2012/2013 NZ summer series

[Jerico]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

Try paying attention. Mentioned many tines, MARK PETCH aka the man in the boot.

Mike, stop being purposly thick. You know full well he was part of the group (with others) tasked with coming up with the new NZV8 and used that info to start another series.

So if you know that Mark first initiated the new NZV8, then you

must also know the rest of the story, which would tell everyone

why and how the new ST series got off the ground. You could also

go as far as to explain to us all, why the new NZV8 series never

eventuated and who in the powers be at that time put a stop to it,

which caused the split in the first place.

I actually know the full story and it's a lot different than what you

are trying make everyone believe on this thread.

[Mr Revhead]

Originally Posted by Evomike

Very funny. You have been asked for specfic info on your claims, you have chosen to ignore that and change the subject. You should put the specific illegal actions that have taken place, the ones that you accuse Mark Petch and others of, otherwise you are just speculating.

But I have answered.... Plus its already posted in here many times.
Quit with the games man, bring something new!

[flyingduck]

Originally Posted by NZSTfan

How is preparation for the 2012/2013 summer series going? any more news to report? i have checked both speedcafe and the NZV8 website and have found nothing new. Important things would be nice, like info on the parity testing, maybe some nice shots of the 5 TLX cars all sitting there together just before they all go out on the same track to test the cars and aero packages. Or a driver line up.....just little things really.

But hey, the Interislander is a sponsor.....big news that

They released a few of the names last week, they have a parity program in place which is interesting with the use of data that they are getting out of the motec systems. Seem to be happy with most of the parts in the car including the engine and gearbox and the soft compound tyres seem to be really good.

Sorry this maybe not found on the net info. I got it talking to a couple of the teams.

[Goat Boy]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

What about you gb, care to share you name? Seems every time I cut close to the truth people like to start throwing my name about as if its some kind of threat.
Bunch of kids.

I don't recall mentioning your name of late.

[Goat Boy]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

Good to see a constant level of maturity from you.
I guess that happens when you don't actually have any relavant info.

So, have st let anyone in on the cause of the engine issues yet? All these top engine guys in nz and no clues.... Seems very weird!

Try reading this thread starting yesterday. Yes they do know what the problem was, and yes it's sorted.

[Mr Revhead]

Not quite gb, that was the cock up with 4 rebuilt ones. Not the main ongoing failures

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Jerico

So if you know that Mark first initiated the new NZV8, then you

must also know the rest of the story, which would tell everyone

why and how the new ST series got off the ground. You could also

go as far as to explain to us all, why the new NZV8 series never

eventuated and who in the powers be at that time put a stop to it,

which caused the split in the first place.

I actually know the full story and it's a lot different than what you

are trying make everyone believe on this thread.

Yes what I heard is quite different too, but again, its what I heard, rather that what I know, although I am inclined to trust my source as he has been right in the past, and I suspect Rev is only privvy to someones elses slanted view of events anyway.

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by flyingduck

They released a few of the names last week, they have a parity program in place which is interesting with the use of data that they are getting out of the motec systems. Seem to be happy with most of the parts in the car including the engine and gearbox and the soft compound tyres seem to be really good.

Sorry this maybe not found on the net info. I got it talking to a couple of the teams.

I did hear that there may only be 3 TLX cars at round 1, the other 2 apparantly won't be ready.

[Mr Revhead]

Well if the truth is known, why hide it? That speaks volumes in itself!

[flyingduck]

I heard 4 evo but until we see cars on Track who would know.

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

Well if the truth is known, why hide it? That speaks volumes in itself!

The ship has sailed Rev....a new broom has arrived to deal with both sides and get things back on track.

[Mr Revhead]

In other words your full of it. Put up or shut up.

[Goat Boy]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

Not quite gb, that was the cock up with 4 rebuilt ones. Not the main ongoing failures

That is supposed to have been sorted with the new fix, as far as I know there isn't anything more after that. The rebuilt engines failed due to a mistake, I have not heard anything that the fix, when done properly, won't be the solution everyone is after.

I imagine there will be some testing using a rebuilt engine over the break.

[NZSTfan]

i guess we will all know come mid January. Thanks for the info FD, very informative

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

In other words your full of it. Put up or shut up.

Its funny I said the same thing to you and you didn't put up or shut up....

[Mr Revhead]

But Mike, I already had, and others had too...
You on the other hand have just said "Oh I heard but won't say"
So, if you know the truth, POST IT. What have you got to hide? A major issue and you have the truth but refuse to share.... Really does point to you not knowing, or talking out of your exit hole

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

But Mike, I already had, and others had too...
You on the other hand have just said "Oh I heard but won't say"
So, if you know the truth, POST IT. What have you got to hide? A major issue and you have the truth but refuse to share.... Really does point to you not knowing, or talking out of your exit hole

No you haven't, you just keep saying "Illegal actions" without stating what they are....

[Bill Brown]

Originally Posted by NZSTfan

I believe this is one of the reasons that the ST's didn't visit Teretonga, so no Bill, not a load of ****. Why do you feel it necessary to be so aggresive?

If you re-read my post i was saying that i was dissapointed that the ST's didn't go to some of the other South Island tracks, you managed to completely turn that around....wierd

WELL I DIDN'T YELL AT YOU!!

You will always get an aggressive response from me when you make the suggestion that our circuits are not up to scratch.

Is that the reason that NZST where not at Timaru or Teretonga?

[Mr Revhead]

Bull**** Mike, stop dodging, inform us all of the truth re Petch and co running away and setting up the ST series.

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

But Mike, I already had, and others had too...
You on the other hand have just said "Oh I heard but won't say"
So, if you know the truth, POST IT. What have you got to hide? A major issue and you have the truth but refuse to share.... Really does point to you not knowing, or talking out of your exit hole

and besides its a moot point with the shareholders deciding the way forward (as it should be) not people driven by hatred of one person in particular..

[Mr Revhead]

Originally Posted by Evomike

and besides its a moot point with the shareholders deciding the way forward (as it should be) not people driven by hatred of one person in particular..

So the truth is a moot point.... Yes I can tell you think that from you and your fellow cadre members posts.
Thanks for the clarification

[Evomike]

Originally Posted by Mr Revhead

Bull**** Mike, stop dodging, inform us all of the truth re Petch and co running away and setting up the ST series.

Im not the one making accusations.....

[Goat Boy]

I think the point you seem to be missing, Rev, is that there are several on this forum who have been told of the circumstances leading up to the split (myself included) but from only one or maybe two points of view. And while that is fine for us to make judgement on individually, it would be remiss to actually post it up here as fact when it is still only second-hand information.

Add to that the fact that there is still litigation out there, and most of them would feel that discretion is the better part of valour, and just not comment.

Unless you or I or any of the other posters were actually at the original meeting and know all of the facts leading up to and following on from the split, there is little point in speculating or putting forward another person's point of view, because that view may be biased and/or not include all of the facts.

OK?

[Mr Revhead]

Extremely poor argument for refusing to tell the truth mike

[Mr Revhead]

Originally Posted by Goat Boy

I think the point you seem to be missing, Rev, is that there are several on this forum who have been told of the circumstances leading up to the split (myself included) but from only one or maybe two points of view. And while that is fine for us to make judgement on individually, it would be remiss to actually post it up here as fact when it is still only second-hand information.

Add to that the fact that there is still litigation out there, and most of them would feel that discretion is the better part of valour, and just not comment.

Unless you or I or any of the other posters were actually at the original meeting and know all of the facts leading up to and following on from the split, there is little point in speculating or putting forward another person's point of view, because that view may be biased and/or not include all of the facts.

OK?

So, unless you hear something from 3-4 places you will no longer post it or talk about it?
Good to hear!