|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Jan 2012, 22:24 (Ref:3017508) | #1401 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
26 Jan 2012, 23:22 (Ref:3017530) | #1402 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Laurent Chauveau made some nice comparison picture of the TS030, R18 and 908:
source: http://www.86400.fr/articles/203-dec...e-2-et-details |
|
|
26 Jan 2012, 23:23 (Ref:3017531) | #1403 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,812
|
|||
|
26 Jan 2012, 23:36 (Ref:3017537) | #1404 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
The side pots are extremely low, especially compared to the Peugeot. |
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 00:04 (Ref:3017547) | #1405 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
That car is generally very much like the Audi, with hints of Peugeot.
But both the Audi and Peugeot are really good machines, so why not get inspired? |
||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
27 Jan 2012, 00:13 (Ref:3017548) | #1406 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,099
|
Just noticed how much better the side view for the driver is in the TS030, you can see the entire side window but can barely see in the window on the R18 especially the 908. May have been something Toyota took into accout due to the side visability issues last year...
In the TS030 the driver sits WAY back from the canopy and the "A-pillar" is huge... |
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 00:20 (Ref:3017550) | #1407 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 00:57 (Ref:3017555) | #1408 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
The TS030 only has to cool a 3.4, NA, V8. Thus they can get away with smaller side pods as they need to grab less cooling air.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 00:59 (Ref:3017556) | #1409 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
The TS030's airflow management is of the Peugeot school. The only similarities I see to the R18 is how the Toyota integrated it's engine inlet into the fin and the high outboard rear fender trailing edge. Other than those two small details it's pretty evident the Toyota aerodynamicisits were looking hard at the 908.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 01:24 (Ref:3017559) | #1410 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 01:34 (Ref:3017561) | #1411 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Kazuki Nakajima interview by Japanese F1-Stinger website.
http://www.f1-stinger.com/f1-news/vo...25/017733.html http://www.f1-stinger.com/f1-news/vo...27/017750.html *Nakajima recorded 3:24-25 by the simulator. *The feeling of the hybrid system resembles the turbo engine car. *They are running only by rear assistance now. The hybrid system is full automatic. There is no display of a motor assist mode. *The engine starter motor is equipped. *The engine rev is about 10000 +alpha. *Headlight must improve. Brightness is insufficient. *The present aero parts are not the latest spec. *The machine is understeering. However, the characteristic of this car is a cornering machine. |
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 01:59 (Ref:3017566) | #1412 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Hisatake Murata (Chief of Toyota Hybrid system) interview by Japanese F1-Stinger website
http://www.f1-stinger.com/f1-news/vo...25/017732.html http://www.f1-stinger.com/f1-news/vo...26/017737.html *The difference between THS-R and other hybrid system is a power-weight ratio. *Compared with HV-R of Tokachi spec, the weight saving is carried out several times. If it converts by HV-R of Tokachi spec, hybrid system is about 700kg (supposing the car weight is 900 kg). *Gross car weight is under 900 kg. Engine weight is 100 kg or less. *Cooling of a capacitor is water-cooling. Cooling of a motor is oil liquid-cooling. *It is only a spilit that surpasses Audi. |
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 02:26 (Ref:3017573) | #1413 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
Quote:
The headlights sure are big enough to be sufficient. Judging by what we've seen and heard this car is much further along than I think most people expected it to be, myself included. |
|||
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:00 (Ref:3017578) | #1414 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,392
|
I have a feeling they'll go with LED's in the aero update. As Samura-san has said it's interim package. When you go to their webpage and their twitter, the mock-up image has a strip of blue led's to the inner edge of the headlight assembly- http://twitter.com/#!/Toyota_Hybrid. Is there anyway to translate the whole interview's?
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:00 (Ref:3017579) | #1415 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:03 (Ref:3017581) | #1416 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
http://translate.google.com / http://www.microsofttranslator.com (paste the url)
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:03 (Ref:3017582) | #1417 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 46
|
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:19 (Ref:3017583) | #1418 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 396
|
|||
|
27 Jan 2012, 03:25 (Ref:3017585) | #1419 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,392
|
Their translations are vague and hard to understand. Samurai-san does a much better job! All i can get from it is that Nakajima is not used to the LeMans car, not used to the track, so he's been spending time in the simulator. He says his times from that are 3:24-3:25 range. This is good news if it relates to the track. If Nakajima can do 24's without much experience, I imagine that Wurz or Lapierre could be even faster?
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 04:00 (Ref:3017591) | #1420 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Jan 2012, 04:14 (Ref:3017592) | #1421 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,392
|
How good is 3:25's anyway? If they can be consistent with those times, that's gotta be close to what Audi and Peugeot were doing. I don't have reference so I ask.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 04:26 (Ref:3017594) | #1422 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
First you have to ask how good is the simulator or how accurate the track model is (i.e. is it laser scanned). Toyota knows the real life vs. sim offset, we don't.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 04:34 (Ref:3017597) | #1423 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Impressive simulator times nonetheless.
The more important thing is that Last Years Petrol LMP1's could not even muster a 3:30(barely). And theres no way the Toyota simulator is 5 seconds off of real world given the money put into it. It might be at most 1-2 seconds of? Toyota is so much faster than last years Petrols. Theres certainly going to be no more lobbying by the privateers. The petrol diesel equivalency wont be an effective exscuse aymore. (note added hybrid system however-whatever effect that has vs petrol lmp's of last year) |
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 04:59 (Ref:3017608) | #1424 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,392
|
Whatever the simulator is off by in time, the developments to the car should make it up. I think it simulates everything from new additions to the car to the tire compound. I remember them saying this from their F1 days. It's probably as accurate as can be, for a simulator.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2012, 07:34 (Ref:3017627) | #1425 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
You are correct.
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] Toyota plans Le Mans return with hybrid! | Bentley03 | 24 Heures du Mans | 424 | 8 Nov 2010 19:56 |
[LM24] Best LMP1/LMP900/LMGTP Manufacturer of the '00s at Le Mans | Danny_GT2 | 24 Heures du Mans | 11 | 11 Aug 2009 18:26 |
[LM24] Acura Heading to Le Mans in 2008 and LMP1 in 2009 | Mal | 24 Heures du Mans | 45 | 11 Jul 2007 23:05 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |