|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
18 Oct 2017, 13:47 (Ref:3774862) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,406
|
Overall some good points raised guys, the 90 and 60 degree motors from Nissan-Cosworth, Honda and Nissan-GT, numerous V8's have all been massaged into the Adess, Oreca and Ligier chassis, so squeezing in the 72 degree bank angle of the V10 should not be a problem for an LMP1
Then I guess its just a case of length.......the V10 is 622mm long......as a guide the DB V8 is 516mm......the HK V8 is 584mm.......so it sounds doable. I'm surprised of no mention about direct injection as its worth about 5% fuel save.......a biggy for WEC type racing, it will need to be implemented at some point. Overall I would love to see this V10 motor back in endurance racing, hopefully a new LMP1 customer will take the plunge once the chassis orders start to flow for Oreca, Ginetta and BR-Dallara. |
||
|
18 Oct 2017, 15:22 (Ref:3774874) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
Quote:
Cosworth said years ago that they have a v8 turbo (build over the base of the old IRL v8 NA engine), but it needed money (from the customer) to finish the development. |
|||
|
14 Apr 2017, 13:42 (Ref:3726361) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,439
|
So another addition to LMP1 hopefully, the more the merrier. I wish whoever runs it all the best
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
15 Apr 2017, 09:44 (Ref:3726536) | #4 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 246
|
If they manage to stay at the minimum LMP1-NH allowed weight and have approximately a similar downforce package compared to current p2, they can be much quicker. It would be 100 kg less. This is more than 3 seconds in certain tracks...
Theoretically the rules should help them now, at least being quicker than the LMP2 field. The engine should also have at least a bit more power than the Gibson...hopefully it will work out! |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 21:51 (Ref:3727644) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,921
|
The car will weight 750 kg, which must be ballasted to minimum weight, allowing an ideal weight distribution .
The Megachrome engine, which is available exclusively in the LMP1 for Ginetta, will be able to beat the performance of the Gibson LMP2 engines, which is 600 HP strong. http://cms3.gt-eins.at/le-mans-wec/1...a-lmp1-projekt |
||
|
18 Apr 2017, 22:13 (Ref:3727647) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
|
750kg is not easy task, explains the cost of the car a bit better as well considering the materials, design and additional machining time & complexity for a lot of the parts.
If they can reliably achieve 750kg and > 600hp this thing is going to be bloody awesome. |
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 22:39 (Ref:3727653) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,409
|
That would be cool if they could run at 750kg, but they'll ballast it to the minimum weight which is currently 830kg.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2017, 23:06 (Ref:3727659) | #8 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
|
Ah right, I misunderstood, still, 830kg and more power than the P2 should at least give them a decent pace advantage over that class so we don't see the mess that is Kolles.
|
|
|
19 Apr 2017, 00:23 (Ref:3727667) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,829
|
The last LMP cars that I know of that were 750KG or less unballasted where the 2012/2013 and later Audi R18s, and the LMP1 wolf in LMP2 sheep's clothing that was the Porsche RS Spyder (750kg was LMP2 minimum at the time, and was the only car to meet that with ballast). Also most LMP675s that were purpose built for those regs were down to below 700kg with ballast, which of course is part of the reason they were so fragile.
I know that the Toyota LMP1s and the Porsche 919s are obviously ballasted to meet 875kg, but I doubt that they're 750kg unladen. Also, LMPs are weighed without drivers or fuel onboard. |
||
|
20 Apr 2017, 14:04 (Ref:3727975) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,921
|
Good interviews with Bruno Engelric (Mecachrome) and Paolo Catone (consultant)
http://www.endurance-info.com/fr/bru...pied-en-lm-p1/ http://www.endurance-info.com/fr/pao...-est-excitant/ |
||
|
20 Apr 2017, 21:05 (Ref:3728039) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
I'm glad others see the Cadillac likeness in this design.
|
|
|
25 May 2017, 22:33 (Ref:3736056) | #12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,409
|
DSC getting early access to the windtunnel/cfd model. A new render is shown too.
|
|
|
14 Jun 2017, 15:11 (Ref:3741242) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,921
|
New Pics Of Ginetta LMP1 In Williams Wind Tunnel.
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2017/0...nd-tunnel.html |
||
|
14 Jun 2017, 19:48 (Ref:3741359) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,409
|
||
|
15 Jun 2017, 08:27 (Ref:3741547) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
https://twitter.com/dailysportscar/s...6203157303300/
This rear end looks like an early concept of Dome S103 which has an air tunnel. |
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 08:13 (Ref:3745693) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,210
|
Model in the wind tunnel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XASVoOcrJ5M http://www.dailysportscar.com/2017/0...l-testing.html http://www.dailysportscar.com/2017/0...r-ginetta.html Quote:
|
||
|
21 Jun 2017, 08:53 (Ref:3745695) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
CLM nismo engine should push not less than 650hp, considering that it was able to hit 3:24 without any real aero development; guess that with the same power and a much better developed aero (+ michelin tyres pheraps) 3:22 shouldn't be an issues.
Considering also that next year, very likely lmp2 will be able to set 3:24 at least. Let's see if this ginetta lmp1 will be in grid for real next season |
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 (Ref:3745711) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,960
|
I thought Sam Collins said the CLM Nismo engine was at 600hp due to the fuel flow, but capable of 700.
|
|
|
21 Jun 2017, 10:23 (Ref:3745716) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
Anyway, CLM aero development is quite poor, so I guess it produces a lot of drag and a laughable downforce. Anyway the car managed to hit 340km/h at le mans and was the highest top speed car at spa too. Considering that the car should have >100kg/h fuel flows, the real power output could be really over 600hp. Won't be surprised if has >750Nm as torque peak, being nismo gt-r engine revlimit set to 6500rpm if 2015 memory help me. BTW, over 700Nm, >600hp @6500rpm... these remind me the DBR9 V12 figures.... |
||
|
21 Jun 2017, 11:14 (Ref:3745730) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,484
|
|||
|
21 Jun 2017, 20:00 (Ref:3745859) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,409
|
||
|
22 Jun 2017, 07:57 (Ref:3745964) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
||
|
22 Jun 2017, 11:55 (Ref:3746010) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
|||
|
22 Jun 2017, 12:06 (Ref:3746014) | #24 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
|
||
|
22 Jun 2017, 13:25 (Ref:3746048) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,960
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ginetta G8 F3 car from 1964 | Sprint | Motorsport History | 11 | 29 Sep 2014 20:28 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
Ginetta Racing | Redlake27 | National & Club Racing | 9 | 29 Oct 2003 12:23 |
Ginetta G12P | tonyabacus | Motorsport History | 2 | 2 Aug 2002 07:44 |