|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Sep 2009, 10:02 (Ref:2548510) | #51 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 189
|
potentially increases back pressure.
|
|
__________________
Race Magazine - for people who prefer to do it rather than watch it. |
27 Sep 2009, 16:57 (Ref:2549220) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
I think what your saying is more to do with Boyle's law. If you cool a gas it takes up less volume, so it would take up less volume and maybe reduce pressure. But it would be more dense. Everything I have read says velocity in the exhaust gasses (kinteic energy) is king - but I like to learn, so if anyone has any references about cooling exhasut gasses to improve engine power I would like to follow them up. On the subject of F1, I know two current engine manufacturers use ceramic coating of the exhausts to keep gas velocity up. I don't know about the other manufacturers. |
||
|
27 Sep 2009, 21:07 (Ref:2549379) | #53 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,479
|
You're right, Bernoulli would suggest suggest speed trades off as pressure, but that's only for pipe flow in isolation. As soon as you start having significant heat transfer across the wall of the pipe then that chap Boyle needs to be accounted for.
In either case would it not be correct to say that exhaust gas doesn't flow by magic, it needs to be driven by a pressure differential. That means there needs to be considerably higher than atmospheric pressure at the exhaust valves to drive a given mass of gasses from there to the end of the exhaust. Simple fluid mechanics. Where the gas momentum becomes important, though, is because of the intermittent nature of the driving force behind the gasses. This rewards high gas momentum because it effectively "extrudes" the gas behind the valve while it's closed, momentarily reducing the back pressure behind the valve. This can then be used to advantage, just as the valve opens, to "reduce" resistance to the combustion gas leaving the chamber. What I mean is, it doesn't actually "suck" the gas out of the chamber, it just doesn't "hinder" it..... I think..... ?? |
||
|
27 Sep 2009, 23:09 (Ref:2549436) | #54 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
|
||
|
28 Sep 2009, 08:32 (Ref:2549555) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 4,380
|
This may sound daft... But..
In terms of N/A cars and scavenging, would a fan located somewhere in the exhaust system offer any benefits? I.e. somewhere towards the end of the pipe where it's cooler perhaps - the idea being to suck the exhaust gasses out rather than rely on the pressure differential? |
||
__________________
This planet is mildly noted for its hoopy casinos. |
28 Sep 2009, 12:06 (Ref:2549670) | #56 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
It would have to be some fan; the pressure pulse leaving the cylinder is travelling at the speed of sound, which at 800 degrees C is about 650 metres per second! If the average exhaust temperature in the manifold is allowed to drop to 400 degrees, for example, over 20% of the kinetic energy is lost, so scavenging would suffer by the same amount. |
||
|
14 Jun 2010, 19:59 (Ref:2712179) | #57 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 568
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
So long and thanks for all the fish. |
15 Jun 2010, 16:04 (Ref:2712644) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 4,380
|
Nearly 8 months late with that reply, grichie
|
||
__________________
This planet is mildly noted for its hoopy casinos. |
25 Dec 2010, 19:32 (Ref:2808419) | #59 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
|
Just to add with heatwrap you dont know when the manifold has cracked- seems obvious but people forget
|
|
|
25 Dec 2010, 23:55 (Ref:2808474) | #60 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
Would it be possible? What potential problems would you face apart from the enormous heat?.. zero back pressure causing valve seating/sealing problems? |
||
|
4 Jan 2011, 16:59 (Ref:2811079) | #61 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
Quote:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5867984/fulltext.html Last edited by JamesH; 4 Jan 2011 at 17:05. Reason: Forgot link! |
|||
__________________
Locost #54 Boldly Leaping where no car has gone before. And then being T-boned. Damn. Survivor of the 2008 2CV 24h!! 2 engines, one accident, 76mph and rain. |
12 Jan 2011, 13:46 (Ref:2814691) | #62 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
Yes, making it work and work reliably would be difficult. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
roll cage lagging | AlexF | Racing Technology | 6 | 17 Nov 2003 14:31 |