|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Dec 2003, 13:35 (Ref:821246) | #51 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
i never knew richards has 3-400 million dollar to invest. i rather suspect honda or red bull taking over. although roebuck murmured in one of his columns( the printed one ) that honda is gonna stop end of 2004 orso. |
||
|
27 Dec 2003, 14:14 (Ref:821260) | #52 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
Red Bull doubt it there Jag bound
|
||
|
27 Dec 2003, 14:30 (Ref:821264) | #53 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
27 Dec 2003, 14:31 (Ref:821265) | #54 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
i somehow doubt that gonna happen with a british carbrand (eventhough its Ford nowadays). |
||
|
27 Dec 2003, 14:33 (Ref:821268) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
But sponsoring Jaguar and hoping that Ford lose interest and offload the team might be a shrewd strategy.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
27 Dec 2003, 14:42 (Ref:821269) | #56 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
spot on Bschneider plus everyone knows Jaguar F1 is Ford so the yanks shouldn't mind its more likely to happen then buying a Brit team with a Jap carbrand.
Lets face it Red Bull is already at Jag and for a few years to methinks (ala Mr Klien) |
||
|
27 Dec 2003, 15:11 (Ref:821279) | #57 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
The ford money is important but iirc Cosworth is not owned by Ford.Its a british company. Jaguar racing is 3 companies in one. I wonder if red bull is man enough to built an all new team and base it in the US of A |
||
|
27 Dec 2003, 15:49 (Ref:821297) | #58 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
Quote:
The only advantage I give Toyota is in finacese. They have everyone beaten there. What amazes me the most is that Toyota has been pretty poor for the first two years (actually three) but everyone seems to think they are making strides. Guess its me I dont like predictions so I will see how they match up on equal footing. |
|||
|
27 Dec 2003, 16:25 (Ref:821322) | #59 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
27 Dec 2003, 22:12 (Ref:821480) | #60 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
BAR got 8 points first year and 20 the 2nd.. toyota got 2 points and this year 17 but thats with the new pointscoring system. not a lot between them id say. |
||
|
28 Dec 2003, 00:35 (Ref:821545) | #61 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
28 Dec 2003, 00:58 (Ref:821563) | #62 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
you could say they have peaked in 00 and have slumped since
you Could say that |
||
|
28 Dec 2003, 01:08 (Ref:821571) | #63 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
You could, but that slump still beat Jaguar
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
28 Dec 2003, 01:14 (Ref:821573) | #64 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
true as they say 1 mans work is never done
|
||
|
28 Dec 2003, 01:22 (Ref:821578) | #65 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Well hope jag hire a second driver that can take it to him then
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
28 Dec 2003, 01:30 (Ref:821582) | #66 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
He He He you are always good for a laugh V
|
||
|
28 Dec 2003, 13:42 (Ref:821812) | #67 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
technical revieuw with the likes of mark hughes/alan jenkins and giorgio piola: " .. in its performance characteristics the toyota TF 103 was diametrically opposed to the renault.It had excellent engine power- close to BMW and perhaps on par with ferrari by the end of the year- but a chassis that disliked kerbs and abused its tyres. It was generally a quicker qualifier than BAR, but probably only because of its michelin tyres..." they go on about how honda missed the boat and created problems for the 2003 BAR design: "the BAR 005 was a sweet handling-handling, very compliant car with good downforce borne of its long wheelbase.technical director Geoff Willis was slightly reluctant to bring the wheelbase down because he was unconvinced about wether its honda engine would be on target with weight when the car was conceived( a short-wheelbase car with a heavy engine isnt good news for turn-in stability).His concern was well placed. THE HONDA V10'S WHERE TOO HEAVY, NOT POWERFULL ENOUGH AND UNRELIABLE!!!!." more bad news from the honda engine side: " The jordan ej13 had virtually zero development and lacked front-end grip, overall downforce and reliability, particularly with regard to its suspension. With its old-spec 72-degree cosworth engine( the jaguars was 90), its centre of gravity couldnt aproach that of cars with more recent engines.The change to this from the much heavier honda unit enabled the team to move the weight forward, but there was not enough cash in the kitty to optimise this with testing.." you did say the honda was heavy but MUCH heavyer than the old spec jaguar suprises me. |
||
|
28 Dec 2003, 19:42 (Ref:821941) | #68 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
Maby because of a Mr D.R. |
|||
__________________
Beep Beep!!! IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you... |
28 Dec 2003, 23:10 (Ref:822042) | #69 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Once you bear in mind that in 2000 Renault weren't involved, or Toyota, and jaguar were still learnign, I'd say BAR are on their way to peaking now. In 2003 they had much stronger opposition, as well as internal rivalry among the drivers and a tyre disadvantage, yet they still trounced 5 of the other 9 teams, including Toyota's massively-funded effort. I'd call that progress.
|
||
|
29 Dec 2003, 00:19 (Ref:822108) | #70 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
29 Dec 2003, 02:45 (Ref:822210) | #71 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Beep Beep!!! IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you... |
29 Dec 2003, 02:54 (Ref:822213) | #72 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
29 Dec 2003, 03:16 (Ref:822220) | #73 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Lets get back on topic people. This thread is about Honda and Toyota and there individual desire to become champions.
It has nothing to do with Ex-BAR drivers, Jaguar, Montoya, or Space travel. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
29 Dec 2003, 03:45 (Ref:822234) | #74 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,179
|
Honda have always built 'fat' engines. Anyone remember the Honda V12 that was heavier and had less power than the season before...
Luckily it was in a McLaren, and that Senna still wrung the neck of the thing to win... Although he did do that in a customer Ford too This is perhaps where the conservatism of the Japanese comes into play... always mindful of errors, and the usual happy dance of finger pointing that goes on when things arent working right, a heavy engine is a reliable engine... well sometimes depends whose car its in... Funny that the other 'Honda' program in the IRL doesnt seem to have these problems... oh, thats right.. its an Ilmor |
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! #CANCERSUCKS |
29 Dec 2003, 04:05 (Ref:822250) | #75 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,114
|
Toyota was in the right direction. Honda? I don't think so.
|
||
__________________
Montoya, what just happened? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Honda & Toyota | mabs_nsx | ChampCar World Series | 20 | 26 May 2005 23:36 |
Honda or Toyota | mabs_nsx | Formula One | 3 | 26 Dec 2003 11:56 |
Honda and Toyota to IRL why? | camcartfan | ChampCar World Series | 22 | 13 Sep 2002 19:55 |
Honda Vs Toyota | Mark F1 | Formula One | 25 | 4 Apr 2002 08:52 |