|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Sep 2014, 05:31 (Ref:3454201) | #8426 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
|
||
|
17 Sep 2014, 07:04 (Ref:3454220) | #8427 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,190
|
|||
__________________
Q: How to play religious roulette? A: Stand around in a circle and blaspheme and see who gets struck by lightning first |
17 Sep 2014, 07:28 (Ref:3454224) | #8428 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Yeah, but what about the fans, casual and sports-car fanatics alike? Looking at the Prototype class, the worst-case scenario would be summarized as single-make spec class just like the PC class.
|
|
|
17 Sep 2014, 09:52 (Ref:3454254) | #8429 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
Anyway, the two Lolas will be still fiddling around the back in any case so technically NASCAR can continue to claim P2 presence. |
||
|
17 Sep 2014, 11:33 (Ref:3454287) | #8430 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
||
|
17 Sep 2014, 11:37 (Ref:3454288) | #8431 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
I've always kinda felt that prototype racing was pretty much dead in the U.S. until 2017. What is going on now is just limping along for appearance sake until then. Honestly I think Jim France WANTS to get rid of the DP cars. It's doing nothing for the series. Does he tilt in favor of them due to the owners to paid big $$$ to get them upgraded? I'm sure he does (and the series) but that probably does not mean they WANT DP to continue. Even they see how all that turned out.
What they should of done is just killed all prototype racing in TUSCC until the new regs. The GT classes are strong enough to hold their own weight (just look at VIR). That would satisfy GM so that they could fight for overall wins for a couple of years. It would of also caused a build up of anticipation in regards to the "comeback" of prototypes in 2017. |
|
|
17 Sep 2014, 12:25 (Ref:3454301) | #8432 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,711
|
|||
__________________
It's great to be here! |
17 Sep 2014, 13:28 (Ref:3454317) | #8433 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,126
|
||
|
17 Sep 2014, 13:39 (Ref:3454321) | #8434 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,463
|
The late nineties era is repeating itself, sooner or later we'll gonna see some sort of new prototype series being set up, only a matter of time.
|
|
|
17 Sep 2014, 15:13 (Ref:3454352) | #8435 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
||
|
17 Sep 2014, 15:46 (Ref:3454363) | #8436 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
Quote:
Is it sad that when I wrote that... I totally forgot about the Mazdas. Yikes. |
|||
|
18 Sep 2014, 05:25 (Ref:3454569) | #8437 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
I see what you mean actually, but in this case the US isn't propping up Le Mans, as it was in the mid 90s, and there is no equivalent of the WSC machinery that was eligible for all the major races of the year.
|
||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
19 Sep 2014, 12:04 (Ref:3454981) | #8438 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Why after watching P1 for years DP underwhelms
Ok, here is a small rant. Plus it keeps the thread near the top of the forums
The lap time difference between the DP and P1 cars at COTA (top times) in FP1 according to my calculations is.... 9.17 seconds!!! If the series wants to know WHY fans are a bit miffed about what they were watching and what they get now...the above number should say it all. Yea yea, viability, cost, etc... It does not soften how much slower they are. |
|
|
19 Sep 2014, 12:37 (Ref:3454986) | #8439 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Then go watch WEC.
|
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 12:38 (Ref:3454987) | #8440 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,873
|
Was telling my wife this morning that number was only after a slew of upgrades to make the DP faster. Lipstick on a pig.
What's greatest to me is the gap for the ESM cars. I don't think the gap is even as big as it could be since we're using COTA as the test. Natural selection brought GT1 numbers to 2, natural selection brought P1 numbers to 2 (2013 ALMS, rumors not included) natural selection should have killed DP. (Warning: Blatant ALMS bias ahead) TUSC would have infinitely more credibility if they had let P2 and DP race in their 2013 specs. We'd see something that I think attracts sports car racing fans: faster cars, strategy, legitimate race finishes. It's pointless to think about, but it's a nice thought I use to daydream, find my happy place, etc. I don't care that only P2 cars win races, I do care when faster cars are handicapped to the point of extinction, and we're left with inferior products. |
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 12:43 (Ref:3454989) | #8441 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 12:56 (Ref:3454996) | #8442 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
Quote:
Maybe it's a better comparison to look up the best privateer P1 times.... |
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
19 Sep 2014, 12:59 (Ref:3454999) | #8443 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
|||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:02 (Ref:3455004) | #8444 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Actually, screw this. I'm out, this crap isn't even fun to debate any more.
I'd just like to say thanks to those few that really stunk up this place with their constant negativity and holier than thou attitudes. |
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:06 (Ref:3455007) | #8445 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
What kind of argument is that? If you don't like product X you're not allowed to complain, so please and switch to product Y which is entirely different?
Not likely but NAEC would be different. Anyway, the lap times differences last year were even bigger than now. I think come quali we'll see huge improvements from Thursday everywhere |
|
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:07 (Ref:3455009) | #8446 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:24 (Ref:3455021) | #8447 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,463
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:28 (Ref:3455023) | #8448 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:29 (Ref:3455024) | #8449 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
http://postimg.org/image/k7wlreyw9/full/ |
||
|
19 Sep 2014, 13:31 (Ref:3455025) | #8450 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
The freaking HUGE bill they forced on the DP field really hurt..bad. All in the name of making sure DP's could fight for overall wins...and also because they had to keep them significantly in front of GTLM. In retrospect it WOULD of been a MUCH better thing to have the DP's fight it out with LMPC or even be their own class but politically that was not going to happen given the whole reason why GM made a DP corvette was so they could fight for overall wins. It's rather funny really. GM And Ford want a manufacturer supported prototype class but are unwilling to play in LMP1, so they are keen on changing the lower prototype classes to accommodate them (DP and now P2 probably based on what team corvette said recently). Really, they need to suck it up and step up to LMP1. GM can make a branded looking Corvette prototype in P1, Ford can do a TRUE ecoboost car in P1 if they want. And with those two committed to P1 you could have a P1 class in Tudor in addition to opportunities for WEC races. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Series to face axe | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 8 | 6 Aug 2001 11:54 |
Will the BTCC get the axe? | Sodemo2 | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Mar 2001 13:58 |