|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Oct 2005, 10:01 (Ref:1429350) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 605
|
Sato Excluded Villeneuve Penalised
|
||
__________________
"Sky has closed in,........and yet again we have challenging, and changable conditions for the drivers" (Martin Brundle Hungry 2011, the weekend of the sky deal confirmation) |
10 Oct 2005, 10:47 (Ref:1429415) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 263
|
I'd like to know how they came to the conclusion about handing down those sentences.
|
||
|
10 Oct 2005, 10:51 (Ref:1429422) | #3 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Sato crashed into another car, which is worse than causing someone to go off without hitting them, I suppose.
|
|
|
10 Oct 2005, 11:02 (Ref:1429435) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
I honestly don't see that, both drivers were penalised for putting another driver out of the race, hitting them or not is irrelivant imo.
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
10 Oct 2005, 11:42 (Ref:1429496) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Centipede: An ant built to government specifications" |
10 Oct 2005, 12:39 (Ref:1429541) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
Jacques hasn't been penalised, effectively. He'll go one car earlier next weekend, and that is more likely to be a major advantage (if the track conditions change) than a slight penalty. Perhaps JPM didn't complain loudly enough. This is the third time Sato has recieved a penalty this season, and that should be the point where he shouldn't be allowed back in the car, as he's downright dangerous. I know both JV and Taku have their fans, but everyone else can see through them as a has-been and a never-gonna-be respectively.
|
|
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
10 Oct 2005, 12:52 (Ref:1429549) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 807
|
I guess there was more room for doubt over the JV incident, whereas the Sato one was obviously and suicidally his fault.
|
||
|
10 Oct 2005, 12:56 (Ref:1429551) | #8 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 338
|
I would've written JV off after the first few races this year as well but of late he's been pretty much on Massa's pace. I've never been a fan - and it looks like he did the wrong thing at Suzuka - but he's not as bad as people seem to make out. That's all i'll say - continue the roast.
|
|
|
10 Oct 2005, 13:12 (Ref:1429567) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
I think the penalties are somewhat inconsistent. Sato's gotten two penalties in three races, but it's not like he alone has hit people this year. I guess it's easy to penalise something who already has the "kamikaze" myth written all over him. I mean, how long had been since someone was disqualified for crashing into someone?
About JV vs JPM, I hope the FIA has better cameras because what was shown on TV was inconclusive in my opinion. |
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
10 Oct 2005, 14:04 (Ref:1429621) | #10 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 37
|
interesting that the link provided by the thread opener, thanks Dan, has detailed pictures of the Sato/Trulli incident and nothing of any use for the JV/JPM incident.
|
|
__________________
The same moment that you are seen as the best, the fastest and somebody that cannot be touched, you are enormously fragile. |
10 Oct 2005, 15:05 (Ref:1429678) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,550
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
"Stacy's mom has got it going on, she's all I want, and I've waited so long. Stacy can't you see, you're just not the girl for me, I know it might be wrong but I'm in love with Stacy's mom" |
10 Oct 2005, 15:11 (Ref:1429686) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Oct 2005, 15:24 (Ref:1429701) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 588
|
I think that Sato escaped with a smaller penalty that what he really deserved. I mean he came 13th but because of the penalty, it is as if he did not race. His removal will not give him any consequences. The thing is that he must not be racing in F1, but in a car demolition race.
|
||
|
10 Oct 2005, 16:22 (Ref:1429754) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
|
Exactly how was Sato/Trulli incident different from Webber/Schumacher incident in Turkey?
|
||
__________________
Think, then act. Don't act, then think. -Jamie Hyneman |
10 Oct 2005, 16:47 (Ref:1429777) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,324
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Oct 2005, 16:53 (Ref:1429782) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 807
|
Quote:
I just think JV's was more "racing incident" than Sato's |
|||
|
10 Oct 2005, 17:36 (Ref:1429835) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,324
|
Quote:
Come over and discuss the actual incident on the JV / JPM incident thread if you want to debate with me the limited facts we know of it. |
|||
|
10 Oct 2005, 18:49 (Ref:1429917) | #18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 807
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Oct 2005, 20:29 (Ref:1430040) | #19 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 374
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you can leave black marks from the time you exit a corner till the time you brake for the next turn, then you have enough horsepower." --Mark Donohue Colin McRae 1968-2007 |
10 Oct 2005, 20:50 (Ref:1430062) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
No. I rekon that the neccesary measures were taken. I was hoping that Sato would be excluded, because if someone done that to me i would not be happy inthe slightest. I would march to the Clerk with my cheque book in hand |
|||
__________________
"Sky has closed in,........and yet again we have challenging, and changable conditions for the drivers" (Martin Brundle Hungry 2011, the weekend of the sky deal confirmation) |
10 Oct 2005, 20:54 (Ref:1430068) | #21 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
What would you do with the chequebook?
Beat the CoC over the head with it? |
|
|
10 Oct 2005, 22:06 (Ref:1430171) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
The S/T incident was one much more obvious and stupid mistake, it looked as if he was trying to do exactly that, push Trulli out, although I'm sure he didn't. But it was a totally STUPID mistake. Plus, it was not the first stupid mistake by the driver in question. |
|||
|
11 Oct 2005, 00:53 (Ref:1430295) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 730
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Centipede: An ant built to government specifications" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sato-Massa vs. Villeneuve-Frentzen | santori | Formula One | 20 | 10 Mar 2004 11:33 |
#23 BMS Ferrari 550 - Excluded from Donnington result! | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 18 | 17 Jul 2003 14:24 |
Boardman excluded from 2nd race | Craig | Touring Car Racing | 21 | 28 Jun 2003 15:28 |
Piquet Jr Excluded from 1st Session | rlinter | National & International Single Seaters | 23 | 7 Apr 2003 21:04 |
Sainz excluded from Rally Australia and championship | KC | Rallying & Rallycross | 10 | 16 Nov 2000 12:46 |