Alternative 6 hour? - Page 8

terence · 25 Jun 2009, 18:39 (Ref:2624656)

I hate curry!! I'm OK with Steak and Chips though.

Mike Wroe · 25 Jun 2009, 20:21 (Ref:2624657)

I've only just caught up with this thread but you can definately count me in assuming I have an eligible car, I can understand the proposal to have a late cut off date whether it be mid eighties or whatever but IMO there should be no start date if you want plenty of entries, similarly I think any capacity restrictions could be counter productive. The important thing is that the event be at least fully and preferably oversubscribed to ensure its viability and continuation. I'd be happy to do some of the leg work to get it off the ground if I can be off any assistance.

Lancsbreaker · 25 Jun 2009, 21:00 (Ref:2624658)

New member on here...pointed this way from Alfaowner....but a competitor in Future Classics - in a car that would be reliable enough (its done 3 seasons without engine or box being touched) but is probably just too young (a 1988 944 turbo).

Interested in the concept though, wherever it is.....despite all the Southerners who think anywhere more than an hour from home is the end of the earth

. If our car isn't eligible, would be prepared to assist in organising / /marshalling / safety car duties, whatever......

terence · 25 Jun 2009, 21:41 (Ref:2624659)

Sorry but no Turbo's allowed.Thanks for the offer though,will keep you in the loop.

ChrisA · 25 Jun 2009, 22:16 (Ref:2624660)

Quote:

Originally Posted by terence bower

Sorry but no Turbo's allowed.

Thats definitely NO curry then

**Peter Mallett** · 26 Jun 2009, 05:03 (Ref:2624661)

Locations depend on capacity and capability. It tends to narrow things down unfortunately.

**Peter Mallett** · 26 Jun 2009, 05:49 (Ref:2624662)

Of course we all forget sometimes that a six hour race will need more than one driver so those who may fall foul of any eligibility rules could still get a drive. In fact it makes economical and safety sense to share the drive anyway.

delta · 26 Jun 2009, 07:13 (Ref:2624663)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Mallett

Of course we all forget sometimes that a six hour race will need more than one driver so those who may fall foul of any eligibility rules could still get a drive. In fact it makes economical and safety sense to share the drive anyway.

Hit the nail on the head there Peter.

**Tim Falce** · 26 Jun 2009, 07:16 (Ref:2624664)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Mallett

Of course we all forget sometimes that a six hour race will need more than one driver so those who may fall foul of any eligibility rules could still get a drive. In fact it makes economical and safety sense to share the drive anyway.

Do mean that some people would consider doing a six hour race on their own?

jerryk · 26 Jun 2009, 07:21 (Ref:2624665)

Quote:

Originally Posted by falcemob

Do mean that some people would consider doing a six hour race on their own?

yes

delta · 26 Jun 2009, 07:23 (Ref:2624666)

I would have a compulsory 2 plus driver team. No failed F3 drivers to be brought in.

**Peter Mallett** · 26 Jun 2009, 08:07 (Ref:2624667)

Quote:

Originally Posted by delta

I would have a compulsory 2 plus driver team. No failed F3 drivers to be brought in.

Agreed re the first point and as to the second, we know who you mean.

delta · 26 Jun 2009, 09:13 (Ref:2624668)

I hope Terrance wont be offended.

johngee · 26 Jun 2009, 09:18 (Ref:2624669)

Quote:

Originally Posted by delta

I hope Terrance wont be offended.

Why? I spend a lot of effort trying to offend him!

one-two · 26 Jun 2009, 09:48 (Ref:2624670)

Just out of interest, why would no turbos be allowed? (Terry's post of a little while ago)

Mike Bell · 26 Jun 2009, 12:08 (Ref:2624671)

I keep meaning to make a contribution to this thread but every time I look there are so many new posts! Great idea, would be keen to enter if I had a suitable car or was able to join forces with someone who had!

When watching the Spa 6hrs last year I was impressed enough to dream of another project car for such an endurance event. Was thinking of pre '65 appK for max choice of races, so bit disappointed that this UK germ of an idea does not include- maybe there could be a class for them with max number or something?

Voted for S'stone despite living near another choice for reasons already mentioned by others, and think the concept of running it on a non-profit basis is excellent. Hope something comes of the idea- the enthusiasm generated so far is promising!

johngee · 26 Jun 2009, 12:15 (Ref:2624672)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Bell

and think the concept of running it on a non-profit basis is excellent. Hope something comes of the idea- the enthusiasm generated so far is promising!

The 'not for profit' concept is, I think, a major USP.

. The structure that we're working on should prevent a 'not for loss' either!

MartinSmith · 26 Jun 2009, 12:20 (Ref:2624673)

Quote:

Originally Posted by johngee

The 'not for profit' concept is, I think, a major USP.

. !

Get you with your TLA's...lol...althought I totally agree

Colin McKay · 26 Jun 2009, 12:36 (Ref:2624674)

2 drivers a must. I wouldn't want to be out there with someone who's done 6 hours.

BTW, already chosen the car, drawn up the spec and shortlisted a couple of drivers. Now its up to the committee to make sure their regs fit

johngee · 26 Jun 2009, 12:42 (Ref:2624675)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin McKay

2 drivers a must. I wouldn't want to be out there with someone who's done 6 hours.

BTW, already chosen the car, drawn up the spec and shortlisted a couple of drivers. Now its up to the committee to make sure their regs fit

I was thinking in terms of "No one driver should drive for more than 2 hours in a continuous period and 4 hours in total"

Any comments welcome?

**Peter Mallett** · 26 Jun 2009, 12:50 (Ref:2624676)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Bell

I keep meaning to make a contribution to this thread but every time I look there are so many new posts! Great idea, would be keen to enter if I had a suitable car or was able to join forces with someone who had!

This is essentially aimed at those who race classic cars post 1965 because there's little out there in the way of long distance events. Personally I'll run Group 1.5 as I do now and as was run in the 70's at the Spa 24hrs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Bell

When watching the Spa 6hrs last year I was impressed enough to dream of another project car for such an endurance event. Was thinking of pre '65 appK for max choice of races, so bit disappointed that this UK germ of an idea does not include- maybe there could be a class for them with max number or something?

Of course if this is successful (as I'm sure it will be) it may well open up a new event where the possibility of two owner cars could be considered. Worth building one just for the event if you like.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Bell

Voted for S'stone despite living near another choice for reasons already mentioned by others, and think the concept of running it on a non-profit basis is excellent. Hope something comes of the idea- the enthusiasm generated so far is promising!

Yes, I agree as far as circuit choice is concerned. It ticks all the boxes, although I will say that I genuinely love the challenge of the International circuit.

andy97 · 26 Jun 2009, 12:52 (Ref:2624677)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Bell

When watching the Spa 6hrs last year I was impressed enough to dream of another project car for such an endurance event. Was thinking of pre '65 appK for max choice of races, so bit disappointed that this UK germ of an idea does not include- maybe there could be a class for them with max number or something?

I suppose that the point is that there are already places to race Pre 65 cars & Sports Racers in an endurance format, Spa, VdeV etc etc, & there's Britcar for the modern stuff but to my (maybe limited) knowledge, no one has yet put on an endurance event for the 65-85 year range aimed at a wide variety of production cars and drivers who otherwise wouldn't have the chance to race in this sort of format.

**Peter Mallett** · 26 Jun 2009, 12:52 (Ref:2624678)

Quote:

Originally Posted by johngee

I was thinking in terms of "No one driver should drive for more than 2 hours in a continuous period and 4 hours in total

Agreed. In fact I'd surmise there are few cars that will go for longer than 2 hours on a tankfull anyway.

Colin McKay · 26 Jun 2009, 12:54 (Ref:2624679)

Quote:

Originally Posted by johngee

I was thinking in terms of "No one driver should drive for more than 2 hours in a continuous period and 4 hours in total"

Any comments welcome?

That would mean a minimum of 4 shifts unless stops are timed to the second, maybe better to allow 2h15m stints so that there's a little flexibilty on handovers. Does that make sense?

johngee · 26 Jun 2009, 13:36 (Ref:2624680)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin McKay

That would mean a minimum of 4 shifts unless stops are timed to the second, maybe better to allow 2h15m stints so that there's a little flexibilty on handovers. Does that make sense?

Good comment Colin. However, my (and I emphasise 'my') thinking is to not be too presciptive and leave a bit of creative room for some good old fashioned 'long distance race tactics'

View Poll Results: Which cars max 3.5litres
Sportscars 1968 - 1985	16	45.71%
Sportscars Up to 1985	6	17.14%
GT 1968 - 1985	2	5.71%
GT Up to 1985	5	14.29%
Saloons 1968 - 1985	5	14.29%
Saloons Up to 1985	4	11.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
15 August 2010 - Alternative 6 hour? (YES, organised by the 360MRC)	Podd37	Historic Racing Today	1290	6 Jul 2019 11:04