|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Apr 2004, 08:07 (Ref:951897) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
|
and on the Lister
. |
||
__________________
bernard |
26 Apr 2004, 09:33 (Ref:951970) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 981
|
excellent images bernard.
It does appear that the extensions are indeed part of the rear bodywork, and bolt onto the the wing endpaltes. There surely must be some kind of advantage to this arrangement, and not just cost? Especially as it seems lister have used it to produce new endplates too. |
||
__________________
watch this space :) |
29 Apr 2004, 22:10 (Ref:956176) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Pure speculation on my part, but these new GTS rear wing regs maybe one of the ACO's ways of trying to cut down on homologation specials with narrow prototype like cockpits, as seen on the Bentley. |
||
|
30 Apr 2004, 05:25 (Ref:956381) | #29 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
A real clean work...
- |
||
|
30 Apr 2004, 07:29 (Ref:956484) | #30 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 160
|
The toolboxes (as they quickly became known through the weekend) performed very well. Figures suggest they act as a full-span rear wing in terms of lift & drag.
...and as importantly, they didn't fly off anyone's car ! |
||
|
30 Apr 2004, 08:31 (Ref:956547) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
|
actually, the only car on which they aren't sealed with the rear wing is the Rollcentre Dallara
|
||
__________________
bernard |
30 Apr 2004, 12:42 (Ref:956858) | #32 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,633
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
30 Apr 2004, 14:58 (Ref:957008) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
You know, I'm surprised that these boxes are effective. I'd have thought that the point was for them to be aerodynamically neutral - otherwise, why shorten the wing at all?
Given the assumption that they don't produce d/f (ie don't generate low pressure under the box), wouldn't that reduce the effectiveness of the endplate extension? I thought the extension's purpose was to contain the low pressure immediately under the wing, but to my mind there would still be bleedoff between the low-pressure wing end and the box zone. :confused: |
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rear wing | fetus | Road Car Forum | 2 | 7 Dec 2004 16:13 |
Rear wing surfing | marcus | ChampCar World Series | 35 | 10 Nov 2004 02:03 |
New Audi Rear wing | Try Hard | Sportscar & GT Racing | 29 | 12 Apr 2004 15:21 |
2004 rear wing regulations... | Sodemo | Formula One | 18 | 21 Oct 2003 09:29 |
Standard rear wing for 2004 | Sodemo | Formula One | 21 | 27 Mar 2003 09:46 |