|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 May 2004, 01:15 (Ref:988778) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 416
|
Mercedes Thinking
Mercedes must be getting extremely embarassed by the F1 project at the moment. Hardly what I believe they would like to portray as there image particularly, as reliability is touted as one of there road cars "values".
McLaren must be also very agitated by them and I believe that there must be some ultimatums either about to be delivered or being delviered. Very much like McLaren did when Peugeot was the engine supplier. Will Mercedes do a Peugeot and withdraw from F1 if they cannot get there act together this year. I understand the situation is a little different in the fact that Mercedes have some equity in McLaren. However I am sure there must be some performance clauses and hence penalties for Merc in the contract somewhere. What does the forum think? |
||
__________________
"Rules are for the interpretation of wise men and the obedience of fools." Colin Chapman |
31 May 2004, 01:29 (Ref:988784) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 97
|
Is it really all down to Mercedes?
is the installation of the engine in the Mac a contributing factor? enough cooling? the right control systems? I don't know but it seems strange that the engines are suddenly so fragile this year, I know that they made changes for the one engine rule but i would have expected them to blow towards the end of a race not in the first 20 laps or so (or during Friday and Saturday running) |
|
|
31 May 2004, 01:31 (Ref:988785) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 265
|
I watched the race at a friend's on his bigggggggggg screen TV. Then we had a cook out on his new grill.
His wife said the grill has to have a name. After a brief discussion, it was named Mercedes because of its shiny stainless steel grey appearance and it does light up in flames. lol |
|
__________________
Life is not a spectator sport! |
31 May 2004, 01:43 (Ref:988789) | #4 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,776
|
Re: Mercedes Thinking
Quote:
The thing with Peugeot is they never really made it. Mercedes have won World Championships and they're on their back foot at the moment. The whole point of manufacturers in F1 is to sell road cars. They want to get back on top. They have things to prove. |
|||
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach. |
31 May 2004, 02:13 (Ref:988799) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 901
|
This year is right up there with their Le Mans campaign! Haven't been back there since.
|
||
|
31 May 2004, 02:17 (Ref:988802) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
From all the comments i've seen and also common sense suggests....
they took too many risks in the development and some of them are biting back Now they can either iron out the problems,start again from scratch or (if they now have a good understanding of the problems) redesign the engine slightly to eliminate the problem areas (using most of the old parts) Unfortunately none of these options are easy or quick,Adrien Newey suggested it'll be next year before they are equal with others and the year after before thay are king of the heap again....if that's what they want! All they can do is grin and bear it 'till it's all back on track But i do think mac will persevere with merc |
||
|
31 May 2004, 02:19 (Ref:988803) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
|
I cant see Mercedes walking away a failure.It would destroy there image so they will hang around and if possible the current problem will be turned into a cleaver marketing tool.
The Grumpy1 |
|
|
31 May 2004, 04:39 (Ref:988843) | #8 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 67
|
The image for Mercedes Benz now is , BANG BANG BANG BANG !!!!!!!? isn,t about time they fixed it. The staff want a vey large and hard kick where it really hurts....May be some very new talent... Their corporate image is ??????????????????????????
|
|
|
31 May 2004, 07:26 (Ref:988887) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Fortunately for them, DTM is helping Merc to save their faces.
AFAK F1 is being a source of continuous humiliations. They are somewhat forced to stay in, but something has to change radically. I'm really surprised that, whereas FW have replaced patrick Head, at Macs nothing has changed though performances have been 1,000 times worse. |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
31 May 2004, 07:40 (Ref:988898) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,811
|
I don't think it all that likely that Mercedes will walk away from Formula One, tail between legs, and let BMW dominate the perception of German motorsport around the world.
Perhaps the man under the most strain is Norbert Haug. He's helped McLaren to two world titles (drivers and constructors) in the late 90s by running Mercedes' Formula One campaigns, but I would have thought his direction would be where Ron and Adrian are directing most of their questions. |
||
__________________
"Brakes are no good. They only make you go slower." - Tazio Nuvolari |
31 May 2004, 07:46 (Ref:988901) | #11 | ||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
How much is Mercs fault and how much is the parc ferme thing causing teams to front up with sick engines on race day when they could have been repaired/replaced?,is it just me or has there been a lot more engine failures this season?
|
||
|
31 May 2004, 07:48 (Ref:988902) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
The parc ferme rule is the same for everybody; furthermore DC run with a new engine, and had the same problem of Kimi.
Therefore if the merc engine doesn't work, it cannot be at a rule's fault, it simply doesn't work. Last edited by climb; 31 May 2004 at 07:49. |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
31 May 2004, 08:11 (Ref:988915) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 416
|
It is clear that Mercedes is having a problem with the engine and it is the worst in the pack for reliability.
Mercedes has walked away with failure before. Le Mans with the flipper. I agree it seems strange there is no public reshuffles from Merc. |
||
__________________
"Rules are for the interpretation of wise men and the obedience of fools." Colin Chapman |
31 May 2004, 08:28 (Ref:988924) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,417
|
There was a coment on the coverage last night that Martin Whitemarsh CEO of McLaren had now also taken responsibility for Ilmor
|
||
__________________
BAZINGA! |
31 May 2004, 08:47 (Ref:988942) | #15 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 67
|
What difference will Martin Whitemarsh make to Ilmor.? Has he got the ability to instill the winning culture into the ILMOR organisation? The culture of this company has a long way to go to be winners again....
|
|
|
31 May 2004, 08:50 (Ref:988945) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,417
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
31 May 2004, 09:08 (Ref:988972) | #17 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 67
|
Really what is he doing at Mc Laren .At this time we are unawear where the problem is. Engine or installation in the chassis .What ever is the situation, he is ultimatley responsible for the mistakes...better his hide than mine or yours.....
|
|
|
31 May 2004, 09:54 (Ref:989023) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
I think the main problem with the engines is that the Merc engine guru (can't remember his name, used to work at BMW) and Mario Illien aren't even on speaking terms.
McLaren problems or not, how do you improve and engine system when the two guys in charge of the company making it won't even talk to each other? |
|
|
31 May 2004, 11:35 (Ref:989136) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 679
|
personally i derive great pleasure from mclaren's current woes.....
|
||
__________________
"Drinking makes such fools of people, and people are such fools to begin with that it's compounding a felony." Robert Benchley |
31 May 2004, 11:49 (Ref:989152) | #20 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,774
|
Schadenfreude, a noble emotion.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 May 2004, 12:37 (Ref:989194) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
31 May 2004, 13:44 (Ref:989258) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,534
|
I have noticed that it always seems to be the left hand bank that fils, Anyone have any ideas why?
|
||
__________________
Mos Eisley spaceport, A more wretched hive of scum and villiany you will not find anywhere in the galaxy, we must be careful. |
31 May 2004, 14:25 (Ref:989291) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
It's not unknown for companies who have previously enjouyed great success to walk away while failing, and return later, stronger - Renault in 1985 and Honda in 1992 for example. Maybe that is what Mercedes should do.
However, not only do they own part of the team, but I suspect they will be looking to later buy it out. Having Martin Whitmarsh moved across might help, because hwe's got a very strong record, but it does mean they'll need to reorganise in the short term, when (like Williams) they urgently need ot focus on on-track matters. |
||
|
31 May 2004, 14:42 (Ref:989302) | #24 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
31 May 2004, 18:22 (Ref:989470) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33
|
OT, but with a Merc buyout of McLaren, do you suppose a change in top management? Any chance Newey, Dennis, and others would be replaced? Thing is, McLaren is a big diverse organization, and they have other projects beside the F1 team...
|
||
__________________
"Trying is the first step towards failure" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What WAS McLaren thinking.... | RaceFreak | Formula One | 19 | 26 Jul 2003 12:57 |
just thinking again | wreckless | Racing Technology | 9 | 28 Jan 2003 01:37 |
just thinking | wreckless | Racing Technology | 2 | 26 Nov 2002 08:38 |
What /were/ they thinking ?! | fatbloke | Motorsport History | 16 | 20 Jun 2000 17:13 |