Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 Apr 2005, 06:21 (Ref:1281809)   #51
mountainstar
Veteran
 
mountainstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Posts: 6,885
mountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridmountainstar should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snrub
I
As for the international thing, last time I checked the FIA didn't sanction either series. Granted, one race abroad hardly is worth critisizing the IRL over when the reasoning for the race is obvious.
Actually in a way they do, but it's so complicated I wont bore you with it!
mountainstar is offline  
__________________
Wolverines!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 07:10 (Ref:1281839)   #52
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
The reasoning behind the suggestion that the two series have only a few "combined" races is obvious. Both series have multi-year commitments to their current promoters. For example, it's not as if ChampCar can simply phone the people in Edmonton and tell them that it's suddenly a one-race deal because they're uniting with the IRL and chopping the schedules.

Unifying the schedules will take time. Unifying the future specs is where the window of opportunity is quickly closing, and if they're gonna do something they'll have to do it pretty soon.

But I really don't think that they will.
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 07:18 (Ref:1281844)   #53
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Which would be a great shame.

Both series will end up as irrelevant and close to death, I fear.
Kicking-back is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 08:47 (Ref:1281887)   #54
jock25
Racer
 
jock25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 223
jock25 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by BootsOntheSide
According to FIA rules, you need to race in 3 continents to be an international series. ChampCars thus didn't become one until after the split, and isn't one anymore, and the IRL never has been.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary both championships are international but that's getting off the point


As the owners of Cosworth KK and GF could really push a supply of engines to cover the (perhaps) inevitable loss of powerplants in the IRL. As I said before, the chance to get closer to a set of common specs would provide the right platform to move forward.

I would suggest that (assuming we can get to that stage) the emergence of a "super-series" of 3-5 races including Indy would allow over 4-5 years perhaps the new series to supersede the pre-existing ones. This is undoubtedly the best options since a straight merger has never worked.

I know TG has questioned whether either side could sell 'sponsorship' on this basis but there would still be common themes - the IRL teams would still be able to hunt sponsors on the basis of 'racing at Indy' and the CC teams could still make a case to North-American based companies with international ambitions who probably would love the opportunity for additional coverage at Indy.

Unless we wait until one of them goes bankrupt, this is the best option IMHO.
jock25 is offline  
__________________
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting" - Steve McQueen
Old 19 Apr 2005, 10:33 (Ref:1281957)   #55
JohnSSC
Veteran
 
JohnSSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Slovenia
Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,073
JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!
As we have seen, contracts don't mean a heck of a lot in this business (or at least handshakes). Breaking some contracts in order to pare down the venues may be easier than you think.

It is the technical specs that will require the most thought to achieve this. And they have to. If they don't then all the contracts in the world will mean nothing if Series A or Series B no longer exist.
JohnSSC is offline  
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton.
Old 19 Apr 2005, 13:08 (Ref:1282071)   #56
N I Tram
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
N I Tram should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Initially the idea of running the two championships with simialr chassis and a few common races is a good one. Both championships probably have simialr visions for what their 2007 cars will be like anyway. I've always felt that unification is important as long as both championships have similar goals - really the IRL has targetted a mainly-US mainly-ovals lineup, while ChampCar is becoming very international. Perhaps there is now room for both, but only as niché championships - a united series could gain ground int eh next few years and eventually close the gap to NASCAR.
N I Tram is offline  
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom"
Old 19 Apr 2005, 13:28 (Ref:1282092)   #57
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
As RM wrote, both sides reported they "agreed to disagree." They're no longer closer to any type of merged series now than they were before Eidswick and George met. I really don't think they want to do business with each other. They might've met at Mario's behest and with Mario's ideas, but Mario's ideas don't fit the program for either series and a merger or unification or whatever you want to call it based on that would result in a lot more confusion in the marketplace than we have now. Is Hornish running here? No, that's where Tracy runs I think, er, maybe, well, er, I don't know.
indycool is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 14:26 (Ref:1282152)   #58
jock25
Racer
 
jock25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 223
jock25 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
For the 'floating' spectator, the situation is already confused so IMHO the benefits of pulling the IRL and CHamp Car closer outweighs any potential negatives. Yes there would be more confusion in the short term but very quickly the "super-series" combining 4-5 races from each championship would become a prominent championship.

Are you an Indycar fan? No I'm a Champ Car fan. I thought Champ Car was Indycar? No...Indycar is the IRL. What's the IRL? The IRL is Indycars...etc

Though it is a minor championship, the IROC doesn't seem to have any trouble promoting itself despite the presence of NASCAR, IRL, Champ Car, sprint car etc. drivers competing at a series of circuits with multiple allegiances to multiple championships.
jock25 is offline  
__________________
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting" - Steve McQueen
Old 19 Apr 2005, 15:06 (Ref:1282188)   #59
icemachine
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Canada
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,311
icemachine should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridicemachine should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The Open Wheel Super Series

Sounds good to me, CC can run Ford badged Cosworths and IRL can run Chev badged Cosworths

It would be good to see 33 running at more than just 1 event. I'm thinking

Miami-Homestead
Indy
Road America
Mid-Ohio
Michigan

3 ovals, 2 road courses lots of Fans and high TV ratings
icemachine is offline  
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund
Old 19 Apr 2005, 15:44 (Ref:1282222)   #60
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by indycool
As RM wrote, both sides reported they "agreed to disagree." They're no longer closer to any type of merged series now than they were before Eidswick and George met. I really don't think they want to do business with each other. They might've met at Mario's behest and with Mario's ideas, but Mario's ideas don't fit the program for either series and a merger or unification or whatever you want to call it based on that would result in a lot more confusion in the marketplace than we have now. Is Hornish running here? No, that's where Tracy runs I think, er, maybe, well, er, I don't know.

Curt Cavin in the Indy Star wrote besically the same thing...and Brian Barnhart said there are many more hurdles to overcome than simply adopting the same equipment specs for both series...many philosophical differences that do not mesh....

Don't hold your breath on this one...because I don't think it is any closer now than it was last summer...or the summer before...or the one before that...
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 16:51 (Ref:1282284)   #61
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I've heard that "philisophical" thing thrown around a bit now (including by TG), could someone explain how the cars couldn't be the same and the philosophy met with different wing changes?
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 19 Apr 2005, 17:21 (Ref:1282296)   #62
sgw2
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
United States
Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 485
sgw2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The philosophy is quite simple:

Save the Motegi race, which is really just for Honda (at their insistence), IRL is strictly US market focused.

CCWS/OWRS is Australian Kalkhoven's baby, and he is pushing the series Pacific rim, trying to add races in China, Japan, and other places in the Pacific to add to Asutralia and Korea. Effectively his vison is a sort of new Tasman series with wider range.

How do you resolve that?
sgw2 is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 17:54 (Ref:1282313)   #63
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, in that case, and if the drift continues, the IRL will essentially be the new CART and ChampCar will be off doing something else!
Kicking-back is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 17:59 (Ref:1282318)   #64
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The Philosophy hang-up is:

TG wants to run the series....OWRS wants a partnership, with KK & GF as their key players in the troika....and others in OWRS probably don't want Tony in the mix at all....

That one probably will never be resolved...Tony doesn't want to govern by committee, and the OWRS side won't hand over the store, lock, stock and barrel to him....

Last edited by Tim Northcutt; 19 Apr 2005 at 17:59.
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 19:04 (Ref:1282368)   #65
sgw2
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
United States
Sunnyvale, California
Posts: 485
sgw2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tim,

What store in the same market? The only race OWRS has that TG wants is LBGP, and I suspect that wont be for much longer (why else not announce a CCWS extension already?). So what would he want?

I really think the Team Australia, addition of Korea, China and maybe Japan show where the focus of Kalkhoven is. Forsythe is the only reason to keep US/Canadian presense. If it weren't for KK's funding of them CCWS wouldn't have any US races. The Pacific races and Mexico City actually pay significant money for CCWS. The US races are basically money sinks. The drift is unstoppable.

As for Control, KK (and GF) want to run the show as promoters (witness SJ over LS) just as TG wants to. Each is staking out a different turf. No difference except who is the boss. (BTW I do like the toning down of the mutual hatred talk by both sides. That only hurt both series attendance and upset sponsors.)

Also what purpose is served by the unified formula anyway? Only that CCWS teams can race at Indy with the same equipment. But as NHR shows, if they get a sponsor, then they'll just buy IRL equipment.

That is pretty much how I see it. And why I think it is month of May BS we will probably hear once or twice more before it goes away for good.
sgw2 is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 19:07 (Ref:1282371)   #66
Tim Northcutt
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
United States
Indianapolis
Posts: 9,215
Tim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTim Northcutt should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
KK and GF both said Tony wanted to buy them out...they aren't interested in selling....

Tony doesn't want to share the power....and KK and GF would consider being partners...but not relinquishing the powwer to one guy...

I'm glad they are at least talking, too....but I just don't expect it to gain any traction....
Tim Northcutt is offline  
__________________
Finally...

One American Open Wheel Series!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 19:34 (Ref:1282396)   #67
macdaddy
Veteran
 
macdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Canada
St.Catharines Ontario
Posts: 8,125
macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!macdaddy has a real shot at the podium!
"We need another hero."

David Phillips' Commentary
macdaddy is offline  
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus!
Old 19 Apr 2005, 20:37 (Ref:1282470)   #68
Jordi
Veteran
 
Jordi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Catalonia
Vilafranca del Penedés, CATALONIA
Posts: 5,276
Jordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Phillips is quite right in saying that Champ Cars' targeted market (Pacific Rim) will have to fight against F1, and the IRL maybe playing 2nd, 3rd and 4th fiddle to NASCAR's series.

I'd say they should join and revert to the Y2K CART format, that is, about 20 races, five outside North America (Surfers, Japan, China, Brazil, and Lausitz?) and the rest on a majority of road courses - since NASCAR races in ovals, let's race where NASCAR and F1 don't. It makes sense to me, at least. Otherwise, running on ovals where NASCAR fills the house only looks horribly bad. I would only maintain the historic/best venues (Indy, Milwaukee, Michigan, Fontana, rebuild Nazareth...) and take off the 1.5 mile clone ovals that ISC has grown everywhere.

But I don't have a bucketload of money to buy the two championships, sadly.
Jordi is offline  
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport."
-Jim Clark
Old 19 Apr 2005, 22:36 (Ref:1282567)   #69
Hazard
Veteran
 
Hazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,710
Hazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridHazard should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordi
Phillips is quite right in saying that Champ Cars' targeted market (Pacific Rim) will have to fight against F1, and the IRL maybe playing 2nd, 3rd and 4th fiddle to NASCAR's series.

I'd say they should join and revert to the Y2K CART format, that is, about 20 races, five outside North America (Surfers, Japan, China, Brazil, and Lausitz?) and the rest on a majority of road courses - since NASCAR races in ovals, let's race where NASCAR and F1 don't. It makes sense to me, at least. Otherwise, running on ovals where NASCAR fills the house only looks horribly bad. I would only maintain the historic/best venues (Indy, Milwaukee, Michigan, Fontana, rebuild Nazareth...) and take off the 1.5 mile clone ovals that ISC has grown everywhere.

But I don't have a bucketload of money to buy the two championships, sadly.

Well, just buy the IRL and then...

Erm, sorry...forgot, no inter series flaming....

Anyway, stuff China, run at Rockingham again (Brands wasn't really suited to Champcars).
Hazard is offline  
Old 19 Apr 2005, 23:01 (Ref:1282583)   #70
codename_47
Veteran
 
codename_47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Coventry/Birmingham
Posts: 1,213
codename_47 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcodename_47 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazard
Anyway, stuff China, run at Rockingham again (Brands wasn't really suited to Champcars).
The INDY (hyuck) Circuit wasn't no, the Gp layout however *sigh*
codename_47 is offline  
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe....
Old 20 Apr 2005, 06:52 (Ref:1282700)   #71
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by codename_47
the Gp layout however *sigh*
Couldn't agree more, although I'm probably one of the few who liked seeing the cars on the Indy circuit - for once they were racing at a proper road course, with great scenery, wonderful elevation changes and so on. Just a shame the on-track action wasn't there.

Last edited by rustyfan; 20 Apr 2005 at 06:54.
rustyfan is offline  
Old 20 Apr 2005, 14:47 (Ref:1283049)   #72
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgw2
IRL is strictly US market focused. CCWS/OWRS is Australian Kalkhoven's baby, and he is pushing the series Pacific rim, trying to add races in China, Japan, and other places in the Pacific to add to Asutralia and Korea. Effectively his vison is a sort of new Tasman series with wider range. How do you resolve that?

What store in the same market? The only race OWRS has that TG wants is LBGP, and I suspect that wont be for much longer (why else not announce a CCWS extension already?). So what would he want?

I really think the Team Australia, addition of Korea, China and maybe Japan show where the focus of Kalkhoven is. Forsythe is the only reason to keep US/Canadian presense. If it weren't for KK's funding of them CCWS wouldn't have any US races. The Pacific races and Mexico City actually pay significant money for CCWS. The US races are basically money sinks. The drift is unstoppable.
That's 3-4 races, CC will remain a US/North American based series. If it wasn't for Forsythe and KK's deep pockets the series wouldn't exist. If it wasn't for TG's deep pockets the IRL wouldn't exist. TG doesn't just want LB. He wouldn't just go away if he had it. Recall that during the bankrupcy hearings that he wanted TO. We know he recently negotiated with Montreal. Last year they moved in on Milwaukee. Essentially he wants any CC venue possible. CC needs money to keep it afloat, a few cash cows doens't doom the series to F1-Lite-For Asia status. Don't kid yourself, I see no reason why TG wouldn't run the 3 Canadian races and 2 Mexican races.

SJ over Laguna is because Laguna had a race attendance of 5000 last year! I don't think it's fair to read more into it than that.

Unified equipment would allow the CC teams with less financial resources to run at Indy, instead of just NH. Unified races would also allow both series to run at certain events that would be mutually benificial. Think about it, IRL sponsors would probably like to be @ LB. If IRL sponsors were @ LB because the series was running jointly with CC, then it's to everyone's benifit. (and vise versa) Promoters can't afford to pay a good sanctioning fee for a mediocre event, but a hugely successful event could mean sharing of a lucrative fee between the two series.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 20 Apr 2005, 15:02 (Ref:1283058)   #73
indycool
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
indycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridindycool should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I do not believe TG has EVER wanted to buy them out, nor would he pay the price that OWRS would want to extract if a proposal was made. If he wanted to buy them out, he could've made a bid when the stock purchase offer was on the table in August of 2003. When he was contacted by Bear. Stearns on behalf of CART, he said "no." He only bid on three races at the CART bankruptcy auction. He's going a distinctly different direction than OWRS as Phillips' commentary points out.

Yes, he wants the IRL at Long Beach. He bid on that contract publicly at the auction. Do I think he'll buy it outright from DDE? No, not a chance. The asking price would be too much when you're not buying property and buying into a contract with the city of Long Beach that only has five years left to run and that could change as politics change. Remember the CART race in Rio? When the office of the mayor changed hands, the race ended and CART got stiffed.

These historic "olive branch" talks that mean nothing are getting far too much credibility....this time, put out by Robin Miller, a paid employee of CCWS, no less...and the boards are lighting up over it. IMO, they're farther apart now than they've EVER been. Not gonna come close to happening.
indycool is offline  
Old 20 Apr 2005, 15:37 (Ref:1283089)   #74
Roninho
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 394
Roninho should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by indycool
Yes, he wants the IRL at Long Beach. He bid on that contract publicly at the auction. Do I think he'll buy it outright from DDE? No, not a chance. The asking price would be too much when you're not buying property and buying into a contract with the city of Long Beach that only has five years left to run and that could change as politics change. Remember the CART race in Rio? When the office of the mayor changed hands, the race ended and CART got stiffed.
It would be a major blow for CC and therefor maybe worth a little extra for TG. Not only would champcar lose one of the few profitable(?) events they have, it would also be the loss of their marque event and leave them with not so many interesting assets.
Imo it all depends on how much faith DDE has in champcar and it's owners. If they believe that kk & friends will keep investing in cc & show direct improvements i see no reason why they would want to team up with IRL (apart from the Toyota-connection).
Roninho is offline  
Old 20 Apr 2005, 16:41 (Ref:1283138)   #75
Amar7605
Veteran
 
Amar7605's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
United States
Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 1,065
Amar7605 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with Roninho. CC has had a long relationship with DDE and LB. If they race switched to the IRL then there is the possibility that the LBGP has to re-promote themselves. It may be a harder sell to convince people to see an IRL race than a CC race.

I look at Fontana and see that on average there were twice as many CC patrons than IRL patrons. So would people in the LA area be willing to see the IRL race? I am not so convinced.
Amar7605 is offline  
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too!
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speed News: Champ Cars at Sebring with ALMS 2006 BobHWS ChampCar World Series 53 20 Jul 2005 14:48
Speed News: New Effort to Unify the Indy Racing League and Champ Car (Merged again) StickShift IRL Indycar Series 124 3 Jun 2005 09:45
The Indy Racing League might not have an overcrowded pit road after all. ¡As-de-mim! ChampCar World Series 17 17 Jan 2003 23:34


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.