|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Dec 2015, 20:10 (Ref:3599517) | #5376 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
This is what happens when you put marketing people in charge of a project like this. I feel sorry for all the workers involved, and by that I mean all the backroom people who have worked their arses off, trying to turn this lemon into a real, functional race car. I doubt very much that they would have left the building with anything more than their bare entitlements, unlike some of the frontmen, who steered this Titanic like project from the beginning.
Unfortunately, as we all know, in motorsport, it isn't the first time this type of thing has happened and it won't be the last. |
||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
22 Dec 2015, 20:13 (Ref:3599519) | #5377 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 509
|
What will happen to the chassis, engines, workshops etc?
Doubt these will be in a Nissan museum haha! I feel sorry for the staff just before the holidays! |
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 20:20 (Ref:3599522) | #5378 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,555
|
The Nissan LMP 1 project that proves the rule the more hot air produced the bigger the failure on track.
I am wondering about how the Nissan / Renault situation is evolving. Renault was on the point of pulling out of F1 a couple of weeks ago. Could their decision have anything to do with Nissan pulling out of LMP1 as in which project got priority? I would love to see how a proper front engined LMP car would compare with what is a conventional layout as there are aspects to the Nissan that did work. For example it was very quick in a straight line but was this down to a lack of downforce or those tunnels running through the car? I thought the engine was built by Cosworth or is my memory fooling me. |
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 20:38 (Ref:3599525) | #5379 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,469
|
Quote:
"Members of the Indianapolis-based team were notified of the news Tuesday morning, and were forced to hand in their credentials and any property of Nissan immediately. Security access codes were changed and it was the end of the road." (from http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/d...boom-then-bust) That certainly sounds like the team members have lost their jobs - never a good thing no matter what your opinions are about certain race teams and their (non) performances... I doubt we'll see Nissan back in prototype racing any time soon - or ever for that matter! It took them almost 15 years to return for this project, this failure will leave a giant scar and the humiliation by Japanese standards is enormous - we might never see a Nissan prototype racing in anger again. |
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 20:54 (Ref:3599526) | #5380 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 389
|
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 20:56 (Ref:3599527) | #5381 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
Quote:
Sadly, most of the people who worked on the technical aspects of the car would know that this where coming, better than anyone else. Otherwise they were simply fooling themselves. I'm curious to what Radio Le Mans, especially Hindhaugh, has to say about this, considering his enthusiasm towards the project! |
||||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
22 Dec 2015, 21:22 (Ref:3599536) | #5382 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,469
|
Quote:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorspo...s-over-e-mail/ Every disaster has a 'silver lining' I guess and in this case it could be the strenghtening of US (prototype) racing in the near future with the immediate availability of a big group of very hard working engineers and mechanics. |
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 22:04 (Ref:3599544) | #5383 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Deltawing - Borrowed controversy technology ad campaign
ZEOD - Garbage failure GT-R P1 - The culmination on frustration The only good thing about this particular car - and which MAYBE brings it above the two G56 showups - was that it showed how immensely different design you can get out on the actual regulations. That was cool. I was kinda exccited at start, certainly around Super Bowl. Everything else was dealt wrong... horrendous and insulting PR obviously being the worst aspect on all The P2 (Zytek association) engine has been the only useful physical product they've had at LM this decade. And even that, as freezed costcap thing, is not so special... All people will remember on AMR ONE is how crap that chassis+enginewas. But they didn't BS people with it or make fuzz out on it. And that is why this will overtake AMR-One as the most failed LM project of the century, so far. Last edited by Deleted; 22 Dec 2015 at 22:10. |
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 22:06 (Ref:3599545) | #5384 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
This was an unfixable mess from start to finish. |
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 22:09 (Ref:3599546) | #5385 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 509
|
It did keep us all talking for over a year though! This thread has been one of the most busy on TT.
|
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 23:02 (Ref:3599559) | #5386 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Mhmhm... fan-engagement and new media by DC will endure forever... ...
https://mobile.twitter.com/pimpimma/...25128934088704 |
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 23:11 (Ref:3599560) | #5387 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,978
|
Quote:
Obviously this marketing approach needed to be matched by something more tangible on track - that it wasn't killed the project, but I do hope that the Nissan failure doesn't taint efforts to try and make LMP projects more marketing friendly and thus more commercially viable. |
|||
|
23 Dec 2015, 03:46 (Ref:3599585) | #5388 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
The delta wing,Zeod,and now the gt-r lm.what a joke,quite the messy joke Nismo has made of themselves and Nissan.
They would of been better off and should of built a gte gt-r. |
||
__________________
RACE CAR: noun: an automobile built or modified for racing. |
23 Dec 2015, 04:40 (Ref:3599587) | #5389 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,484
|
Autosport has a short on why Nissan withdrew.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 04:55 (Ref:3599588) | #5390 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,078
|
I wonder what happens to the car now? I hope it dosen't get destroyed to protect company secrets or some other BS.
Maybe somebody will buy it and race it in IMSA. They allow the DW there so why not. |
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 06:48 (Ref:3599598) | #5391 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,464
|
Maybe some collector will buy the cars (if Nissan is willing to sell them that is.) Despite being a failure, it's still the only modern FWD LMP1 car.
But yeah, I don't think they will be in any Nissan museum... |
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 07:23 (Ref:3599601) | #5392 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,484
|
According to the above Autosport story, there's no decision yet on whether they go ahead with the redesigned 2016 car at a later date. The turnover was too short to redo the car and make the 2016 season. I don't see how they will race again with the team being let go, unless it's done at a new location. There's only a sliver of hope for it to race again.
|
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 08:17 (Ref:3599604) | #5393 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,019
|
Quote:
I'm gutted to see Nissan pull out, because who doesn't want to see a 4 way battle for Le Mans? But the car was further off the pace than the Lavaggi LS01. I really hope they return in 17 or 18 with a better made car. Last edited by Akrapovic; 23 Dec 2015 at 08:38. |
||
|
23 Dec 2015, 09:13 (Ref:3599616) | #5394 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,546
|
A second thought came as an aftershock - it's really frustrating that marketing side of sports involvement was so great and has totally destroyed all the engineering efforts. Now, after some "different" attempts, lots of scepticism go to any fresh idea. Who really knows if that aero would someday work at 100%? For an engineer it was a fine piece of alternative thinking of some sort. It didn't need that much PR - just put those 15 mln not in advertising but into testing! And this underlines the question: what was really desirable by bosses - some media boom or sports achievements. It could have brought diversity, testing ground for some F1 components as it was in 70's - all that could help to complete the puzzle of modern high profile motorsport that is divided absolutely artificially, synthetically into different types of show. It could generate a kind of mutualism of some sort. But it didn't work out.
|
||
__________________
ACO-Ratel-Lotti group of "entertainpreneurs" soon will make you think that Reverse-Gear-Racing is the most professional series in the world. "Faccio il pane con la farina che ho". |
23 Dec 2015, 10:02 (Ref:3599627) | #5395 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 626
|
Im just waiting for Ford to cancel thier GTE program a head of time
|
||
__________________
-Peder Baeckman- 2017 695 Abarth XSR 180hp Brembo, Koni |
23 Dec 2015, 10:57 (Ref:3599636) | #5396 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 833
|
Apart from the Cosworth ICE, this effort has been a joke from beginning to end. It'll take some time for Nissan to recover from this embarrassment.
|
||
|
23 Dec 2015, 11:09 (Ref:3599638) | #5397 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
I'll never understand why people so consistently refuse to give the DeltaWing the credit it deserves. |
|||
|
23 Dec 2015, 11:22 (Ref:3599641) | #5398 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 11,019
|
Quote:
Anyone can build a revolutionary car outside the rules. What happens when they tried to adapt it to a car that plays by the same rules as everyone else? The LMP1 happened. Shame, because Nissan talked the talk and it was going to be a great return to a 4 way battle for overall victory. The loss of Nissan will hurt more with Porsche and Audi moving down to 2 cars each. |
||
|
23 Dec 2015, 11:49 (Ref:3599647) | #5399 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,250
|
I'm no designer, but to me the whole FWD idea seemed flawed from the start. Not surprised they have pulled out, I guess they were just delaying the inevitable.
|
||
|
23 Dec 2015, 11:56 (Ref:3599648) | #5400 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
Nissan you piece of crap. If thos company disappeared it woudld be for the better. Well this is some medicine for thos Nismo supporters. Car made by Ikea has a better chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Porsche Prototype Discussion | Simmi | North American Racing | 9266 | 13 Jun 2024 19:23 |
[WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
Audi LMP1 Discussion | gwyllion | ACO Regulated Series | 11685 | 16 Feb 2017 10:42 |
"We were pleased with Nissan Motorsport's performance in 2013,"- Nissan | GTRMagic | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 16 Dec 2013 09:20 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |