Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing > ACO Regulated Series

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 Jul 2004, 14:44 (Ref:1039618)   #1
Garrett
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United States
Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 242
Garrett should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
P1 top speeds with new ACO rules and regulations???

Yesterday, I had read in an Enginnering Racing magizine that the new P1 cars should have higher top speeds with the new rules and regulations. At monza, the team Nasamax car was 9km/h faster than any other car down the straight. The team boss was interviwed and stated that they could have gotten the car to reach 360km/h down the straight if they wanted to due to the new ACO rules. What is your take on the top speeds of P1 cars from the new ACO rules?? I don't know mine?! Maybe the new P1 cars will have faster top speeds!?
Garrett is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 14:52 (Ref:1039621)   #2
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
The new LMP1 cars have aorund 50-60BHP more power, but create a lot more drag, which should keep speeds in check.

The problem with the old cars is that they were very sensitive when air got under the car at a hump etc. and due to the large flat floor took off like the CLR etc.

The new cars have tunnels, which create significant downforce under the car, preventing the flipping problems.

Regarding the 360km top speed, I'm sure the 'old' LMP900 cars could also have gone much quicker at Monza as well, but you need the extra downforce to negociate the rest of the circuit. Same goes for LM. The R8s have never been the quickest in a straightline, but always quicker over a lap.

Last edited by JAG; 18 Jul 2004 at 14:57.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 16:06 (Ref:1039656)   #3
MulsanneMike
Veteran
 
MulsanneMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
Posts: 1,831
MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!
Straight line speed is always good I think. Couple that with a downforce reduction and it should lead to laps times slower than before but with some impressive trap speeds which is good for the headlines...
MulsanneMike is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 20:25 (Ref:1039811)   #4
Cadete
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Portugal
Posts: 466
Cadete should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by JAG

The new cars have tunnels, which create significant downforce under the car, preventing the flipping problems.
At similar ride height, the tunnels create more downforce than a flat floor, yes, but remmember that in adition to the tunnels the new cars have raised ride height. The reason why ACO did this is because they want less downforce (raised height) and center the downforce for less instability (tunnels instead of rear diffuser).
Cadete is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 20:29 (Ref:1039814)   #5
MulsanneMike
Veteran
 
MulsanneMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
Posts: 1,831
MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally posted by Cadete
At similar ride height, the tunnels create more downforce than a flat floor, yes, but remmember that in adition to the tunnels the new cars have raised ride height. The reason why ACO did this is because they want less downforce (raised height) and center the downforce for less instability (tunnels instead of rear diffuser).
Spot on. Figure the new LMP1 cars have approaching 20% less downforce than LMP900. Sure they have tunnels, but as you mention, that is more about moving the center of pressure forward. They are so heavily regulated that they aren't as nearly effective as the tunnel cars of the GTP/Group C era. But I must say that so far the car's pace is impressive, so it bodes well. Speed is the point and I hated the prospects of the cars being gutted and having to build back up. Now we still have quick cars and the are safe too.
MulsanneMike is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 20:34 (Ref:1039821)   #6
Cadete
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Portugal
Posts: 466
Cadete should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by MulsanneMike
Spot on. Figure the new LMP1 cars have approaching 20% less downforce than LMP900. Sure they have tunnels, but as you mention, that is more about moving the center of pressure forward. They are so heavily regulated that they aren't as nearly effective as the tunnel cars of the GTP/Group C era. But I must say that so far the car's pace is impressive, so it bodes well. Speed is the point and I hated the prospects of the cars being gutted and having to build back up. Now we still have quick cars and the are safe too.
I don't deserve the credit for that "Spot on", I read about it on your site and that's how I knew about it...
Cadete is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 22:46 (Ref:1039950)   #7
Garrett
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United States
Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 242
Garrett should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well, I hope that the new P1 cars can achieve high speeds with the new ACO rules and that some manufacture can make their car look better than the Nasamax car. O, man is that car ulgy. Hopefully some one like Audi, Porsche, Nissan, or etc. can come in and make a car that will set the standards of what the future P1s will look like. Just pray that it's prettier than the Nasamax!!!
Garrett is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jul 2004, 23:33 (Ref:1039974)   #8
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Garrett
Well, I hope that the new P1 cars can achieve high speeds with the new ACO rules and that some manufacture can make their car look better than the Nasamax car. O, man is that car ulgy. Hopefully some one like Audi, Porsche, Nissan, or etc. can come in and make a car that will set the standards of what the future P1s will look like. Just pray that it's prettier than the Nasamax!!!
Seen the Luchinni yet.

Last edited by JAG; 18 Jul 2004 at 23:34.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top speeds at Pre-Q 917Addicted Sportscar & GT Racing 39 8 May 2004 08:03
Rules and Regulations. Smokey 6 litre Sportscar & GT Racing 10 5 Apr 2003 11:34
Top speeds ThaDutchDevil Sportscar & GT Racing 3 11 Jun 2002 12:38
F1 Speeds - what do you think? f1_fanatic8 Racing Technology 2 18 Jun 2001 17:33
BTC Rules And Regulations vauxhall Touring Car Racing 3 10 Jan 2001 20:29


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.