|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 May 2004, 13:08 (Ref:974346) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,340
|
Overtaking, rules, boredom...who is at fault?
In http://f1.racing-live.com/en/headlin...18133139.shtml Mansell says he's not even going to watch the race. Can you blame him?
We keep complaining about all kind of stuff in FIA's rules, and how they 'kill' overtaking, and the thrill. But, when you watch '92 GP Monaco, what you can see is Mansell trying everything to pass Senna. Nowdays, we're happy if somebody overtakes at start/finish straight. Is it really all down to rules and regulations? Slick tyres and aerodinamics? Coulthard was driving behind Bernoldi for hours without attempting to pass. We see similar situations at every race - driver gets close to, but doesn't actually try to overtake the guy in front. When was the last time we've seen somebody constantly attacking the guy in front (besides Hakkinen at Spa in 2000). What we get is usually one try, possibly at the straight, and that's it. We never see a driver being 'all over' the guy in front. They just fake an atack or two, and hope for mistakes, without really putting the pressure. For me, beoing visible in mirrors is not pressure. So, why not? Why don't today's drivers keep trying? Note - none of this is applicable to Montoya, so don't give him as example |
||
__________________
Let it be |
18 May 2004, 13:23 (Ref:974355) | #2 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,026
|
Not trying is not the entire problem, or perception of the problem. However it doesn't help.
There are different kinds of not trying. Let's call them 'Michael not trying' and 'Ralf not trying'. Ralf not trying is the easiest to see. There is just no trying at all. Michael not trying is different. Take Imola and Barcelona, he didn't try because he knew he would just be able to destroy Button and Trulli on his in and out lap. That was the safer option. However we can remove this option and force Michael to have to try to overtake (which he can do very well!) - ban refueling. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
18 May 2004, 13:25 (Ref:974358) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Overtaking difficulties at Monaco don't certainly depend on rules.
At Monaco overtaking is almost impossible, period. Many threads have discussed this topic, but the race we going to see is really out of it. |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
18 May 2004, 13:37 (Ref:974377) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
In Barcelona it was expected that JB would pretty much slice his way through the field. The problem with that is how the cars make grip. There was only one realistic passing zone at the track but because the trailing car loses so much aerodynamic grip following into the last turn it made passing impossible. Even MS was not able to overhaul Trulli in a much slower car (in a straight line).
DC did try to pass Bernoldi, however he also had to use his brain. It take cooperation of both parties involved to execute a pass. Bernoldi was also driving pretty wide. At Monaco you are either on line or in the armco. I've seen many of the races of the 80's and early 90's (on tape) and there was not that much passing then either. Yeah, maybe a little more than now but not that much. Its the nature of openwheel racing. |
||
__________________
Eventually we learn |
18 May 2004, 15:55 (Ref:974511) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Mansell doesn't say anything about slicks and aero - he mentions safety and the circuits, you just assume that he's talking about aerodynamic vs mechanical grip, which he isn't. As far as that problem goes though, it is only really very evident and tedious at places like Barcelona, which has a succession of quicker/longer corners where the problem is most obvious. There was plenty of overtaking in the Bahrain race, for example, but some folk have conveniently forgotten that because it doesn't fit in with their misconception.
To have a car constantly harrying the car in front you need the quicker car to be behind for some reason, which these days doesn't happen much because car performance is so consistent and so close to the limit for all of the race. In Mansell's day the cars were more fragile and the race was not run at 100% - what we saw then was a driver deciding to risk a charge at a critical moment in the race but today they are already going flat-out. Mansell conveniently forgets all this because to do so makes him looker better. |
|
|
18 May 2004, 16:23 (Ref:974544) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
Last edited by Kirk; 18 May 2004 at 16:24. |
||
|
18 May 2004, 16:52 (Ref:974563) | #7 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
I agree with all above, and what happens is that some drivers wouldn't want to do it every race. This year's race in Imola, RB was criticized for not trying to overtake in a circuit known as "hard to do it", while everybody praised him for last year Silverstone race.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
18 May 2004, 17:05 (Ref:974577) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,193
|
Or maybe 21st century drivers are just wimps?
|
||
__________________
Think, then act. Don't act, then think. -Jamie Hyneman |
18 May 2004, 22:36 (Ref:974931) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,376
|
The point system isn't helping either. There is little reason to try and make a pass, when the point difference between places is so small. You can win the championship these days without ever winning a race.
Stop rewarding "consistency", and start rewarding winning again... |
||
__________________
"I don't feel insecure about 'being girlie'. I do as much media as I can because I want this IRL series to be so kick-butt that NASCAR goes, 'Huh?'" Danica Patrick |
18 May 2004, 22:53 (Ref:974944) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 May 2004, 11:28 (Ref:975332) | #11 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 76
|
Ban refuelling and introduce strict controls on aero so they can't design it to deliberately mess up the following car.
Having the same tyres would make the overtaking more genuine (i.e. from the driver's skill). Montoya's pass of Michael last year (Nurburgring) was dramatic, but 99% down to his better tyres (1% allowed for "his have a go" mentality)! |
||
__________________
Remember the Golden Rule....he who has the gold makes the rules. |
19 May 2004, 12:34 (Ref:975400) | #12 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,026
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
19 May 2004, 13:09 (Ref:975434) | #13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Just about the only way you could inject more overtaking is by shuffling the grid - no qualifying or somesuch. Or you could learn to appreciate that F1 is about more than overtaking, just like football is about more than goals. This constant moaning about overtaking (which DOES exist anyway) reminds me of the USA World Cup where it was considered to make the goalmouth wider so that more goals might occur and the uneducated TV audience wouldn't lose interest.
|
|
|
19 May 2004, 13:36 (Ref:975465) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,147
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 May 2004, 13:36 (Ref:975466) | #15 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,026
|
Glen is right. Although I would still make some rules changes to aid overtaking (well stated by me here and elsewhere). Whatever it wasn't ever that much different to know.
However one of the original points does still stand. Some drivers are more willing to and are better at overtaking. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
19 May 2004, 13:43 (Ref:975473) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Glen, people here (generally) aren't saying F1 is complete rubbish. We're just coming up with ways we think will make it better or more appealing to us. You have to admit that F1 is not perfect. It never will be, but the point is that some people have the opinion that certain things should be changed. Which is fine. You don't think things should be changed. That is also fine (and probably makes you far more contented at the moment too!), but you seem to be implying that we shouldn't even discuss it. Which, I believe, is not fine.
Last edited by krt917; 19 May 2004 at 13:43. |
||
|
19 May 2004, 13:47 (Ref:975479) | #17 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
Quote:
Other aspects that don't help, as has already been mentioned, include the gizmos and points system. Monaco, is a bit different though. It's a circuit completely unsuitable for F1, maybe even motor racing in general. |
||||
|
19 May 2004, 13:54 (Ref:975482) | #18 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,026
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
19 May 2004, 13:59 (Ref:975485) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
No, I wouldn't either. Sometimes I wish it wasn't on the calender, but other times.....
It's good from a 'testing the driver' point of view and does occassionally throw up the odd interesting race. Here's hoping against the odds this time!... |
||
|
19 May 2004, 15:16 (Ref:975548) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Oh no - discuss away, krt917. Things can always be improved. But you have to remmember a few things:
1. You need an objective in mind when you set about looking for changes. Abundant overtaking is not necessarily it - a one make series on control tyres with non-alterable set-ups would give you more overtaking, so would success ballast or swapping cars - these are all more non-F1 than a reduced incidence of overtaking... so you would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater as they say. 2. F1 has never contained as much overtaking as is suggested when these discussions take place. 3. It is possible to put so much time into whinging and moaning about how it aint like the good old days that you become determined not to enjoy the perfectly wonderful spectacle of F1 that is going on right now. |
|
|
20 May 2004, 05:36 (Ref:976108) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,340
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Let it be |
20 May 2004, 08:43 (Ref:976266) | #22 | |||
TT Photo Of The Year Winner - 2009 & 2010
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 533
|
Quote:
Things have become so critical in terms of winning (or staying ahead) these days that a driver will get slammed for not defending his position strongly enough if he doesn't shut the door hard on anyone taking a look up the inside. Granted that doors have been slammed shut throughout the history of the sport but I feel that the lack of racing room these days is worse than ever. After all - most of the tracks are wide enough to get three (or in some places four) cars wide. |
|||
__________________
Don't shop hungry; Don't drive angry. |
20 May 2004, 12:42 (Ref:976521) | #23 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 76
|
It's obvious, surely, that part, if not all, the problem is the clinging to the idea that every race we watch should be exciting to us in some way, this ideal that overtaking is the basis of a 'good' race. It's fantasy.
|
||
|
20 May 2004, 18:16 (Ref:976835) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I don't watch F1 to see overtaking. Don't get me wrong, I do love to see over-taking, but this isn't why I watch it. Never has been.
|
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
20 May 2004, 19:15 (Ref:976911) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
At last the boredom ends!!! | Lee Janotta | ChampCar World Series | 10 | 19 Nov 2002 04:35 |
It's all Stallone's fault. | rpolinski | ChampCar World Series | 35 | 23 Oct 2002 01:08 |
So who's fault was it? | ripper | Formula One | 61 | 7 Oct 2002 17:35 |