|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
7 Jul 2012, 00:14 (Ref:3103084) | #1151 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,392
|
If Toyota are pressed for cash (I doubt for 2013) Rebellion PAYING them to run a TS030 is somehow bad for Toyota's cash issue? That's basically what TMG does! It's a win win imo.
|
|
|
7 Jul 2012, 04:30 (Ref:3103129) | #1152 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Rebellion does not have to cash to pay for a TS030 and all the development. Seems like Toyota spent less than Audi this year but still pretty sizeable amount in Privateer speak
|
|
|
7 Jul 2012, 11:05 (Ref:3103225) | #1153 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
it seems that a lot of users here work in the managment of rebellion... how can you say that rebellion couldn't grid the car if they really want?
surely to grid a lola b12 is cheaper than grid a ts030, but who knows the real economic possibilities of the team? |
|
|
7 Jul 2012, 11:54 (Ref:3103243) | #1154 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 451
|
Quote:
Why should they pay for the develpment of the car? As long as Toyota is making money on the leasing deal, it is a win win fo Toyota (And Rebellion will have a good privateer car instead of buying two new cars for one season). |
|||
|
7 Jul 2012, 12:05 (Ref:3103249) | #1155 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
infact, i can't understand why toyota shouldn't lease an old and not updated car to a private team that alreaby has a partnership with TMG! a team that can easily win the lmp1 trophy with the ts030 and for sure can't run as fast as the cars used by the work team.
BTW peugeot supplied a 908HDi to oreca, but a lot of peugeot personell and drivers assisted the team that received 2010 updates too. More than a private car, at least for the whole 2010 season, could be called the forth official car. |
|
|
7 Jul 2012, 14:36 (Ref:3103302) | #1156 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Why couldnt Audi and Toyota lease cars to customers , without hybrid technology for the LMS .
Ban works outfits to the WEC . |
||
|
7 Jul 2012, 15:53 (Ref:3103328) | #1157 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
||
|
7 Jul 2012, 16:02 (Ref:3103335) | #1158 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
in theory a manufacter can lease/send/support a private team with their cars! the only difference from last year regulamentation is that private teams can't score points for the manufacter's cup (last year oreca 908HDi scored point for oreca in lmp1 team champ and for peugeot in manufacter's cup).
|
|
|
7 Jul 2012, 18:14 (Ref:3103384) | #1159 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,710
|
|||
|
7 Jul 2012, 18:15 (Ref:3103385) | #1160 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
WEC was created to pressure from works teams, to works teams compete... Doubts? There are only manufacturers championships in WEC and only designated works cars can make points... Some private teams are competing in WEC because the sponsors want to be were Audi and Toyota works teams are, not where Rebellion, Pescarolo, Oak are... People seem not to realise how more expensive should be a lease of a pair of Toyota TS030, he could be talking about 3 ou 4 times more then buy a pair of Dome cars and run them. As marketing strategy, it would make a lot more sense to lease TS030 to ALMS rather then WEC... |
|||
|
8 Jul 2012, 05:43 (Ref:3103633) | #1161 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
I believe the premise of the FIA WEC was that there would be two manufacturers competing. If it was only privateers in P1 they owuld have cancelled it in Typical FIA elitist fashion.
|
|
|
8 Jul 2012, 09:13 (Ref:3103664) | #1162 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
According to Sportscar-racing.net,
Many offers are coming to Dome. However, Minoru Hayashi does not have the intention of manufacturing the new chassis of S102.5 in 2013. That is because it does not become a profit even if it sells "several" new chassis. And, He would like to make his car quick "by himself." He does not want the third party to develop S102.5. Therefore, probably, there is also no mass production of the monocoque of S102.5. Probably the number of the next year's partners of Dome will be one. http://www.sports-carracing.net/2012...tm#120708news1 |
|
|
8 Jul 2012, 09:20 (Ref:3103667) | #1163 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,269
|
That sounds to me like an odd mentality to have when it comes to customer cars in sportscar racing... not very customer-friendly and not taking into account the customer teams' abilities and resources at all.
|
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
8 Jul 2012, 09:26 (Ref:3103668) | #1164 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
For Dome (Minoru Hayashi), sportscar development is not business but a hobby.
|
|
|
8 Jul 2012, 10:15 (Ref:3103683) | #1165 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
When Toyota totalled their first TS030 and announced they would miss Spa, FIA even changed the rule to allow manufacturers to miss 2 rounds and still be eligible to be classified in World Championship, when initially presence in every round was mandatory. Note that they made this tweak only to LMP1, not GTE... I guess they allowed 2 misses because they wanted to cover their @$$es in case Toyota decided to miss Barhain as well |
|||
|
8 Jul 2012, 10:23 (Ref:3103686) | #1166 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
If Dome doesn't sell any car at all or keep putting money in Pescarolo, for sure they will lose a lot of it. Even not being a profitable operation (that ship sailed a long time ago), they would not loose so much money as not to sell. And they are constantly mentioning Judd engine is 50hp short of the Toyota RV8KLM on the Rebellion cars, that's the chance to put the best engine available to privateers on their chassis. But, I know, Hayashi-san was a very different perspective of motorsport and endurance... |
|||
|
8 Jul 2012, 12:34 (Ref:3103719) | #1167 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Originally two cars could score points for the manufacturer championship. However, the regulation was changed after Peugeot's withdrawal, such only one car can score points and two rounds can be dropped. This was done to lure Toyota in full WEC season commitment. It was clear from the start of the project that Toyota would miss Sebring. |
||
|
8 Jul 2012, 20:53 (Ref:3103933) | #1168 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
Indeed they changed the rule 6 weeks before Toyota testing accident, not related, mainly because fear of a manufacturer missing Bahrain. Same time, each manufacturer only mandated to present one car, this to meet Toyota limitations on a very young project as, without Peugeot, it will only be Audi running for the crown. |
|||
|
8 Jul 2012, 21:03 (Ref:3103937) | #1169 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
|
peugeot annunced the retirment in late january, around 20/1/2012 if i remember well! since that day toyota intention was to join le mans and another pair of races (silverstone and fuji as rumored). Because of the critical situation, ACO convinced toyota to change their plans! so for the manufacter cup only the best placed car would gain points (to let have a fair competition because of toyota single entry) and knowing that toyota wouldn't however joint all the races, they reintroduced an old rule used in '70 in f1 (the best 6 results rule, only for manufacter's cup).
|
|
|
30 Jul 2012, 09:39 (Ref:3113611) | #1170 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,122
|
Goethe pulled the plug:
http://www.les-news.net/Actualite/we...-jette-leponge Pescarolo has no more money for the rest of the season, but is talking about running the Dome at Fuji, and running a LMP2. Not good at all. |
||
|
30 Jul 2012, 10:00 (Ref:3113625) | #1171 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Why doesn't DOME chase a HPD engine? Really stick it to Toyota!
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
30 Jul 2012, 10:06 (Ref:3113628) | #1172 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
Maybe he could run the P1 effort for Oak in WEC . Henri has to keep his team outta the courts again because of finance , I suggest he sits down and has a deep think about what he can afford to run , cuz if this team goes down a 2nd time , I doubt very much there will be anybody so generous to bail him out again . |
|||
|
3 Aug 2012, 12:41 (Ref:3115594) | #1173 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
http://www.dome.co.jp/labbbs/dmbbs.c...=detail&page=0
*Minoru Hayashi says that Dome is negotiating with three teams about future on official BBS of Dome. However, it is unknown whether tie-up is realized. Although the design of S102.5 is old, it is because a budget will not balance if a new car is developed. |
|
|
3 Aug 2012, 22:13 (Ref:3115794) | #1174 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 79
|
can't thank you japanese samurai for giving us an english run down of that news piece (amongst others) if we only had google translate to go on we would be thinking that dome had set themselves the task of competing for less than audi budgets for hospitality (or is that true and audi just spends heaps on hospitality). I do love the DOME but i also wish that they'd get their story straight are they or are they not going places with this car.
|
||
|
3 Aug 2012, 22:24 (Ref:3115797) | #1175 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discussion - is there a design issue with LMP | Mal | Sportscar & GT Racing | 142 | 6 May 2009 15:59 |
DOME/Judd (DUDD?) High Downforce Pkg... | meatballeyes | Sportscar & GT Racing | 3 | 9 Jul 2001 23:52 |
Jan lammers and Tom Coronel in DOME chassis!!!! | Geva racing | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 13 Dec 2000 06:26 |