|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Nov 2005, 23:24 (Ref:1461800) | #76 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,843
|
Quote:
Target date : 4 Dec Target Drivers for one of the Gough offspring : inc Peter Dempsey, Justin Dawkins and Johnny Hutch. |
|||
|
15 Nov 2005, 23:26 (Ref:1461803) | #77 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Nov 2005, 23:29 (Ref:1461809) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,843
|
So the engine was only a loan then?
Tank tape and a big hammer etc. etc. |
||
|
15 Nov 2005, 23:50 (Ref:1461828) | #79 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
16 Nov 2005, 08:36 (Ref:1462050) | #80 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,229
|
Ian would love to do the Anglesey event - I think with the three races he might be able to bin his Novice cross on the back.
Just going to take a bit of time getting a new honeycombe nosebox, nosecone and shocker panel and assemble a new engine. As a matter of interest, Stu hit a prehistoric at unabated speed at the WHT. He had no time to even brake and reckons the car was doing about 50mph slower than him. He didn't even have a rain light for goodness sake! The nosebox on the Swift took the impact, then ran over the roll hoop of the other car. For all you other Swift drivers out there, never ever compromise on a cheap single skin nosebox. Apart from your feet, a similair impact would for sure have taken out master cylinders and rack and probably chassis. And you would not have been out in the final within 25 minutes of getting back to the garage either. Another thing, you don't need to bother tracking your car up either - Stu had about 10mm of toe out on one side and came from 21st to 6th. His steering wheel was offset by about 20 degrees. He came back and told me it was handling the best ever! |
|
|
16 Nov 2005, 08:56 (Ref:1462063) | #81 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Quote:
And you worked on the car for about 60 hours over the weekend too, so you've got no excuse! |
|||
|
16 Nov 2005, 10:38 (Ref:1462139) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
Mmm, you are right john, we did spend about 60 hours on the car, chasing all sorts of weird faults. If Dave Hart and Westec were baffled what chance has a mere Kartingdad got!! I suppose its not my prep skills that were outstanding but rather the nut behind the wheel. To launch yourself over a slower cars roll hoop flat out and then jump back in the ( bodged) car 25 mins later and still go flat out in zero visibility suggests that someone has got a severe lack of imagination. And I thought I was daft doing over 120mph in thick fog when I used to rally.... |
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 11:57 (Ref:1463108) | #83 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
I'm not as old as most of you, but the nicest FF1600 car I ever saw was a Reynard 81, Not sure what letters came before or after. but it was very nice looking
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 14:28 (Ref:1463216) | #84 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
[img=http://img348.imageshack.us/img348/2995/973220041106wildfireimag2tn.jpg] |
|||
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting" |
17 Nov 2005, 14:29 (Ref:1463219) | #85 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
I think that's a rather newer model?
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 14:57 (Ref:1463227) | #86 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting" |
17 Nov 2005, 15:00 (Ref:1463232) | #87 | |||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
No it's not that one. It's the one with the 'table' on the back behind the engine. I'm told that at the time some of the scrutineers objected to this pece of bodywork and it had to be removed. I've also been told it was the 81F. If that helps |
|||
|
17 Nov 2005, 15:02 (Ref:1463235) | #88 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,132
|
See my next post below. I need to wear my glasses more !!!!.
|
||
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting" |
17 Nov 2005, 15:30 (Ref:1463249) | #89 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
No the one I saw didn't have an air intake for the engine
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 15:41 (Ref:1463257) | #90 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
It's totally different, the 87-92FF was a newer generatiopn altogether...
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 18:32 (Ref:1463363) | #91 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
Definaitely an 81F or FF, It was a photo and it was dark blue
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 20:47 (Ref:1463475) | #92 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
The 89 reynard is obviously a lovely looking car, beautiful nose, but an horrible big wide roll hoop - spoils it, although probably very strong. Judging by recent performances they are still quite quick, which when it comes down to it is what they are designed for. Going back to an earlier part of the thread I was given the job of doing the initial artist impressions of the Royale RP26 back in the 70's, by the agency I was working for at the time. Pat Symonds (now with Renault) gave me photos of an Eagle Indy car which had been racing in the States around the same time. That's where the RP26 got it's squared front cockpit section from. It was supposed to be good aero wise. I did various sketches, which I think although it was along time ago were pretty close to the final product.
PS. Do ten-tenths have a spell check because my spillings crop! |
||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
17 Nov 2005, 21:06 (Ref:1463483) | #93 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 231
|
Ginetta do you have a photo of the 81 Reynard never seen one.
|
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 21:23 (Ref:1463502) | #94 | |||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Nov 2005, 21:46 (Ref:1463523) | #95 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
I've found an '82 Reynard, Which is similar, but not exactly the same
http://www.varac.ca/Festival/Images/LoweReynardFF.jpg |
||
|
17 Nov 2005, 22:14 (Ref:1463547) | #96 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Looks like a American version of the 82 Reynard - More aerodynamics.
|
||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
17 Nov 2005, 22:37 (Ref:1463568) | #97 | |||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Nov 2005, 22:53 (Ref:1463588) | #98 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,843
|
Quote:
One was driven by James Weaver and the other by North Eastern driver, Wally Warwick. This wasn't until Oct 1982 though, so your dad's photo of Wally at his home circuit of Croft in July 1981 must have been in another car, probably a Van Diemen RF79 or RF80, both of which had a basically flat rear body section. I'm probably totally wrong, but hope this helps. |
|||
|
18 Nov 2005, 00:33 (Ref:1463659) | #99 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
18 Nov 2005, 10:09 (Ref:1463933) | #100 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 108
|
Couldn't have been 82. Croft close in October 81. I know it's a Reynard Because there was a photo of the reynard badge.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What do you think is the best ever FF1600? | JR Ewing | Club Level Single Seaters | 81 | 13 May 2012 07:26 |
Which FF1600 | Midgebradley | Club Level Single Seaters | 33 | 29 Jun 2005 17:11 |
FF1600 at Spa | blue nose | Club Level Single Seaters | 14 | 21 Feb 2004 07:40 |