|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Jan 2010, 06:02 (Ref:2610336) | #226 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 06:21 (Ref:2610338) | #227 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
I am not an expert in American racing but it seems to me that what ALMS really needs is to build a strong base of private teams that are in it for fun. The trouble with manufacturers is that they come and go to suit their marketing strategy and always will.
This is where the LMS is winning in that it has created a base of 50 odd cars that are largely privateer base and are probably in it for the long haul. LMS is not without problems and the ACO could learn a lot from the way ALMS runs and promotes its race weekends, but it does usually have a good car count. Why is it then that the American privateers are not attracted to ALMS - are there other better options - or too many options? or is it Grand Am that takes them away? |
||
|
9 Jan 2010, 06:39 (Ref:2610340) | #228 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
GA, NASA, SCCA, and SWC certainly grab some of them. Others probably don't want to deal with the works, or works-supported, teams anyway. Most of the private chassis builders of LMPs are European, which has an impact on how easy and expensive it is to get equipment. Also, Europe has ~800 million people, whereas there are only ~300 million here in the States (and it's still only ~450 million people if you include Mexico and Canada), which likely means there are simply fewer privateers over here to begin with.
Huge, I think the point being made was that a number of the posters here think, and rightly so, that a majority of the LMIC events will be in Europe right from the off. If making North American races part of the LMIC is not a real added draw for manufacturers to run those races over here, the LMIC will basically become exclusively held over in Europe, but the manufacturers have already pulled out of full-time commitment to the LMS. Therefore, what would then be the point of having an LMIC at all? Last edited by Purist; 9 Jan 2010 at 06:47. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Jan 2010, 07:28 (Ref:2610352) | #229 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
9 Jan 2010, 14:26 (Ref:2610505) | #230 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
1. North Americans want to see the best pilots and teams in ALMS 2. Europeans want to see, also, the best pilots and teams in the LMS 3. If this is all about 'saving our (series) ass' in this economical down turn... than may the best win! The alternative is joining forces in a global series: LMIC is the way to have the best pilots and the best team in both series. Missing what point? That without works entries and big professional pilots ALMS will fall down? That we, Europeans (LMS), have to contempt with the lesser good pilots and the privateers? The best for ALMS and the rest for LMS? Missing the point? The point is that ALMS has to change with or without LMIC. A series based only on manufactures and professionals pilots canot sustain herself forever. Even the big, fat and lasy F1 sorted that out this last two years with Honda, Toyota and BMW (Renault is just a name for 2010) pulling the plug. Things over there already had the warning light blipping before even anything resemble to LMIC start to be talked. Maybe ACO rules are the problem... maybe they don't adjust to the way of the things over there... maybe the best in reality is for IMSA go a totally independent way to 'save' north american sportscar scene... well, IMSA sportscar scene |
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 14:31 (Ref:2610508) | #231 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
Solutions? 1. Keep things as they have been? Works on ALMS and privateers in LMS? 2. Creating a global series? 3. Fight for the survival of the best... series? |
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 14:42 (Ref:2610511) | #232 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
The problem with lack of privateers in US, probably as more to do with the fact that in the ALMS everything has to be so damn professional and hard to reach to the privateers and gentlemen-drivers. How many works team are in Indy, Nascar, ou Grand-Am? Quote:
Did ACO said it? Where? The point is: There will be in 2010 equal round is North-America, Europe an Asia, and for 2011, the only thing we know is that they want a minimum of 6 rounds... And, manufactures will always want to go at sebring and petit le mans... the problem with audi this year was not LMIC but the changes that they had to made in car and the fact that Peugeot was not available to accept an Audi is sebring not complying 100% with the rules. |
||||
|
9 Jan 2010, 14:45 (Ref:2610514) | #233 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
That's something that they don't seem to understand... if they are 'going', is not their fault! It's LMIC, ACO, whatever, fault!
|
||
|
9 Jan 2010, 14:53 (Ref:2610515) | #234 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
Quote:
No question about that |
||||
|
9 Jan 2010, 16:08 (Ref:2610534) | #235 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
There won't be any "joining of forces", as NASCAR can just wait things out, if that's all they have to do, and then have complete control of this arena too, at which point, they may just dump GA too to concentrate on NASCAR itself. There's been a lot of talk since the takeover that NASCAR seems to be putting the big bike series over here in a situation where it'll be run into the ground in the next few years.
This is a bit odd, but it sounds like you want the factories for Europe and you want the ALMS to now make due with privateers, but I thought privateers were too fickle to be counted on. I might mention that manufacturer dollars in promotion of events is probably no small part of why ALMS races have been so well attended. As for American factories, Corvette is in GT2, Chrysler is in no position to make a real commitment, and Ford may see fit to support the GT program, after the Robertson car grabbed pole at PLM. However, the "Big Three" have of late cut back their NASCAR involvement, which means there's no chance of an American prototype any time soon. Let's face it, NASCAR in the wider spectrum is the only show in town in motorsport in the US (aside from the Indy 500 itself); that sanction body has the manufacturers' attentions, and they have no reason to change that as the ALMS is nowhere by comparison. And really, even with IMSA, we largely counted on European and Japanese equipment in the GTP ranks. I mean, how many races did the Corvette GTP actually win and how many cars did they ever have on track? The Pontiac Fiero GTP? The Ford Mustang/Probe GTP? The Chevy Intrepid GTP? Now, how many wins did the Porsche 962 pick up and how many cars did they have on track? The Nissan ZXT/NPT GTP? The Eagle Toyota GTP? The point is, there hasn't been the real commitment by any one of the "Big Three" to sportscar racing in the top class(es) since the original GT40. Compared to that effort, the Ford C100, Chrysler/Mopar LMP, and Cadillac Northstar LMP were all rather small blips on the radar. You are incorrect; Sebring and PLM are being run strictly to ACO regulations this year, so Audi and Peugeot have no excuse not to show. Just about every NASCAR team gets some sort of works support/backing. They either get it directly, or indirectly through whichever engine shop they get their motors from. GA has teams who are effectively the chassis constructors' works teams in DP. Brumos has gotten Porsche factory support. The main Porsche protagonists in GA GT get factory support. The #07 Corvette and the Stevenson Camaros are Pratt & Miller jobs, so those teams are getting some factory support from Chevy. You also have to realize that a lot of those GA GTs are tube-framers, so those cars are much more optimized in some ways right from the get-go, but I would expect that Mazda isn't completely in the back seat when it comes to those RX-8s. Indy doesn't need factory teams; Penske and Ganassi are effectively filling that role just fine in relation to the rest of the field as things are right now. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Jan 2010, 17:23 (Ref:2610570) | #236 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
The Le Mans series of events are run under international rules , meaning ALMS , AsLMS and LMS ..... so then Grand-Am should fall into place , not the other way around . Politics over Porsche against the first 962 , the Porsche LM P1 and the 996 gt3 RSR spring to mind . |
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 18:03 (Ref:2610598) | #237 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
I can admit that probably that would not work with nowadays state of things, but i wont admit that the future of sportscar is depending of having a full professional factory backed ALMS, leaving us over here wit the left overs.... That is not an option. Not even the reverse... The fact is, ALMS needs the privateers as much LMS needs factory teams... Sorry but you didn't understant. Audi said (believe it or not) that they could not make the necessary arrangement in order to the R15 be according with the 2010 set or rules. They asked Peugeot if they didn't mind if they ddo Sebring with an half 2009 spec/half 2010 spec R15, and Peugeot said no! Audi will be at Petit Le Mans for the LMIC round, but not in Sebring for the reason i explained. Peugeot is going to Sebring to prepare Le Mans, but not a PLM because they wont do LMIC 'couse there is no budget. |
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 19:20 (Ref:2610643) | #238 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,056
|
regardless of who get's who and what gets what, a "world" cup or series is only as strong as it's participants. in order to have the world's best and the most teams, there needs to be reasons for them to join. only one race in Asia and two races in the States plus LM doesn't seem to be enough motivation for teams to put forth the effort; i could be wrong. if the ALMS folds or the AsLMS fails to get off the ground, there will be voids in LMIC idea.
there IS a place in WORLD sportscars for North American teams and Asian teams (and drivers). not having them involved, for whatever reason, will make a "world" cup/series a joke. i don't follow the in's and out's of the rules changes (only what i read here), but what i can gather, there needs to be more inclusion and less segregation from all sanctioning bodies or we may soon be left with one race in June. extreme thought, but isn't it possible? more possible is only a ELMS and LM in a couple of years. |
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
9 Jan 2010, 21:58 (Ref:2610715) | #239 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
If you're taking about the bodywork issues on the Audi R15, didn't they get a waiver, along with several of the other existing LMPs, so that the 2010 rule changes are effectively just for new cars?
LM.pt, the trouble with your idea of factories and privateers in terms of a mix is that you effectively need four manufacturers in a given class, otherwise one side of the pond or the other is likely to have utter factory domination by one make in their series because the automakers don't seem to be running full efforts on both continents at the moment. Now, if you had Audi and Acura in the States and Aston and Peugeot in Europe, that might work for LMP1, but that hasn't happened. LMP2 isn't supposed to be for factories. You rarely had multiple, concurrent serious efforts in GTS/GT1. The Vipers still largely had the Corvettes swamped until Oreca pulled out to work on the LMP. Lister and Prodrive/Ferrari had some reasonable success, but were relatively short-lived. Saleen didn't provide adequate support. Prodrive/Aston in GT1 was short-lived too, and we really don't know how Vitaphone Maserati would measure up to the Corvette factory. Also, in the classes other than P1, the LMS has seemed to be less open to the idea of works or semi-works teams than has been the case in the ALMS, which leaves you with a built-in discrepancy between the two series at the moment. Remember that when the M3 GTRs came out in 2001, Schnitzer chose to run in the ALMS too, alongside PTG. Audi wasn't in the LMS for that series' first 3-4 seasons. The Porsche and Acura programs were specifically for North America, and the new M3 GT2s were spawned by BMW North America. Ferrari and Porsche do have squads in Europe that are just as professional as those in the ALMS. I don't think you can be that surprised that the Corvette factory focus is here in the ALMS. Unfortunately, in Eurpope, Spyker can't put up as strong a fight as the major players in GT2, and Aston Martin has neglected the Vantage since they started on their P1 program. And, sadly, just as they had it GT2 homologated, the Gillet Vertigo has simply disappeared. It just seems to me that, given the choice and the budget, factory efforts prefer to run the ALMS over the LMS. Given the relative crowds and exposure at a given event, I would suspect that the ALMS gives better bang for the buck for manufacturers. If that's the case, the LMS needs to get to work on promotions. You also should realize that no world series will happen without major manufacturer backing. With just Audi and Peugeot potentially for 2010, I don't see there being enough of that backing for something like this to work on its own merits. In the Group C era, you had 4-8 automakers at any given time. And there never really were fewer than 4, until 1991 that is. It takes the big bucks to go globetrotting, get together enough cars across the globe to make a decent grid, and effective promotion on such a massive scale isn't cheap either. Last edited by Purist; 9 Jan 2010 at 22:04. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
9 Jan 2010, 22:05 (Ref:2610719) | #240 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
You can see the list on Mike's site. |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
9 Jan 2010, 22:08 (Ref:2610724) | #241 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,736
|
So has anyone made a list of who's confirmed yet for the IC?
2 Audis 2 Peugeots 1 Drayson Who else? |
|
|
9 Jan 2010, 22:17 (Ref:2610727) | #242 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 22:17 (Ref:2610728) | #243 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
1x Audi R10 | Team Kolles 1x Lola B08 Judd | Drayson Racing .... that's it Peugeot wont com in 2010. Quesnel is a strong supporter of a world series, but there is no budget after Le Mans, besides for the new LMP |
|||
|
9 Jan 2010, 22:35 (Ref:2610735) | #244 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
As for the rest, thanks for your explanations. This is the reason why i came to this forum... to talk an to learn. Let me finish with this. I've started to watch sportscar racing during Group C era in the 80s and i saw the world championship being ripped off for the survivable of F1, and it would be a youth dream to see a World Championship on the track. |
|||
|
10 Jan 2010, 01:30 (Ref:2610784) | #245 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,056
|
|||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
10 Jan 2010, 08:17 (Ref:2610854) | #246 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,451
|
I am curious to see where ACO is going to place the Asian race. It's a fact they can't race in big China so they have to go to Japan again.
|
|
|
10 Jan 2010, 10:35 (Ref:2610895) | #247 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
10 Jan 2010, 12:07 (Ref:2610955) | #248 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 72
|
I'm guessing Japan would be the most likely candidate to host such an event. Suzuka would be a great venue for a 500km to 8 Hour event consisting of about 50 GT and LMP cars.
|
||
|
10 Jan 2010, 14:37 (Ref:2611020) | #249 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,056
|
Okayama and Fuji, come to mind as well...Shanghai was planned but canceled and then there is Malaysia.
many choices, but i would love to see LM cars at Suzuka... |
||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
10 Jan 2010, 14:54 (Ref:2611024) | #250 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
They had a great race back in 1991 with the 905 (the first edition) |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Le Mans Series 2010 | HORNDAWG | ACO Regulated Series | 1144 | 21 Sep 2010 14:08 |
2010 Le Mans Classic | john ruston | Historic Racing Today | 487 | 25 Aug 2010 19:35 |
[LM24 Race] Le Mans 2010 - Who's going? | Craig | 24 Heures du Mans | 416 | 10 Jun 2010 22:11 |
[LM24] Changes to facilities at Le Mans 2010 | GT6 | 24 Heures du Mans | 32 | 3 Dec 2009 20:28 |
LM Intercontinental Cup (thread closed) | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 32 | 1 Sep 2009 15:51 |