|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 Feb 2011, 09:34 (Ref:2826441) | #1376 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,938
|
Looks terrific!
|
||
__________________
280 days...... |
6 Feb 2011, 10:05 (Ref:2826458) | #1377 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Doesnt work for me at all . Any idea are they looking for a LM entry ?
|
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 02:32 (Ref:2827026) | #1378 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
|
Double post, pls delete.
|
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 02:33 (Ref:2827027) | #1379 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
|
|||
|
7 Feb 2011, 03:33 (Ref:2827035) | #1380 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 494
|
|||
|
7 Feb 2011, 05:06 (Ref:2827048) | #1381 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 05:13 (Ref:2827051) | #1382 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
7 Feb 2011, 10:57 (Ref:2827147) | #1383 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Now , that looks good on the Porker .
|
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 13:00 (Ref:2827218) | #1384 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 901
|
Sascha Maassen was their third driver for the endurance races, but after Pickett was injured Luhr joined for Petit.
|
|
|
7 Feb 2011, 17:01 (Ref:2827327) | #1385 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,609
|
|||
|
7 Feb 2011, 17:22 (Ref:2827339) | #1386 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
|
As did Timo Bernhard. No factory drivers?!
Most Aston factory drivers seem to need to bring their own budget these days, to be quite honest. Still hopeful that we see Mucke/Enge/Turner out in P1s this year, but it doesn't seem like that will be the case at Sebring, does it? |
||
|
7 Feb 2011, 18:12 (Ref:2827357) | #1387 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 66
|
It's definitely a down year, but I don't want the plug pulled on Prototypes. I've always liked the prototypes and love watching them weave through the slower cars. I'm hoping that six to eight non LMPC prototypes per race. What are we looking at for LMPC this year?
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 01:00 (Ref:2827528) | #1388 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 494
|
|||
|
8 Feb 2011, 01:55 (Ref:2827536) | #1389 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
Whats the word from DR about a Sebring start . Last I heard , he was saying that it was possible , at a push ..... but if it did happen , there would only be one car . |
|||
|
8 Feb 2011, 02:18 (Ref:2827540) | #1390 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
sorry wrong quote.
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 02:24 (Ref:2827541) | #1391 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
.....do mean like Audi? Same parent company.
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 02:26 (Ref:2827542) | #1392 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
why are there so few ALMS non ILMC race entries? Is there a plan to return manufacturer intrest in ALMS or what?
|
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
8 Feb 2011, 02:37 (Ref:2827543) | #1393 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
|
Quote:
Audi have typically let their drivers show up in non-competing events like the Rolex. Lucas drove for Level 5 last year, and Allan McNish drove a Crawfod a couple of times some years back if memory serves, but I cannot remember if that was during his Audi sabattical. Romain and Timo are obviously separate cases, since they're swapping between brands under a common ownership umbrella. |
|||
|
8 Feb 2011, 08:29 (Ref:2827600) | #1394 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
8 Feb 2011, 12:52 (Ref:2827734) | #1395 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
ILMC pretty much eliminated the need for manufacturers in the P categories to enter the ALMS, not that the ALMS didn't have some issues already. It would appear as though reliance on the Challenge classes is the future for now.
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 13:07 (Ref:2827755) | #1396 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
I still hope that there is a GT-only plan stacked away in some drawer in Braselburg... at least for next year.
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 13:10 (Ref:2827756) | #1397 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
If that is so they should have added at Least Laguna Seca to the ILMC calendar, I mean 3 out of 5 races of the LMS calendar have been chosen and the LMS is much less interesting, less watched, then ALMS races! it seems the aco is trying to ruin the ALMS, I hope they figure something out and survieve the hardships of the comming season
|
||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
8 Feb 2011, 13:17 (Ref:2827760) | #1398 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8 Feb 2011, 17:49 (Ref:2827905) | #1399 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
I see no reason why the privateer field in the ALMS would not follow what is happening in the LMS.
Regulation anomalies and circumstances may dictate ALMS teams are a season or two behind their European equivalents but it isn't going to be lost on them or their sponsors Cytosport will dominate media and fan interest or the folly of anyone but a team of ESM's funding to attempt to take on Corvette. This has been debated how many times this winter and we are still a month away from Sebring, the only certainty is things will be much clearer come the latter half of 2011. As of now most teams seem to be in a holding pattern from 2010 and haven't given any indication what their longer term plans are, the only indicator is what European teams chose when faced with similar cost, class, car options. Factory participation in the ALMS is another question entirely, you can only look at how the series has faired since the economy crashed and ask whether manufacturers view the ALMS differently if they compete in LMP or GT as both classes are part of the ILMC. Last edited by JAG; 8 Feb 2011 at 17:58. |
|
|
8 Feb 2011, 18:15 (Ref:2827918) | #1400 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ILMC 2011 Discussion | HORNDAWG | ACO Regulated Series | 692 | 13 Nov 2011 19:10 |
LMS 2011 Discussion | HORNDAWG | ACO Regulated Series | 479 | 26 Sep 2011 05:12 |
360MRC, next time (2011) - Discussion re Car Eligibility etc | SAMD | Historic Racing Today | 241 | 24 Aug 2010 07:34 |
ALMS 2009 Discussion | Mal | North American Racing | 2888 | 22 Sep 2009 07:20 |
ALMS 2008 discussion | brielga | North American Racing | 1290 | 8 Oct 2008 18:34 |