|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
3 Dec 2006, 09:58 (Ref:1780824) | #76 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
3 Dec 2006, 14:23 (Ref:1780953) | #77 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
IMSA ( ALMS ) Spectator and Media info
http://www.americanlemans.com/news/Article.aspx?ID=2721 TV Viewership Quote:
Grand Am ( Rolex ) Spectator and Media info http://www.grandamerican.com/News/Article.asp?ID=7420 TV and Spectators: Quote:
Quote:
When attempting to read between the lines to get simular and comparible data, which is not easy. IMHO ALMS specataors, and TV Veiwship is much higher then Grand AM. Income and spending habbits of ALMS fans was pubilshed a few months ago. I will get that info. Still looking for Grand AM income and spending habbits of their specators. |
|||||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
3 Dec 2006, 15:39 (Ref:1780975) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
I got all the reports from ALMS last year but have not done so yet for this season AU N EGL, I will do that this week but they were very impressive last year, I suppose they would be if we can get hold of them, unlikely to to publish if poor. SRO do not have any such information that I know of and certainly not the LMS series but then what we are saying in this thread is that the two latter organisations simply don't care about spectators anyway and so will not bother getting the same data as ALMS.
I the fact that Greenlight did the FIA TV this year gave us a much better programme with a reasonable time split between GT1 and 2 and some good technical comments, I did wonder with them doing both series if the quality of ALMS would suffer but it did OK I think. Any sign that Hindhaugh is reading our views yet?? He did the highlights programme on Motors with Greenlight |
||
|
3 Dec 2006, 16:50 (Ref:1781003) | #79 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
3 Dec 2006, 16:56 (Ref:1781006) | #80 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
On the LMS site there is a breakdwon of media coverage in 2006. http://www.lmes.net/lemansseries2006...ss_release.pdf http://www.lmes.net/lemansseries2006...ffusion_tv.pdf E-mail:- media@lemans-series.com Last edited by JAG; 3 Dec 2006 at 17:04. |
||
|
3 Dec 2006, 17:15 (Ref:1781022) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
OK, we seem to be agreed that something needs to be done to contact the ACO and their elected promoter and we need to see what "Hindy" has done to extend Radio Le Mans to become "Radio Le Mans Series" and make it available from the website.
As Hammerdown says the Live Video on the LMS website is OK as far as it goes (not very far really!) but a bit uncertain in the connection. I tend to get the live timing that is on offer and switch between to the two so seeing live timing and listening to a proper radio commenatary that we should be able to do would be good. The only redeeming feature about Donington was the live TV and I finished up in a hospitality suite watching that. DSC carried the story a lttle while back that the LMS TV and the 24 hours TV were to be part of a TV package, can that nice Mr Goodwin or MC tell us who to contact in this respect so that we can pass the contents of this thread on to "the powers that be". If my post #68 summs it up send them that and point out how many hits we have had in a short time. What next folks? What about SRO? |
||
|
3 Dec 2006, 21:25 (Ref:1781162) | #82 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
NASCARs TV ratings dropped 10% in 2006. several of the races were below the 5/12 share in major markets. However, NASCAR is still the most popular TV sport event in the US.
Quote:
The Future of NASCAR http://www.nascar.com/2006/news/head...car/index.html Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by AU N EGL; 3 Dec 2006 at 21:35. |
|||||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
3 Dec 2006, 21:27 (Ref:1781166) | #83 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
NASCARs $$ distrabution for 2006
http://www.nascar.com/2006/news/head...day/index.html Top Eleven Driver Winnings Awards Point Fund Total J. Johnson $8,909,143 $75,000 $6,785,982 $15,770,125 M. Kenseth $6,608,919 $75,000 $2,841,047 $9,524,966 D. Hamlin $4,389,222 $50,000 $2,168,710 $6,607,932 K. Harvick $6,201,578 $100,000 $1,929,828 $8,231,406 Earnhardt 5,466,104 $1,645,635 -- $7,111,739 J. Gordon $5,975,873 $1,495,574 -- $7,471,447 J. Burton $5,008,882 $1,356,113 -- $6,364,995 K. Kahne $6,204,222 $201,000 $1,316,156 $7,721,378 M. Martin $4,282,548 $1,286,200 -- $5,568,748 K. Busch $4,821,093 $1,256,244 -- $5,537,337 T. Stewart $7,285,281 $310,000 $1,143,888 $8,739,169 |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
4 Dec 2006, 10:27 (Ref:1781514) | #84 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 142
|
Hello - all
First - thanks to Richard Sudgden for bringing this great thread to my attention. I have just read right through it - very constructive and well considered... So apologies for not being in sooner - I've was in Wales all last week for the WRGB. Which is a perfect illustration of what is being discussed here - so rest assured it's not just sportscars that has there problems. For the Rally we set up studios in Rally HQ Millennium stadium and at the Swansea Service Park, had reporters at every styage start or finish and broadcast to the whole of the Rally route with FM transmitters at Cardiff, Swansea and on the stages themselves. In addition the coverage was made available - free by the way - via Sky Ch 0157 and the Internet. Our news team produced Local and International news bulletins every hour and a rally desk every 20 minutes. In addition we had a Welsh Language update every hour plus Welsh and English highlights packages every day. Our team - incuding technical support was 15 people - all of whom had to be fed, watered and hotelled at the event. As you can imagine for spectators keeping up with 111 starters, 3 Major classes plus the final round of the British Championship (another 6 or so classes) running together over three days - would be impossible without a Radio Station, particularly as there is ZERO coverage on BBC national sports radio... However it may shock you to know that we still have to raise the budget on our own.... NONE of the manufactures, their sponsors or the BRC teams pitched in. Contrast that with when we put in the service for Crufts at the NEC (no laughing!) - similar numbers of people, 5 days of programming ... The Kennel Club underwrite the whole project and we have a revenue share on the advertising income the station attracts... Don't ask me why but outside of motorsport we never have any problems in getting organisers to understand the value of using Radio to inform those at the event and extent the reach of the event beyond the venue. Tennis, Equestrian, Golf you name it we have done it - and done it as a service to the Organisers who have invested funds... As a number of poeple have noted I have tried several times to get the LMS to sanction and support a worldwide English - langauge radio service from their events. Although they accept the validity of the concept they will not commit funds. To be honest I am simply not in the position to have another project (like Radio Le Mans where we pay for the rights and the operationg costs) where I am responsible for all the financing. Unfortunately the LMS (and FIA GT) does not occupy a strong enough position in commercial terms to give me a realsitic chnce of raising even enough money for us to send a reporter to the events let alone a commentator, pit reporter and tech support in order to do the sort of job we do at ALMS. Ask the teams if either of these series are a real business model for attracting sponors - they will tell you the same... No profile! With Audi and Peugeot coming into the series that may change, but I do believe that it's unfair to them, and to private investors like Johnathon France, for Series Organisers to abdecate responsibilty for promotion and marketing of the series to them. Sadly the voice of the spectator is tiny in this context - remember that we have had the farce of an FIA GT event held at Paul Ricard, where there is NO general admission for specators at all! The bulk of series exists (and profit) on the entry fees of the teams, and there is no shortage of them for LMS and FIA GT, spectators are unecessary to their business model and in some cases will actually add costs - especially if they aren't on a cut of the gate take. OK I need to get off the hobby horse now - but I will make an couple of points in closing; 1- I'm happy to talk to anyone, no really anyone, who has the real will to support high quality Radio Broadcasts from any event or series - it's not expensive and good radio is a fraction of the cost of bad TV. Thanks to Satellite Radio broadcasts and the Internet audience figures for our shows are comparable or better than the Live TV numbers on Bravo 2 or Motors TV. As we showed at Petit Le Mans this year - you can combine TV and Radio commentary without having to compromise (too much) on production standards or editorial integrity for either medium. 2 - ALMS underwrite 100% of the service for their events - remember to say thanks for that - let them and their sponsors know your support the ALMS Radio, however you listen. 3 - It's not me that's voicing the FIA GT highlights for Greenlight - that's Richard Nichol (who does the live shows with Graham Tyler) 4 - Anyone who want's to get in touch info@radiolemans.com Regards John H |
|
|
4 Dec 2006, 10:39 (Ref:1781525) | #85 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,102
|
I'm kind of on the fence with this thread (and I'm being LMS specific with this post).
I have the same desire to see the necessary information made available at the circuits in order to easily follow the races trackside as those who have expressed such an opinion on this thread. But, as a 'diehard' fan, I have enough interest in the race to keep abreast of what's going on just by watching and listening to the circuit race radio broadcast, without any further enhancements to what we have now. I agree with Martyn, ticket prices are set at a level which equate to the facilities currently offered at the circuits. The only way I can see 'Information Posts' with leaderboards and timing screens being made available is if the ACO or the circuit promoters themselves seek sponsorship for such technology to be made available trackside. I don't particularly want to see ticket prices rise. Add the associated costs of travel and refreshments to that of the ticket and the 'real' cost rises significantly. I honestly believe that we are arguing the case for those who have little knowledge (or even interest) of endurance racing. People who are unlikely to read or participate on forums such as this, and who are more likely to find themselves at a race thanks to corporate hospitality, an association with someone involved in the event, or who just happen to live locally and decide to give it a go. A ticket price hike would probably put the majority of locals off however. Neither the ACO nor the circuit promoters are prepared to take the financial risk involved in enhancing facilities trackside. So any improvements to the current situation must surely be made through sponsors (if they can be found!). |
|
|
4 Dec 2006, 12:48 (Ref:1781629) | #86 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
Thank you for your strong input. I quoted four of your paragraphs above which I think Highlight the difficult issues. 1. There is not the spectator profile for team sponsors. Sponsors need to see spectators buy their products first before the sponsor will commit additional funds. 2. Audi and Puegots participation MAY help spectators numbers. 3. Gate entering spectators are a very very small almost if not insignificant concern. I wonder if spectators here on the forum should get or put together some form of letter that each of us could send to team sponsors and mention how much we enjoy watching their team. The more individuals spectators ( Punters - I like that term) cans send to Teams sponsors the more Team sponsors may recognise the spectators value. 4. Very few race tracks split gate reciets. The gate recipts are part of what the circuit makes in additoinal income. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
4 Dec 2006, 16:27 (Ref:1781753) | #87 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Surely LeMans and ALMS prove that the spectator profile exists - it is a question of galvanising them
You just need to look at the marketing information that shows the profile of ALMS fans and realise that European fans have a similar potential - good spending power and a dream market for many sponsors. I for one have been influenced in my choice of car by Sportscar racing - my last two main cars - both are from Manufacturers who compete in sportscar racing Unfortuantely and largely because of poor facilities the UK motorsport fans that attend races appear to be die hard race fans. Given a proper 'event' then the crowds would appear - look at Goodwood they have created two of the biggest sporting events in the country from nothing in a few years - it just takes a little imagination and wise investment. There is no reason why, with the right investment and person at the helm LMS races could turn into a mini Le Mans in each of the countries taking part |
||
|
4 Dec 2006, 16:53 (Ref:1781773) | #88 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
There was something else I saw but need to find AGAIN, was that when ALMS was at Road Atlanta ( Atlanta GA ) a very large Europeain spectator contigant came to the event. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
4 Dec 2006, 17:45 (Ref:1781810) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
So, at last someone got Hindy to comment and we can see the real problem is just as we thought early on in this thread, the organisers get their money from the entrants and so can ignore the spectators. I really don't believe the teams can put that out, they would never get any sponsorship and whilst corporate days are good for those invited they must surely want some punters through the gate, anybody know what the reaction to Paul Ricard was from the teams?
The fact remains that more people means more interest all round and what is happenimg at the moment is that the hundreds of thousands of fans that actually go to LM 24 are not being tempted back to what Mal describes as a mini Le Mans on their doorstep, this is a shame, indeed it is shamefull that the ACO are OK and don't really care about the series that bears their name, a real "I'm all right Jack attitude" Of Course Mr Bentley we are arguing the case for those who have little knowledge, new blood is required in spectator enclosures so that those of us who are already enthused by the sport can continue to have something to watch and be involved in. I have been around this game since the fifties and seen many changes but the rises and falls of sportscar racing are one of the strange stories. Most sports car or hot hatch owners are interested but it is not easy to keep track from the enclosures and I doubt even you know who is leading every class at all times and who is catching, or falling down the order unless the radio tells you and they have the timing screen. All we want is some more information for the spectator to raise their interest and attract new teams to make the racing better but it seems from what Hindy says we will not get it unless the entrants pay for it. |
||
|
4 Dec 2006, 17:54 (Ref:1781823) | #90 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Quote:
Surely it needs the teams to stand up and say 'hang on we want spectators too' The trouble is none of them want to rock the boat as it may threaten the all important Le Mans entry. |
|||
|
4 Dec 2006, 18:10 (Ref:1781834) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
I would not be supprised that the Majority of Primary Sponosors we see on the sides of cars are indeed OWNED by the Team Prinicple.
The Business Owner becomes the Sponsor of His Own team, ( racing is his hobby ) and can use that sponsorship as a Tax deduction for advertising of his business. Many of the ALMS and Grand Am sponsors are indead Owned by the team principle. |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
4 Dec 2006, 19:56 (Ref:1781936) | #92 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
In LMP1, only Dyson Racing (Thetford and Norcold are amongst some dozen or so companies in the Dyson's holdings.) Autocon may included Chris McMurry's company as a minor sponsor. In LMP2 only Van der Steur Racing has such a sponsorship. It has be at least two years since Intersport had sponsorship (Banana Joes) from the team principals. None of the Acura teams have any visible sponsorship from a holding of the team principal(s), nor does Mazda. In GT1, the last team with sponsorship on the car related to the principal was Tom Weikardt's Carsport America. In GT2 Petersen Motorsports-White Lightning Racing is prominently sponsored by Petersen companies. Risi's team name is that of the principal, but the actual sponsors appearing (Forza2, for instance) are not Guisseppi's dealership or any other Risi holding. Flying Lizard Motorsport has some funding that is derived from the interests of principals, but it is certainly not visible "on the sides of the cars." So that's three, four if you count the minor sponsorship of Autocon. Of course, there is funding that does not appear as a "sponsorship" per se, but "what you see" is not generally owned by team principals. Last edited by TWK; 4 Dec 2006 at 19:59. |
||
|
4 Dec 2006, 20:05 (Ref:1781946) | #93 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
Patrick Peter and the ACO have a very good idea of what is needed but...they do not see it as their role to invest money in promotion--given the very slim returns. In reality, it makes better sense to negotiate a transport deal for 'flyaway' races than to invest the wedge in marketing.
I believe it is not just promotion. Trying to find any column space in newspapers, magazines etc is nearly impossible. F1 completely dominates to such a degree that there is, literally, no space in the sports sections. Journalists cannot convince the 'powers that be' to run copy on sportscars or, even Le Mans (even if the journo is very sypathetic to sportscars). Autosport, as we know, has virtually no interest in giving sportscars much coverage. They claim that circulation goes down if F1 is not on the cover. I patently do not believe them. Perhaps their paying advertisers (all largely non-F1) should drop advertising in that 'comic' unless greater coverage is given (for their customers) in the sports, touring and Gt car areas. ...or do Haymarket (owners of the Autosport) have other arrangements with the F1 circus. If the national newspapers do not give Le Mans racing any visibility, these other 'fan friendly' ideas at the track will not succeed. This is where the manufacturers' involvement is key. They have marketing departments that will demand coverage. Just over 15 years ago, sportscar racing was deemed to be a huge threat to F1 and Bernie and his pals decimated it. He wanted the manufacturers for himself. Now that many are already there, there are some others who see involvement in F1 an utter waste of money. Hopefully, the LM series (all of them) will pull in more big players. |
|
|
4 Dec 2006, 20:46 (Ref:1781967) | #94 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
I guess I should have been clearer, meaning the LMS and FIA GT races and of course Grand AM. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
4 Dec 2006, 21:23 (Ref:1781994) | #95 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,010
|
Stop all these silly LMP formula and re-introduce the pre-91 Group C regs I say
|
||
__________________
Keep living the dream! |
4 Dec 2006, 22:24 (Ref:1782028) | #96 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
4 Dec 2006, 23:09 (Ref:1782061) | #97 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
5 Dec 2006, 07:45 (Ref:1782211) | #98 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Quote:
If the event is right then the fans will come it may take a little time, but word gets out - look at Goodwood - it needs to be more family friendly - I attended the civil sevice event at Brands Hatch two years ago and there were over 100,000 people. |
|||
|
5 Dec 2006, 08:31 (Ref:1782255) | #99 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
It's getting harder and harder to get that 200,000 coming each year, though. The French still make up the majority of the crowd, but contrivances like Monsieur Loeb racing for Pescarolo are required nowadays to keep the interest. Goodwood has been a spectacular success, it is true, but it isn't racing; it's a fun day out with lots of sexy cars and drivers. If the Britcar 24 was the only 'GT' race of its kind in the UK, it would be a lot easier to get the crowds to that. |
||
|
5 Dec 2006, 08:49 (Ref:1782280) | #100 | |||
Take That Fan
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,121
|
Quote:
Now this brings back to the sportscars, I don't have access to Motors TV which mean's I can't watch either the LMS or the ALMS. However if I am at home and there is an ALMS round then I will listen in on the net and of there was a radio station covering the LMS I would do the same. Last edited by rdjones; 5 Dec 2006 at 08:54. |
|||
__________________
There is only one way of life and thats your own ! ! ! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
As a spectator | IMSA | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 19 Jul 2006 21:23 |
Spectator Count | Fan | ChampCar World Series | 66 | 31 Aug 2004 18:19 |
Spectator Safety | Chris Stockdale | Rallying & Rallycross | 35 | 17 Feb 2003 14:16 |
NASCAR fans interest in NASCAR's other interest | Joe Fan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 13 | 29 Oct 2002 14:27 |
spectator numbers | sazzle | Rallying & Rallycross | 1 | 25 Oct 2002 12:05 |