|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
6 May 2005, 12:39 (Ref:1294356) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Monopod Advice
I am currently considering buying a Monopod for my SLR camera. Being new to all this stuff i dont know very much about how they attach to your camera etc. Is there any models out there that you guys would recommend? For the record i have a Minolta Dynax 700si.
Cheers |
||
|
6 May 2005, 13:07 (Ref:1294380) | #2 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,837
|
Reply
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced |
6 May 2005, 17:57 (Ref:1294532) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 134
|
You may find a ball head more flexible than a conventional tilt swivel type mount on your monopod, but be warned, most decent ball mounts cost as much as a decent entry level monopod! Personally, am going to be getting a decent monopod first, and then upgrading with a decent ballhead later when i can afford it. At the moment however, i use a £15 job which makes the world of difference at anything over 200mm.
|
|
|
6 May 2005, 19:39 (Ref:1294613) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 303
|
Oh well, I guess my contrary view makes your choice difficult..
Go for a simple, strudy pole without any sort of head whatsovever.. Attach to lens, not body (don't stress the bayonet mounts).. I use a Manfrotto pro pole.. |
||
__________________
-- David Lister |
6 May 2005, 21:19 (Ref:1294661) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 329
|
If you have a lens with a collar you do not need a head, and in fact it is worse with one. It makes the system look and feel like a bendy toy. You can always tell the beginners, holding the monopod with one hand and swiveling the camera with the other. The right way is hand on top of the lens, the other on the camera.
If your lens does not have a collar, then a simple tilt head like the Manfrotto 234 will allow you to swing into portrait orientation. Get a decent monopod like a Manfrotto as it will last you a lifetime. The weak point in all of them (tripods too) is the adjustment/clamping mechanism and you do get what you pay for. |
||
__________________
Ken Professional Motorsport Photographer |
6 May 2005, 21:34 (Ref:1294681) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,741
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
6 May 2005, 21:56 (Ref:1294701) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
call me stupid but how does the monopod screw into a lense? do you need a lense that specifically supports this?
|
||
|
7 May 2005, 01:19 (Ref:1294766) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,748
|
Most of the bigger lenses have a tripod/monopod collar, usually removable, so you can balance it properly. If you have a massive lens you want it to be balanced as well as possible, not down at one end for example.
|
||
__________________
Renault/MSA Young Photographer of the Year 2006 |
7 May 2005, 11:02 (Ref:1294993) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 504
|
A lot of people don't like a monopod for a panning shot as it make you pan in an arc rather than a smooth follow through. What size lens are you using Daz?
|
|
|
7 May 2005, 11:05 (Ref:1294994) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,748
|
I generally take it off for panning, but for headons I like to use it.
|
||
__________________
Renault/MSA Young Photographer of the Year 2006 |
7 May 2005, 11:17 (Ref:1294998) | #11 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
Personally, i find a sharp panning shot impossible to achieve over about 200mm with a shutter speed of around 1/125th without a monopod, i'm just too shaky! |
||
|
9 May 2005, 21:22 (Ref:1297060) | #12 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 239
|
To pan with a monopod, because I usually pre-focus, I can pick up the car at an angle and as I pan towards the point of focus, the angle will gradually straighten up. It might not be a great method but it works and means I don't have to keep changing kit.
I have a nice sturdy Manfrotto - not sure of the model but it was about £40 a few years ago. Atop this, I have a Uni-loc ballhead circa £60, which is weighty and well-made and handy for taking lots of different shots - paddock and track. |
||
__________________
Dorset blokes do it in their wellies |
14 May 2005, 23:03 (Ref:1301007) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
I use a monopod with a mini-ball head. The flexibiliy the ball head give you is great. Plus if needed, you make make the whole lens/monopod combo alot smaller when needed which helps in small places (photo shuttle/media center/car trunk). No Matter what you do, just make sure that whatever you get can support the total weight of the camera and lens you plan on using.
|
||
|
16 May 2005, 12:25 (Ref:1302150) | #14 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 61
|
my 1st post here
I use a monopod and ball head (Manfrotto) , I use it to take most of the weight and have it set very loose on the ball so I have lots of flexibility. In between shots I nip up the adjustment on the ball so that all the weight is then suported by the monopod. Works for me so far but I'm still learning so don't take what I say as the best advice you can get cheers, |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monopod for Olympus E-10 | C.U.Motorsport | Motorsport Art & Photography | 1 | 12 Feb 2006 00:49 |
Need a new monopod | MikeHoyer | Motorsport Art & Photography | 11 | 31 Aug 2005 14:24 |
in need of advice | thelaminator2 | Motorsport Art & Photography | 2 | 4 May 2005 17:42 |
new and advice please!! | LisaD | Track Day Forum | 3 | 13 Jan 2004 21:22 |
Does anyone here actually use a tripod (not a monopod)? | G_Ilott | Motorsport Art & Photography | 11 | 24 May 2003 21:47 |