarket Le Mans sports car that costs more that the median house price for the country... and can only be afforded by, i will rephrase my term so i dont touch any further nerves.. "Gentleman racers"...

Do you see the young people of this country hotting up and joining clubs about Moslers, or Lamborgini's ? I dont think so.

The 12 hour is in a growth phase, and as with 12 hour Mark 1, the growth has been good and steady. Not crazy and unsustainable. The factories will come.. it is only a matter of time.

Why should production car racers be appaulding the possible decision to become, what i can only describe, as glorified grid-fillers ? For an event that they supported and effectively put back 'on the map'. You have to be joking....

Do you think TMR - a semi factory operation - or Product, or Holden or the Zuka's would do doing handstands about running agianst the Moslers and Lambo's and Porsches for the glory of a production car class win when that win will be overshadowed by a outright win for a racing car ?

Of course not.

It makes no commercial sense. I reckon for every 1 GT3 car that is entered, you will have 1 or more production cars pull out....leaving you with less than when you started.

Returning now to the left wing of the house...

Last edited by Wood-duck; 24 Mar 2010 at 02:41.
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 03:09 (Ref:2659001)   #40
EGG
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Australia
perth, aus
Posts: 218
EGG has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Another porsche cup doesn't interest me, would rather leave it as production cars and see it grow.
EGG is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 03:27 (Ref:2659007)   #41
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,568
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Left wing? ......where did he pull that from?
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 03:53 (Ref:2659012)   #42
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
In my mind we are more to the right than left, but anyway....
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 04:12 (Ref:2659017)   #43
davo.
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 223
davo. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtpanorama View Post


I totally agree.
The 12 hr has been coming along nicely with its production car base. I don't see any benefit in allowing a handful of GT3 cars in at, what will most likely be, the expense of production cars.
I know of one team who were looking at upgrading from what they have run in the last few years to something faster. Now they will most likely have to get something faster so they are not getting lapped by cars 40sec a lap faster than them, or they will not turn up at all .

Yes the current race is all about outright victory with the classes also getting a good showing on TV. But I think the GT3 cars will take away a lot of the prestige of the front runners, and also the potential for manufacturer involvement in the race.


I think the better solution would be to give the GT3 cars a 4 hour race on Saturday . It could even be started at 5pm so it ended in darkness.
Mount Panorama are you able to give us a hint of what team you are referring to, and what car are they thinking of upgrading too?
davo. is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 05:59 (Ref:2659040)   #44
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I can give you a hint.....Bathurst.

Not sure what they are looking at yet, few things to consider. They would like to be in a class where there are other cars to compete against.
mtpanorama is offline  
__________________
I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder

I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 06:12 (Ref:2659042)   #45
davo.
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 223
davo. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtpanorama View Post
I can give you a hint.....Bathurst.

Not sure what they are looking at yet, few things to consider. They would like to be in a class where there are other cars to compete against.
Actually come to think about it, that team did state that they were considering stepping up a class before acquiring their current car.
I do understand that they would like competition, would be a shame to lose their current car though.
davo. is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 07:04 (Ref:2659052)   #46
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'd prefer to see it stay the way it is too, and run a separate GT3 12/24hr race. Adding GT3 cars would change the character of the event completely, no more "showroom showdown", within-reach feel to it. Seeing the competitiveness of the existing rwd cars this year, I'm even questioning the need to include a M3/C63/ISF/Cayman class.
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 07:05 (Ref:2659053)   #47
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If they would like a Turbo version of that WRX they have MtP, I can do them a great deal
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 08:10 (Ref:2659075)   #48
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,568
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnh875 View Post
I'd prefer to see it stay the way it is too, and run a separate GT3 12/24hr race. Adding GT3 cars would change the character of the event completely, no more "showroom showdown", within-reach feel to it. Seeing the competitiveness of the existing rwd cars this year, I'm even questioning the need to include a M3/C63/ISF/Cayman class.
I can't see the point in adding cars that then make the current cars less competitive or uncompetitive altogether (EVO's, HSV's, F6's, WRX's etc)........the invitational class is a handy tool for allowing entry of cars that may be over the price threshold but within the performance threshold.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 20:54 (Ref:2659423)   #49
nafe!
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 397
nafe! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnh875 View Post
I'd prefer to see it stay the way it is too, and run a separate GT3 12/24hr race. Adding GT3 cars would change the character of the event completely, no more "showroom showdown", within-reach feel to it. Seeing the competitiveness of the existing rwd cars this year, I'm even questioning the need to include a M3/C63/ISF/Cayman class.
The only reason the sportswagon and the bmw were competitive was due to the rain. The wagon made big inroads on the evo's due to its heavy footprint. In the dry it was getting thrashed.

The cars that you mentioned are much more in keeping with the events make up and at the same time will bring more character as well as a very small increase in speed (at least for the rear wheel drive class).

However it is unlikely to have an impact on spectator attendence like introducing the gt3's would.

Im still in two minds over this. A good field of gt3 drivers with profesional drivers in the mix would be a fantastic edition to the race, assuming your not a production car runner.

At the moment i think the best compromise is running a shorter gt enduro on the saturday of the event, say a 3-4 race. Long enough that it gives the field a chance to race like they would in a serious enduro, short enough that it keeps the fans entertained, can be shown on tv for its entire length and hopefully cheap enough that a big field will commit to it. Add to it a requirement that each championship class car has to field at least 1 profesional driver and i think you would have a winner.
nafe! is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Mar 2010, 23:35 (Ref:2659545)   #50
Wood-duck
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 398
Wood-duck should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
good idea nafe1... 3 or 4 hours in the twilight on the saturday afternoon/evening would be quite spectactular, although long days for the marshalls. Not too much of a strain on the expensive toys, there will be enough 'professional' drivers in the area and available anyway (due to 12 hr) and we get the glowing brake discs etc

I would also really like to see Group C/A historics added to the supports. Now that would be unreal...
Wood-duck is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porsche 997 GT3 for GT4 class FIRE Sportscar & GT Racing 17 9 Sep 2008 23:57
Who could join ALMS GT1 (not the state of the class thread) bil588 North American Racing 25 23 Mar 2007 23:11
[FIA GT] What is FIA GT3? Naruto Sportscar & GT Racing 17 8 Feb 2007 22:25
new GT3 class gttouring Sportscar & GT Racing 11 8 Oct 2005 15:55
[FIA GT] why did the FIA kill the GT1 class in FIA GT? CVT Sportscar & GT Racing 42 16 Nov 2003 01:48


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.