|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Mar 2011, 08:37 (Ref:2849917) | #1326 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 690
|
Well done to the guys at RLR! Iv got a feeling this is gonna be a good year for BMW this year.
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 09:04 (Ref:2849925) | #1327 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,056
|
Congrats to ORECA and Highcroft too! Hard luck Audi...but what a great show and race test by the all new Pug 908s...fast and reliable! Match that R18! Well done mon ami!
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 09:14 (Ref:2849928) | #1328 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,737
|
Well what a great race and the sort of result we did not dare to think about, now looking forward to paul ricard and plans to watch at Spa and Le mans already in place
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 09:56 (Ref:2849957) | #1329 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,121
|
I add my congratulations to ORECA(deserving winner, especially Lapierre and Duval), Highcroft(strong contender), Peugeot-Sport(908s globally quite reliable, even if not all perfect)and AUDI...
Congrats to BMW who double win the GT class |
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 10:17 (Ref:2849966) | #1330 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,167
|
so 2011 is a BMW year,at least the beginning is.
so far they finish 1-2 in Daytona24 DP class,1-2 at Sebring12 GT Pro and won Dubai24 overall as well. to me,Audi and ESM share the "worst luck"prize while Falken is named best improvement |
|
|
20 Mar 2011, 11:11 (Ref:2849989) | #1331 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,081
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 11:50 (Ref:2850004) | #1332 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,081
|
Gripping race from start to finish and too many heroes to congratulate. A classic!
There's nothing to add to what's already been said regarding Oreca and Highcroft. Fairytale stuff, and yes, I was welling up big time during those closing laps. I would like to make mention of Rebellion who, in my opinion, also did an outstanding job in what was uncharted territory for the team. For sure, they had a relatively quiet race and didn't enjoy the best of luck under the safety car, but the car held together and (for me) they demonstrated some of the potential of their partnership with Toyota. Good job! |
|
|
20 Mar 2011, 11:56 (Ref:2850007) | #1333 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,829
|
I now think I understand the "gearbox" issue on the #7 908 that needed to be fixed when the car came in for the accident damage. It seems that the car had lost or was losing it's clutch.
Probably had nothing to do with the accident, but that's why Peugeot wanted to run the new 908 at Sebring during the race. As for Dindo and Marc's accident, I saw the replay and to me it was a racing accident. Dindo threw a block but left room on the inside. Marc dove for an opening that closed up and by the time he tried to back out of it, it was too late and the combination of hard braking and the infamous bumps caused his nose to wash out. It happens. You have to remember that in these cars going 150+ mph, that frost heaves feel like speed bumps, and the Pugs have never really taken well to bumpy tracks with their suspension setups. But accidents happen. Although I do doubt that it's any consolation for Audi, they did out-score Peugeot in the points for the ILMC with their 4th and 5th place finishes (vs Peugeot's 3rd and 8th), and Gene did get nailed for speeding entering the pits after he got away from the accident :/ |
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 12:07 (Ref:2850012) | #1334 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,269
|
What if the clutch had been damaged in the accident? Novel idea, eh?
Also, Peugeot have trumped Audi in the manufacturers' points as well, Oreca scores points for Peugeot as a manufacturer. http://tentenths.com/forum/showpost....5&postcount=23 |
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
20 Mar 2011, 12:16 (Ref:2850018) | #1335 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 384
|
I just realised that with that win Oreca added another own record for the now legendary 908 HDI FAP and it's V12, as the car now have scored race wins in five different years (07,08,09,10 and 11).
I don't think many prototypes an brag about such result! (appart the R8) Even after a (short) night of sleep, I'm still impressed by the ARX 01e performance and reliability from yesterday. That car is very well born, it's fast, reliable, good on it's tyres, and probably the best of yesterday's P1 in fuel consumption. Add to that it's run by a nearly perfect team, with a driver line-up which has nothing to envy to Audi and Peugeot. IMO one of the most credible shot at LM this year. I can't believe there aren't tons of companies fighting for being their title sponsor! |
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 12:41 (Ref:2850027) | #1336 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
can someone post here how the points are alocatet 1st to last, and how many cars score points for each manuf, and if any bonus points are added like qualy, best lap.... thanx
|
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
20 Mar 2011, 12:48 (Ref:2850030) | #1337 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
Also the current championship table can be found here. A single point for pole, no point for fastest lap. Only Le Mans has double points. |
|||
|
20 Mar 2011, 12:57 (Ref:2850031) | #1338 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
BMW shoud have 15+13--28 and yet they have in the list 29
corvette ara ok with 20 ferrari should have 8+5+1=14 but they have 15 porsche should have 7+6=13 but thay got 8 ok so i got the whoul +1 point for bmw and ferrari because of more then 12h on the engine maybe, but why did porsche get 8 so could someone explain this couse I anit getting it Last edited by arakis; 20 Mar 2011 at 13:12. |
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
20 Mar 2011, 13:26 (Ref:2850036) | #1339 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
edit: never mind
|
|
|
20 Mar 2011, 13:30 (Ref:2850040) | #1340 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
no i figured out all the point for bmw, 1st 15 2nd 13 and 1pt for the engine running more then 12h 29
corvette 3rd 11 and 4th 9 thats 20, I guess they used new engines for the race ferrari 5th 8pts 8th 5pts and 1pt for qualify, and 1 pt for engine thats 15 but the only problem is porsche wittch shoud at least get 6th 7pts 7th 6tps 13pts but insted it says in the table that thay have 8pts, anyone have any idea why? |
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
20 Mar 2011, 15:48 (Ref:2850071) | #1341 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
so this is the real score after yesterday's race.
ILMC standings after the 12 Hours of Sebring Constructors LM P1: 1. Peugeot, 27 pts ; 2. Audi, 17 ; Aston Martin, 0. LM GTE: 1. BMW, 29 pts ; 2. Corvette, 20 ; 3. Ferrari, 15 ; 4. Porsche, 8 ; 5. Aston Martin et Lotus, 0. Teams LM P1: 1.Team Oreca Matmut, 15 pts ; 2. Peugeot Sport, 12 ; 3. Audi Sport, 9 ; 4. Rebellion Racing, 6. LM P2: 1. Signatech Nissan, 14 pts ; 2. OAK Racing, 11 ; 3. Level 5 Motorsports, 9. LM GTE Pro: 1. BMW Motorsport, 16 pts ; A.F. Corse, 10 ; 3. Luxury Racing, 5. LM GTE Am: 1. Krohn Racing, 15 pts ; 2. Proton Competition, 14. |
||
__________________
pieter melissen |
20 Mar 2011, 17:00 (Ref:2850111) | #1342 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
|||
|
20 Mar 2011, 17:01 (Ref:2850112) | #1343 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
|||
__________________
pieter melissen |
20 Mar 2011, 17:08 (Ref:2850120) | #1344 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
|
|||
|
20 Mar 2011, 17:20 (Ref:2850126) | #1345 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
If you go by the 70% rule, 42 cars were finishers! Pretty good for Sebring.
DK |
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 17:26 (Ref:2850127) | #1346 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
|||
|
20 Mar 2011, 17:28 (Ref:2850129) | #1347 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 492
|
Well, there are a couple of other examples of Class domination over the years, the Porsche 956/62 models were very dominant in thier day. But over the span of years, the R8 was a monster, ESPECIALLY when you consider how neutered it was in it's last two years. Gimme a 2000 spec R8 with R15+ aero and the Pugs might not be so dominant. Is there a stat guy who'd like to total up the number of wins of the R8 compared to the Pug?
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 17:37 (Ref:2850132) | #1348 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
20 Mar 2011, 18:18 (Ref:2850148) | #1349 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 492
|
True, but Audi had to compete against the ACO. Witness 2005. I am not trying to be an Audi Fanboy, usually I rooted against them when I was watching the R8, (Dyson only managed a few wins but those were memorable) but it's dominance of the era was only cut short by limitations put on the car by the rule makers. The Panoz gave it some tests early in it's lifetime but I will agree, the R8 stood head and shoulders above the other cars. The 908, while clearly a little bit better than either of the last two Audi's, has never been able to dominate like the R8 did. And that is most likely as you say, the lack of a credible Manufacturer opponent.
|
||
|
20 Mar 2011, 18:21 (Ref:2850149) | #1350 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 449
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spa track day 'Open Pitlane' 19 March 2011 | pieterbakker | Historic Racing Today | 1 | 14 Feb 2011 17:11 |
'10 ALMS Round 1 • Sebring • March 17th-20th | HORNDAWG | North American Racing | 768 | 17 Apr 2010 04:32 |
ALMS Round 1: Sebring 12h, March 15 2008 | dxk1 | North American Racing | 936 | 8 Apr 2008 17:15 |
ALMS Rnd 1: 12 hours of Sebring 19 Mar 2005 | Fab | North American Racing | 64 | 1 Apr 2005 11:30 |
Sebring 12 Hours - 19 March 2005 | bigal | Trackside | 5 | 10 Mar 2005 03:50 |